What are the laws governing when the aircraft is located in different countries?

On domestic flights, it is generally handled by the airport ** where the landing place is made, regardless of whether the perpetrator is domestic or foreign, for example, someone on the flight from Beijing to Shanghai is suspected of stealing, then it will be investigated by Shanghai** after landing.

On international flights, it is handled by the ** of the country where the landing place is located, regardless of whether the perpetrator is a domestic or foreign, such as a Chinese flight to the United States, there is a Chinese suspected of stealing, then after landing by the United States ** for investigation, regardless of the current flight to ** (unless the aircraft lands in the middle of the flight for special reasons), if his behavior on the plane has violated US law, then accept the sanctions of US law; If his behavior on the plane only violates Chinese law, but does not violate US law, the United States cannot touch him, and the personnel on the Chinese plane cannot do anything to him (this is also the most difficult part of handling aircraft theft cases, and stealing items within $100 in some countries is not enough to be a crime of theft, and the landing country cannot arrest him, but can only release the stolen goods after confiscating them).

Putting the gangway means that the plane has landed, and where to land is managed by the ** there.

The upstairs was very professional and studied.

Article 6 of the Criminal Law: This Law applies to all crimes committed within the territory of the People's Republic of China, except as otherwise provided by law.

This Law also applies to any crime committed on board a ship or aircraft of the People's Republic of China.

Check out these hope it helps you.

If it has landed, it will generally be handled by the Australian side, but if the person involved is a non-Australian person, the Australian consulate of the country where the nationality of the person involved is located also has the right to intervene, but it should still be mainly Australian.

If useful.

No, it depends on the agreement, and the law of the country that the agreement stipulates will apply!

Generally, for the sake of fairness, we specifically choose to use the law of a third country as the applicable law, for example, we sign a sales contract with the United States, and the dispute resolution agreement is to choose the Stockholm arbitration institution in Switzerland for arbitration.

Generally, the agreement is greater than the statutory one, but it cannot violate the mandatory provisions of the law, so it depends on your specific contract.

This sentence is true, this is the judge's free will.

However, it should be Montesquieu ...

Provisions on the registration of nationality of civil aircraft, as provided for in Article 28.

All aircraft are the same.

Without such provisions, how can foreign aircraft be Chinese territory, that is not messy.

There are different provisions on the jurisdiction of aircraft. For China, the airspace where the plane flies is China's territory, and the aircraft is based on the flag country.

Foreign planes flying to China are not China's territory, but because they occupy airspace or ground, and these belong to our territory. According to the principle of territorial jurisdiction, China can manage it, but in international practice, the affairs on board the aircraft are under the jurisdiction of the country of its nationality (the aircraft also has a nationality, and the flag of the country it flies is its nationality state, referred to as the flag state).