Is the landlord responsible for the death of a child caused by the staircase handrail being too low?

If the staircase handrail is too low and the child dies, the landlord is not responsible, and the guardian is responsible. Besides, the staircase handrail is a public facility, and the landlord is not responsible. FYI.

The handrail should be at least 60cm or more according to the convention, if it is indeed lower than this number, there should be a hidden danger of accident, resulting in the death of the child, and the landlord is of course responsible. However, the primary responsibility lies with the child's parents, and the lack of supervision is the main cause of the child's death. Now that the child is also dead, the first thing is to rectify it immediately, it is not too late to prevent the sheep from making amends, to prevent the next ** from happening, and then try to negotiate a solution, it is really not possible to go to court.

The staircase handrail is too low, resulting in the death of the child, is the room responsible? In fatal accidents, the handrail of the staircase is too low and the child dies, and the landlord has some responsibility, but the main responsibility is the caretaker. Because the handrail of the staircase of the landlord of the rental house is too low, just 60 cm high, it is dangerous for adults to walk down the stairs, so the landlord has a certain responsibility for causing the death of the child.

I think the landlord is not responsible, it is the responsibility of the child's guardian, and the responsibility is borne by the child's death due to the lack of care.

The landlord is not responsible, the escalator is like that when you rent, it is your responsibility to regulate poorly.

No, only the responsibility of the caretaker.

The staircase handrail should not be an excuse for the child's death, you should clearly know and completely avoid it when renting a house, it can only be said that it is the responsibility of the guardian of the child, not the responsibility of the child.

Everything is the responsibility of the parents, and if the parents don't give birth to him, there will be no follow-up

You can sue the landlord directly for tort liability. According to the General Principles of Civil Law and Contract Law, the landlord has an obligation to ensure safety.

As for the amount of compensation, calculated according to the standard of personal injury, the death compensation is 20 times the local per capita disposable income of the previous year, the funeral expenses are 6 times the average monthly income of the employees of the previous year, and the medical expenses are directly compensated according to the order, and a certain amount of compensation for moral damages can also be claimed.

It is also worth noting that since parents are directly responsible for the death of their child, they usually only receive 40% of the above compensation, although this is subject to the judge's decision.

There is no problem with the landlord whether or not to install handrails on the stairs is not the landlord's obligation. There are no handrails first, and rental houses come last. If the tenant rents a house without stair handrails, he or she should have a clear understanding of the dangers involved, and the landlord should bear the relevant risks, and the landlord is not responsible.

There is no legal basis for asking the landlord for compensation.

If the landlord's handrails are of ageing quality and are not strong enough to cause the child to fall, then the landlord should be responsible for the quality of the house. A distinction should be made between them.

The lease contract did not stipulate that the landlord had an obligation to install handrails, and there was no causal link between the landlord and the child's death.

There is no liability.

If you still have questions, you can contact me again and good luck!

Sue the landlord directly. Hold them liable for damages.

It is based on the General Principles of the Civil Law, the Contract Law and relevant judicial interpretations.

If the stair handrail is necessary, the landlord is liable for tort damages.

If the tenant drinks too much and falls to his death on the staircase without handrails, should the landlord be liable for compensation?

The landlord is not responsible, and the anti-theft window is not a necessary item for house security, which is the parents' own negligence.

The house only has a certain height of fire safety railings, there is no anti-theft window regulations, and the installation of anti-theft windows is the personal behavior of the owner.

Unless it is caused by the quality of the house or the hidden dangers of decoration, for example, the glass floor-to-ceiling windows do not have safety railings, and the landlord removes the safety fire railings without renovation, but there are no other installation measures, then the landlord is jointly and severally liable.

If a child climbs a window or falls from the balcony, then the landlord is not responsible. This is a parental responsibility.

I don't know why the landlord would rent the house to you guys. I don't think about my own children, I only think about whether others are responsible.

If someone goes to the store and buys a knife and kills the other, do you say the store is responsible?

Before you hold your landlord accountable, hold your guardian accountable.

What does this look like? See if the landlord is at fault, for example, the anti-theft window should be added to the window but did not add, and the fault needs to bear some responsibility.

If the house has obvious defects, such as large escalator gaps and insufficient height, you can sue the landlord.

Probably not, unless the house has a safety hazard.

The police have said that the stove is not up to standard, and it is the tenant who buys and installs and applies the gas stove issued by the Ministry of Construction.

Measures for the Administration of Urban Housing Leasing.

Article 21 If the natural damage of the rented residential building or the contract stipulates that it shall be repaired by the lessor, the lessor shall be responsible for repairing it. If the property is not repaired in a timely manner, resulting in a destructive accident in the house, resulting in property damage or personal injury to the tenant, the tenant shall be liable for compensation.

If the leased house is engaged in production and business activities, the repair responsibility shall be agreed by both parties in the lease contract Article 23 The lessee shall take care of and reasonably use the leased house and ancillary facilities, and shall not dismantle, alter, expand or add to it without authorization. If it is really necessary to make changes, the consent of the lessor must be obtained and a written contract must be signed.

If the house is damaged due to the fault of the tenant, the tenant shall be responsible for repairing or compensating.

The explanation of the regulations you have listed is a matter of safety and quality of the house! It's not the guest who creates the safety hazard!

First look at the rental contract, whether it stipulates that unqualified dangerous goods are not allowed to be used in the house.

If the risk arises from a leak in the gas pipe of the rental property, the landlord is responsible.

And what you are talking about is the use of substandard products due to the tenant's reasons, and the landlord is not legally held responsible.

The landlord bears 80 liability, the renter bears 15 liability, and the deceased bears 5 liability, even if the deceased's next of kin did not sue the renter.

If there is no railing in the house, the landlord is fully responsible, and if there is no railing in the corridor outside the house, the property is responsible.

If there is a problem with the renovation of the house, such as not setting up safety measures, the landlord needs to be responsible. But generally speaking, the landlord is not responsible. Because if the child is still young and has not reached adulthood, it must be supervised by a parent.