Virtue is not virtue is to be virtuous, and virtue is not to lose virtue, but to be virtuous How t

Shangde is the virtue of "doing nothing". Lao Tzu's "non-action" is not to do, but "to be born but not to have, to be for but not to be ashamed, and to work but not to live". The thirty-eighth chapter of Lao Tzu's "Tao Te Ching" has the following chapters and a few sentences:

To be virtuous or not to be virtuous is to be virtuous; Virtue is not lost, but there is no virtue. The upper virtue does nothing and does nothing, and the lower virtue does what it does. How do we understand these two poems?

That is to say, morality underpins the social order of reality and makes the world harmonious. At this time, virtue is the act and contribution to society, so it is a contribution to society, but it is not fighting for the social front because of the great contribution to society, but it is hidden behind society. Virtue inaction means that virtue does not exist in society and does not withdraw from society.

In fact, our interpretation does not seem to be easier to understand than the Bible.

They should let everyone know what is moral and what is immoral, and demand that people live by ethical standards and lives. It is clear that people are still living an immoral life. Otherwise, what's the point of moral propaganda

According to the theorem established by Lao Tzu, there is a mutually generative relationship between two sets of concepts and things. If there is no immorality, there is no need to regulate morality and correct the audio-visual. Nowadays, the prevalence of moralization is due to the prevalence of immorality in society.

Morality is embodied in order to correct and correct the immoral biases of today's society. This fully shows that society has not really achieved a good life. Therefore, "virtue is virtue".

In the social state of Xia De, we can understand morality, know what is moral and what is not. But it is precisely because in a society with low morals, immorality is common, that moral knowledge and preaching are indispensable.

In the social state of Shangde, there is no knowledge and preaching of morality, because there are no immoral behaviors and phenomena in the society of Shangde, and there is no reason for moral demonstration. Virtue exists only for eternal life. Without immortality, there is no virtue.

Therefore, there is no reason for it to act. This is what it means to "not want to forge ahead". On the contrary, in the social state of Chade, moral knowledge and sermons were indispensable.

It is precisely because of the prevalence of immorality and behavior in society that the reason for the existence of morality is to correct the deviation of immorality. That's why "do virtuous things with faith", that is, have reason to do virtuous things. As for the explanation of this article, most of you are playing with words again.

It's hard to believe that morality doesn't represent virtue. If we define Wuwei as "nothing to live on, nothing to rely on, nothing to do", we can have a more unified interpretation of the text.

There is no virtue in virtue, but there is virtue. Virtue is not lost, but there is no virtue. Meaning:

The high-level "virtue" does not emphasize the superficial "virtue", so it is the real "virtue". The low-level "virtue" thinks that it does not lose "virtue", so it is actually no "virtue". A truly virtuous person will not talk about virtue and deliberately prove his virtue with a certain behavior, which is the real virtuous person.

A person who is under virtue seems to be virtuous everywhere, and it seems appropriate to use the framework of virtue everywhere to compare, but in fact he is a person without virtue.

Meaning: the high-level "virtue" does not emphasize the superficial "virtue", so it is the real "virtue". The low-level "virtue" thinks that it does not lose "virtue", so it is actually no "virtue".

Shangde is the virtue of "doing nothing". So what is virtue "non-action"? We have discussed before that Lao Tzu's "non-action" is not non-doing, but "being born without being, for the sake of not being ashamed, and merit without dwelling".

Summary. This quote comes from Chapter 38 of Lao Tzu's Tao Te Ching, which means: "The highest virtue is unconsciously expressed, and the second level of virtue is consciously expressed."

However, if you just want to show your virtue, you will lose your true virtue. To put it simply, true noble character is not deliberately displayed, but is naturally manifested; And the lower virtues are only for the sake of performance, and have no real value in themselves. This sentence can guide us in our daily life, not to pretend and hypocritical behavior in order to show our goodness and nobility, but to guide our behavior with the true goodness and nobility of our hearts.

To be virtuous or not to be virtuous is to be virtuous; Virtue is not lost, but there is no virtue. How to understand this sentence?

What does it mean, a girlfriend sent it.

Did you show it to me, what does it mean?

This quote comes from Chapter 38 of Lao Tzu's Tao Te Ching, which means: "The highest virtue is unconsciously expressed, and the second level of virtue is consciously expressed." However, if you just want to show your virtue, you will lose your true virtue.

To put it simply, true noble character is not deliberately displayed, but is naturally manifested; And the lower virtues are only for the sake of performance, and have no real value in themselves. This sentence can guide us in our daily life, not to pretend and hypocritical behavior in order to show our goodness and nobility, but to guide our behavior with the true goodness and nobility of our hearts.

This woman's circle of friends is for seeing.

Male and female. Hello, I can't give you an accurate answer to this Generally, women's friends like this are for women.

Meaning: a person with "virtue" does not appear to be externally virtuous, so he is actually "virtuous"; People who possess "lower virtue" are manifested as external "Tao" and therefore do not actually have "virtue". From the Tao Te Ching

Chapter XXXVIII, the original text is as follows:

To be virtuous or not to be virtuous is to be virtuous; Virtue is not lost, but there is no virtue. Shangde does nothing but does nothing; Under virtue and inaction, there is thought. Shangren did not do anything for it; The righteousness is for it.

If you don't respond to it, you throw it with your arms crossed. Therefore, after losing morality, after losing morality, after losing morality, after losing benevolence, after losing benevolence, after righteousness, after losing righteousness. The husband is the one who is faithful, and the first of chaos.

Translation: A person who possesses "virtue" does not appear to be outwardly virtuous, so he is actually "virtuous"; People who possess "lower virtue" are manifested as external "Tao" and therefore do not actually have "virtue". People who are "virtuous" conform to nature and act unintentionally, and people who are "virtuous" conform to nature and have intentions.

The benevolent man wanted to do something but did not respond to him, so he raised his arms and forced others. Therefore, after losing the "Tao", there is "virtue", after losing "virtue", after losing "benevolence", after losing "benevolence", there is "righteousness", and after losing righteousness, there is courtesy. The "rite" is the product of a lack of faithfulness and the beginning of trouble.

"Lao Tzu" cloud: "If you are not virtuous, you think you are virtuous, and if you lose virtue when you are virtuous, you are not virtuous." Meaning:

Advocating morality, not caring about immediate gains and losses, so you can have gains; If we ignore morality, abandon morality, violate morality, are unwilling to give up personal interests, and care about personal gains and losses, we will gain nothing. This is an incisive dialectical principle, and it is also in line with Yili. To fight for profit is to fight for the public.

This is also doing nothing without doing anything, gaining nothing without gaining, not pursuing utilitarianism, and doing nothing unfavorable.

That's what it means!

Sorry for the mistake.

Re-translate for you.

To be virtuous or not to be virtuous is to be virtuous; Virtue is not lost, but there is no virtue" (Tao Te Ching, Chapter 38). What does this mean?

As the ontology that produces everything, the Tao itself is not obtained from anything ("the virtuous one, the one who is virtuous"), so it is called "virtuous and immoral"; Because it is not obtained from something more basic than it but can produce something else, it is said to be "virtuous." "Lower virtue" refers to the acquisition from the top of the chain of "birth", and if it is lost, it is called "loss of virtue". Since the "lower virtue" is gained, therefore, it will also be lost, which is the running characteristic of the Tao.

If "virtue is not lost", the Tao embodied by virtue and the gains and losses of virtue and virtue will not exist, and thus the "birth" of virtue from Tao will also be gone, that is, "there is no virtue". Lao Tzu "is not virtuous, it is to be virtuous; The sentence "Virtue is not lost, it is no virtue" is about the relationship between virtue and virtue in the metaphysics of virtue and virtue.

Look at me so tired.

You want to give it to me

Virtue does nothing, virtue does nothing, Shangren does nothing, Shangyi does nothing, and righteousness does it.

Lose virtue and then go down, lose virtue and then benevolence, lose benevolence and then righteousness, lose righteousness and etiquette does not exist (righteousness and then etiquette). Lao Tzu, Chapter 38.

Virtue, benevolence, righteousness, and propriety are the embodiment of the Tao, and dealing with different situations for different situations does not mean that there is no Tao in the world, and virtue is manifested, not that when benevolence and righteousness are preached and praised, the Tao is buried. A poem is well written: The wind and clouds change and the mountains and rivers move, and there is no way to ask the chivalrous wind.

Don't ask who is worthy of the dragon, and sigh at the sky. Chivalrous.

Because the benevolent person loves others and saves sentient beings, and the virtuous person does not save sentient beings for the sake of loving others, so benevolence will lose virtue, so lose the way and then go down to virtue, lose virtue and then benevolence, lose benevolence and then righteousness.

The so-called injustice and propriety do not exist, propriety, and law. Righteousness, reason. It is the most practical and suitable product for the social situation. Therefore, we should govern the country according to law and rule the country by virtue. Etiquette and righteousness must not be lost.

The so-called injustice and then etiquette are probably only used in court, and some legal principles are not uniform in life.