When your mother in law is sick, will you spend all your savings to save her?

I was willing to spend all my savings to save her, but the final decision was in my husband's hands.

Regardless of mother-in-law and daughter-in-law Whether the relationship is harmonious, when she is hospitalized due to illness, I am willing to give my savings for the whole family. But the decision on this matter is not in my hands, and I think I will support my husband's decision on what to do.

I don't want to leave my husband with regrets in his life, so I'm willing to spend all my savings to save her. As children, we should be filial to our parents. But for a daughter-in-law, it is false to say that there is no conflict with her mother-in-law.

But when my mother-in-law was really hospitalized because of her illness, I think I was willing to use the family's savings to save her life.

This is not a difficult decision to make, because the integrity of a family is far more important than money. If I struggle too much in this regard, I think my husband will be even more entangled in his heart.

I don't want him to have too many regrets, and I don't want him to spend the rest of his life in regret. So I'm not going to be an obstacle, and if he's willing to spend all his savings to save his mother, I'm certainly not going to stop it.

My husband should be in charge, not me. In this family, the small family problems between the two of us, of course, can be decided by me. However, when it comes to whether or not to spend all your savings to treat your mother-in-law, it is better for the husband to make the decision on this kind of issue.

Whatever decision I make, I don't think it makes sense if my husband doesn't agree. But as long as he is willing to make this decision, whether he chooses to spend all his savings for treatment or choose another path, I will support his decision and will not become an obstacle.

As a daughter-in-law, I will definitely do the best I can. But this kind of thing really shouldn't be up to me to make the final choice.

In fact, in a family, when it comes to parental issues, no matter what choice the daughter-in-law makes, she will inevitably be blamed. Rather than be the one to be blamed on, it is better to put the choice back in the hands of your husband from the beginning.

Life has to go on, and no matter which path he chooses to take, I can accept it calmly.

No. My husband can spend all his savings to treat his mother, but I won't spend all my savings, because if I don't have a dollar to buy steamed buns, my daughter and I will be hungry, and people are indifferent.

I will. Because I think my mother-in-law is very good to me, and when my mother-in-law is in trouble, I should also spend all my savings to save her.

No, because I was sick, not only did she not take the money, but she also scolded me for being a broom star, saying that I hurt her son and spent her son's money.

I probably won't, I'll save some living expenses for my family, and then use most of my savings to treat her, after all, there is a big family to live on.

I will save her, because money is something outside of the body, and it is better to save someone's life, and she can continue to earn money when it is gone.

I will spend all my savings to save her, because I have to be hearty in everything I do, if it is my own parents, I will do this, and I will do the same for my husband's parents, so that it can be fair.

No, we can choose to use the drip chip, we don't need to spend all our savings, and some diseases may be long gone.

I wouldn't do that because I feel like I need money to sustain my life, and I don't want my mother-in-law to drag down my family.

I'll spend all my savings to save her. Only in this way can the husband be more grateful to himself, and the relationship between the two will be more stable.

Yes, my mother-in-law is sick, I definitely can't die without saving her, I will definitely do everything I can to save her.

Depending on her attitude towards me, she will naturally try her best to save her if she treats me well, otherwise there is no need for that.

I should have done this, because I felt that since I married the other party, I was the other party's relatives, and I would definitely take care of the other party's mother.

If spending all his savings can save him, he will definitely do it, after all, filial piety to the old man should also be done.

As long as you can save it, you will definitely save it. Think about it from another perspective, if your own mother is seriously ill, what do you want your other half to choose? Treat people with sincerity and compare hearts with hearts.

Of course I will do this, after all, my mother-in-law is very good to me, and there is affection between the two of them.

No, his son didn't give me any money.

It's not your own mother, the person who asks this question, let me ask you a question, if your wife's mother and your real mother are sick at the same time, your savings can only be one person, who do you save?

If the mother-in-law is sick, will the husband spend all his savings to save her?

My personal advice is to stay with my mother-in-law to take care of him, and then let my husband go out to work to earn money, because girls are more likely to take care of others, so I think this method is the most feasible.

The mother-in-law has no legal obligation to take care of her daughter-in-law when she is sick, because according to the Civil Code, there is no provision for a daughter-in-law to take care of and support her mother-in-law, and it is the legal obligation of the child to support her parents, not the legal obligation of the daughter-in-law. But morally, the daughter-in-law should take care of her mother-in-law, and the daughter-in-law can support her mother-in-law if she voluntarily supports her.

[Legal basis].Article 1067 of the Civil Code of the People's Republic of China.

If the parents do not fulfill the obligation to support the parents, the minor children or the adult children who are unable to live independently have the right to demand that the parents pay child support.

Parents who fail to fulfill their obligation to support their adult children, or who lack the ability to work or who have difficulties in living, have the right to demand maintenance from their adult children.

Legal analysis: Generally, children are taken care of, and daughters-in-law can also be used, but from a legal point of view, there is no article that clearly stipulates that daughters-in-law have the obligation to support their in-laws, and it is not a violation of the law not to support their in-laws. Article 1129 of the Civil Code of the People's Republic of China: Where a widowed daughter-in-law has fulfilled the primary obligation of support to her parents-in-law or a widowed son-in-law to her parents-in-law, she shall be the first-order heir.

Legal basis: Article 1129 of the Civil Code of the People's Republic of China: Where a widowed daughter-in-law has fulfilled the primary obligation of support to her parents-in-law, or a widowed son-in-law has fulfilled the primary obligation of support, she shall be the first-order heir.