Which is handsome R17 or R17Pro

R17Pro is handsome.

In terms of photography, R17 still has a certain gap compared with R17 Pro, OPPO R17 has a 25 million pixel camera on the front, and a 16 million + 5 million pixel dual camera on the rear. The R17 Pro also has a 25 million pixel camera on the front, and a 12 million pixel camera + 20 million pixel camera + TOF 3D stereo camera on the rear, and the rear main camera is an intelligent variable aperture, and the image configuration is much higher than that of R17.

In terms of battery capacity, R17's battery capacity is 3400mAh, and R17 Pro's is 2*1850mAh, which is equivalent to 3700mAh battery energy, supports SuperVOOC super flash charging, and the charging power can reach up to 50W, compared to R17, battery capacity and charging speed are also a big advantage of R17 Pro.

The most important difference is here:R17 uses Qualcomm Snapdragon 670SoC,And R17 Pro is Qualcomm Snapdragon 710SoC,In terms of processor, it is directly up a notch,The overall performanceR17 Pro must be much stronger,**In terms of wordsR17 is 3199 yuan,And R17 Pro is4299 yuan,This** is only a little lower than OPPO Find X,I don't know if R17 Pro can be called?

Personally, I think that if you have the money to buy R17 Pro, it is better to add a few hundred dollars to buy the OPPO Find X, after all, the Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 is the real flagship, and the appearance of the OPPO Find X is basically no mobile phone that can match it at present.

In terms of exterior color schemes, the OPPOR17 series has added a new color scheme, which is a magical color gradient. The color feels really cool when listening to the name, and the actual effect is beautiful, whereas the R17Pro uses fog. The light gradient color, the light and shadow effect is very unique, and due to the use of light curtain fingerprint recognition, the traditional fingerprint recognition module can not be seen in the front and back of the mobile phone, the integration is more intense, and the beauty of the body is greatly improved!

In terms of photography, R17 still has a certain gap compared with R17 Pro, OPPO R17 has a 25 million pixel camera on the front, and a 16 million + 5 million pixel dual camera on the rear. The R17 Pro also has a 25 million pixel camera on the front, and a 12 million pixel camera + 20 million pixel camera + TOF 3D stereo camera on the rear, and the rear main camera is an intelligent variable aperture, and the image configuration is much higher than that of R17.

Partner: OPPO mobile phone does not have R17Plus, this model, Oh, R17, screen size: inch water drop screen.

Resolution: 2340*1080

Screen-to-body ratio: pixel density: 402ppi

Touchscreen Material: Corning Gorilla Glass 6.

Display material: AMOLED

R17 Camera:

Front: 25 million AI smart beautification, F aperture;

Rear: 16 million (f 10,000 (f smart dual camera.)

The R17 uses the ColorOS system, which was developed based on Android.

The R17 Pro features an inch waterdrop screen.

Resolution: 2340*1080

Pixel density: 402ppi

Display material: AMOLED

Screen-to-body ratio: R17 Pro front: 25 million pixel camera, aperture;

Rear: 12 million pixel camera (aperture) + 20 million pixel camera (aperture) + TOF 3D stereo camera.

With a smart aperture, optical image stabilization, and a large-size sensor with all-pixel focus, coupled with an AI ultra-clear engine, you can clearly record the charm of the night and discover the beauty of the night.

The R17 Pro is equipped with a ColorOS system based on Android. NFC function is supported.

Advantages: good appearance, okay to take pictures, good screen color.

Disadvantages: The performance is average, the camera does not have an ultra-wide-angle and telephoto lens, and it is not cost-effective.

I don't think it's worth buying.

In terms of processor, it uses Snapdragon's mid-range processor, Snapdragon 670, this processor has medium performance, and it is not completely outdated this year, but it will be a completely outdated processor next year or the year after. This processor has a certain gap in performance with flagship processors such as Snapdragon 845 and Snapdragon 855. And this processor is not as good as the Snapdragon 660 in CPU performance, and the GPU performance is much stronger than the Snapdragon 660.

It should be regarded as a processor that focuses on GPU performance. Due to the average CPU performance, in daily use, the speed of opening software, etc. may be slow, and there may be occasional lag, and by next year or the year after, the software will have higher requirements for the CPU, and at that time, this processor will be a little outdated and stuck. So if you want to use it for more than 2 or 3 years, then this phone is not very suitable, and you should buy flagship phones with Snapdragon 855, such as Xiaomi Mi 9, iQOO, Meizu 16S and other mobile phones.

In terms of screen, it uses Samsung's AMOLED screen, which is better in color, and it is a relatively high-end screen, with better visual effects, bright colors, and more pleasing to the eye. And the design of the waterdrop screen also has an ultra-narrow chin, which makes the OPPO R17 have a high screen-to-body ratio.

In terms of cameras,OPPO R17 is equipped with12 million + 5 million dual camera,This parameter is a bit backward at present,Now the mainstream flagship mobile phones are all using Sony's 48 million pixel main camera,In terms of imaging effect, it is much stronger than the camera on OPPO R17,In 48 million pixel mode,You can get very good resolution,The image is still very clear after being magnified many times,And OPPO R17 can't do it。 And the Oppo R17 doesn't have an ultra-wide angle and telephoto lens, so it's limited in terms of usage scenarios, and it can't shoot a wider range or achieve lossless zoom.

I don't think the Oppo R17 is well worth buying, and it's already a bit behind in terms of performance and photography.

Not recommended. OPPO's R series and vivo's X series are the same as the main sales models of offline distribution, which can sell tens of millions of mobile phones every year, basically with this as the main force, 2018 is no exception, R17 has an excellent appearance, and the same full-screen design that follows the trend more, coupled with the strong dominance of offline stores, there are still a lot of people who buy.

This mobile phone is indeed very beautiful in terms of appearance,The center of the dual camera design in the back,Plus a beautiful back panel,It's really amazing,At the same time, the water drop screen in front is also transitioning naturally,It doesn't look abrupt,It also has a high screen-to-body ratio,The appearance is indeed the advantage of the green factory,So girls often love this mobile phone very much。

But in terms of cost performance, it is not worth recommending, equipped with Snapdragon 6 series processor, it is indeed relatively backward in terms of performance, and its camera is only 20 million pixels, which is a big step behind in the mobile phone at the same price, plus its pricing of about 3000, there is indeed a suspicion of IQ identification, so it is not worth buying.

oppor17 I don't think it's worth buying. We know the cost performance from the comparison of her advantages and disadvantages.

1. Advantages. The appearance is fashionable and good-looking, to be honest, I think her appearance is the best looking in the same level of mobile phones, and the screen is a waterdrop screen.

2. Disadvantages. Only face recognition is supported, although this is faster than fingerprint unlocking, but this operation will be silly in a crowded place. And there is no infrared, which means that you have to fill in the light for face recognition in the dark light.

The function of mobile phone vibration is too light, and it is easy to ignore it if it is not loud enough.

There is fingerprint recognition under the display, but it is not accurate enough, resulting in a bit slow. Not suitable for playing large games and easy to freeze, here I want to complain about her configuration, the mobile phone at this price is actually equipped with a Snapdragon 670 processor.

Comparison of the above advantages and disadvantages, I can buy a mobile phone with better performance and better configuration than him like R17, such as OnePlus and Xiaomi, although the appearance is not as good-looking as her.

R17 is a constantly upgraded version of the R series, the advantage is that it is ultra-clear to take pictures as always, if you like to take pictures, it is a very good choice, the disadvantage is, because the main focus is on taking pictures, so the configuration is low, and the cost performance is not high. Well worth buying.

The advantage of the R17 is that it is cheap and full of features, and the disadvantage is that the battery life is poor and the camera pixels are relatively poor, but overall it is a good phone.

The advantages of R17 are: large memory of the mobile phone, ** discount, good pixel of the mobile phone.

The disadvantage of R17 is: the processor of the mobile phone is relatively poor, and it is easy to freeze.

It's worth buying.

I am the victim, I can't buy R17, and everyone who buys it will definitely regret it, don't buy it. Fingerprints can't be unlocked, several times can be successful once, it's too inconvenient, every time you enter the password, it's troublesome, and I'm afraid of others peeking.

The advantage is that it is not expensive, the memory is large, and the photos are good, and the disadvantage is that the processor is not cost-effective, and I think it is still worth buying.

Bad reviews of the processor, there are basically no flaws in the others, it's okay to take pictures, and the level of the flagship machine.

Advantages: Super night shooting technology and super flash charging.

Disadvantages: The configuration is not good, ** more expensive.

Personally, I don't think it's worth buying.

I think it's well worth buying because I'm using oppor17.

I use it, it is not recommended to buy, ** low configuration.

Personally, I don't think it's worth buying, although it is excellent in terms of appearance and pixels, it is slightly lacking in terms of processors, and it can only be considered mediocre. In addition, it doesn't have an ultra-wide angle or an ultra-long zoom, which is still far behind the rest of its peers in this regard.