Are philosophers all thinkers, and do those who study philosophy love to think 10

Philosophers are not necessarily thinkers, philosophers study the relationship between consciousness and matter, mainly look at the universe, thinking and nature from a macroscopic perspective, and find out the universal laws of nature, society, and thinking, such as Kant and Hegel, while the history of thought mainly studies society, criticizes society, finds out the contradictions and loopholes in the existing society, studies society from the principles and policies of social systems and rulers, and expresses his own views through writing, discussion, and speeches, such as Voltaire, who is a great thinker, By writing a large number of books criticizing the decadent ideas and dark and backward feudal dynasties in French society at that time, the church promoted social development and social progress, but he was not a philosopher. Dale Carnegie once said, "Thinking produces new knowledge." That's why philosophers and thinkers love to think.

So philosophers and thinkers have both similarities and differences!

Philosophers and thinkers are both thinkers, the difference is that philosophers have their own system of thought and systematize it, while thinkers are people who are good at thinking and learning, they may have their own theoretical system, but they can not be systematized and made into a model for others to learn, they can be called philosophers and thinkers, they have a very deep foundation.

This problem? I'm going to have a good time,!What about from an outsider's point of view?

Philosophers? Well, there is money,!Life must be comfortable,!

It's also the idea of the masses,!What about the philosophers themselves? Maybe the situation is different!

He needs to think about the problem from time to time, !It's either this question or that problem,!Thinking in silence every day,!

It's the gods who should be tired, too!Hey.

There are three main differences between a thinker and a philosopher: character, class nature, and direction.

1. Features. <>

A thinker is a person who has studied extensively at multiple levels, or whose ideas can be constructed into a complete body of thought.

A philosopher refers to a scholar who has his own philosophical paradigm, original philosophical basic theories and philosophical systems.

2. Class nature.

The focus of the thinker's thinking is to care for humanity, and the motivation is to pursue his own pursuit. Thinkers also seek pleasure, but they understand that power and wealth can kill their own unique ideas.

The focus of philosophers' thinking is how to combine various knowledge to form a complete set of knowledge system with a level of ecological harmony, so that people can refer to it and think more harmoniously and fully about various problems. Philosophy is more about wanting to create a kind of mental ability.

3. **Direction.

The scope of research of thinkers is relatively broader, including religion, philosophy, political science, psychology, education, sociology, economics, history, etc., and some thinkers will also study theories in the fields of military theory and cosmology, add their own ideological systems, and form their own theories.

Philosophers explore the field of theoretically based on the universe, neutrinos, etc., and then the study of inorganic matter, organic matter, living matter, and even the entire human society itself.

The above content reference: Encyclopedia - The Thinker.

The above content reference: Encyclopedia - Philosophers.

Philosophers simply interpret the world in different ways, which is the only way for philosophers to engage in philosophy. Everyone has their own way of interpreting the world, and philosophers just put these thoughts into a system. The reason why there are different ways is because everyone's worldview is different.

After explaining the world, there are also philosophers who have proposed ways to change the world, the most famous such as Plato's ideal state, and others such as Utopia, Sun City, etc. But the difference between the philosopher and reality lies in the fact that the philosopher's activity is in the mind, and he does not have a powerful force to put his ideas into practice. Moreover, due to the constraints of practical conditions, it is impossible to prove the correctness of the philosopher's ideal with practice, so there will always be a gap between the ideal and the reality that cannot be crossed.

So philosophers can only go deeper to the root of this "chasm". Plato once proposed the concept of a "philosopher-king". There are also those who almost put it into practice, and that is Marcus Aurelius (Meditations.

But the philosopher-king is an unattainable realm, because in reality there are many conditions (in reality Marcus Aurelius abdicated the throne and ruled with his cousin), so what both philosophers (and writers) lack is a highly developed social and spiritual dimension, as well as strong legal guarantees. However, the two are contradictory at the same time. Therefore, philosophers can only look inward for answers, rather than change a corner of the world with a small force.