How to view the current social security situation in China, where there is a huge disparity between

This is inevitable, first, the state has limited funds and a large population, second, the hard work is different, and the social value produced is also different, so the treatment enjoyed is also different, and third, there is arable land in the countryside, while the urban population only has a subsistence allowance. If there is no subsistence allowance, the rural areas can at least have something to eat, and the poor in the cities can only starve to death

Rural Social Security China's rural population accounts for the majority of the country's population, and the level of economic development is low. In rural areas, land is both a means of production and a means of subsistence; The land is collectively owned, and the household responsibility system is implemented. Influenced by historical and traditional culture, rural areas have a long-term tradition of family support, self-protection, and family mutual assistance.

In accordance with the characteristics of rural economic and social development, the State implements social security measures in rural areas that are different from those in urban areas.

In fact, now the social security in the countryside is more perfect than in the city, but it is not implemented, it is still very bad, I heard that in medical care, education how many billions of dollars are allocated by the state every year, but what about the final money? What about money?

Personal opinion. 1 The object of social security, logically speaking, should be the whole people, based on China's current financial resources, as well as the implementation of the dual system of urban and rural areas, our country's focus is on the towns, such as basic medical insurance for urban residents, work-related injury insurance, unemployment insurance, but for rural areas, has begun to tilt, such as the rural cooperative medical system. At present, the method of subsidizing at all levels has begun to encourage farmers to participate in insurance.

2 Generally speaking, China's current social security system, whether in rural areas or in urban areas, is at a low level of relatively low coverage, and of course the situation in urban areas is better. The existence of the urban-rural duality mechanism has contributed to social and economic development, but in fact it has caused inequality between urban and rural areas. Under the limited financial resources, of course, it is to give priority to urban residents and sacrifice the interests of peasants.

Secondly, regarding the payment of premiums, in accordance with the principle of tripartite sharing between employers and individuals, in cities, individuals still have less burdens, but in rural areas, in the mode of production of farming, premiums are actually a very heavy share. In addition, there is a traditional belief that security itself is intended to increase people's psychological expectations of safety and prevent risks, and in cities, where most of the inhabitants are employed, the danger is greater in the case of large-scale production and its operations. However, rural peasants have a certain amount of security when they have land, and relatively speaking, the risk is relatively small, which is of course a traditional view and is not correct.

The gap between the level of social security between urban and rural areas is huge, but the state has invested huge financial resources in solving it in recent years. For example, in terms of social insurance, the New Rural Cooperative Medical System, you will also find that there is too much investment in rural social welfare, for example, focusing on the elderly, there will be some subsidies and so on. At present, China's social security system artificially divides urban and rural areas, resulting in an uncoordinated system, and all localities are currently exploring how to integrate the distinct urban and rural social security systems.

This is a hot issue.

A lot of people need attention. In fact, many low-income groups in urban areas cannot afford to participate in social insurance, and the issue of undertaking and transferring social insurance for landless farmers in rural areas and migrant workers in urban areas is a hot topic.

The gap between urban and rural areas in social security is mainly reflected in the following aspects:

1.Pension insurance: The pension insurance for urban residents is coordinated nationwide, and the basic pension level is relatively high, while the pension insurance coverage rate for rural residents is low, and the pension level of the basic sales department is low.

2.Medical insurance: The medical insurance for urban residents is large-scale, wide-ranging, and has a high reimbursement ratio, while the medical insurance for rural residents is small-scale, narrow-coverage, and has a low reimbursement ratio.

3.Unemployment insurance: The unemployment insurance coverage rate of urban residents is relatively high, while the unemployment insurance coverage rate of rural residents is relatively high, and the level of unemployment insurance premiums is low.

4.Social assistance: Urban residents can enjoy various social assistance and subsidies, such as subsistence allowance and assistance for people living in extreme poverty, while rural residents have relatively few social assistance and subsidies.

5.Housing security: Urban residents can purchase commercial housing or apply for public rental housing and other hidden housing security measures, while rural residents have relatively little housing security.

In short, the social security gap between urban and rural areas is mainly reflected in the areas of old-age care, medical care, unemployment, social assistance and housing. In order to narrow the gap between urban and rural social security, it is necessary to increase investment and support for social security for rural residents, expand the coverage of social security for rural residents, raise the level of old-age, medical and unemployment insurance benefits, and increase social assistance and housing security for rural residents.

The gap between urban and rural areas in social security is mainly reflected in the following aspects:

1.Medical and health care: There is a gap between urban residents' medical insurance and rural cooperative medical care in terms of payment ratio, reimbursement scope, and types of drugs.

2.Old-age security: There are many elderly people in rural areas, but the rural social old-age insurance system is imperfect and the popularity is low, resulting in a large number of rural elderly people lacking old-age security.

3.Unemployment security: The structure and characteristics of the urban and rural labor markets are different, and migrant workers may not be able to obtain unemployment assistance after becoming unemployed, but urban workers often have a more complete unemployment security system and more employment opportunities.

4.Social assistance: In terms of family difficulties, sudden accidents, natural disasters, etc., urban and rural residents are faced with the problem of lack of emergency assistance and social security system.

To sum up, the gap between urban and rural social security is widespread in medical care, deep answer to old-age care, unemployment, social assistance, etc., and it is necessary to further improve the social security level of rural residents and promote the equitable development of urban and rural areas.

Personal opinion, chat.

1.Social security. Because there are too many Chinese, it is difficult for everyone to achieve the same security or other benefits.

City people pay their own insurance, and of course they should be protected. People in the cities live in a concentrated area, so it is worthwhile to build public facilities, while there are some rural people who live in scattered areas.

2.I don't think there is a difference between rural and urban. Rural people live a better life than urban people, they eat all green food, eat their own food and vegetables, and what they eat can never be eaten by people in the city, so they are happier than in the city.

Rural people only have less pocket money in their hands, so they will go to the city to make a living.

3.The most important concern should be the disadvantaged groups in the city. Because, if the rural people can't go on, they still have land and a way out; And city people can't get by, but there is really nothing to retreat.

Personally, I feel that the current social security in our country cannot reach the level of benefiting the whole people, there are too many Chinese, and the funds that need to be invested in social security should be a very huge amount, and it is unrealistic to make the whole people enjoy social security at present. In the past, urban residents enjoyed more social security than rural residents, and there was a big gap, but through the state's policy of supporting and benefiting farmers in recent years, it is believed that this gap will gradually narrow. First of all, the state needs to find ways to stabilize and lower prices, and solve the contradiction between low income and high consumption.

At present, the sense of service of the local government is generally poor, and the ability to solve practical problems for the people is low, and all administrative departments attach importance to how to deal with the inspection work of the higher levels, and do not start from the perspective of the grassroots level to solve problems and do practical things for the people. The administrative organs in the cities and towns are relatively sound, the role of window services is relatively obvious, and all kinds of social services are relatively sound, while most of the service organizations in the rural areas are not sound, their staffing is incomplete, and their conditions are relatively poor.

First of all, it is a question of the philosophy of statecraft, that is, what happens after taking power.

Zhi looks at those workers and peasants who have contributed to the motherland, and that is a matter of political consideration. In the final analysis, the difference between workers and peasants, between urban and rural areas, between collective state-owned enterprises, and so on is a difference in interests, and there is no reason for this system to be set up as you should be poor and I should be rich. At present, some rural areas already have agricultural insurance, and there is a difference between agricultural insurance and urban insurance, that is, the difference between social classes.

The reason for these differences is the fundamental reason, China is an imperial society, the privileged class wants to enjoy, from the **, you have the right, you have the qualifications to exploit others, why is the civil service examination now vigorous, even primary school students know to be a captain, because that is also an official, you can add points when you take the exam, only in a legalized society, it is possible to change this status quo, Clinton and Lewinsky's sexual behavior during his tenure, either you admit your mistake and apologize, or you **, There are no unspoken rules, everything is under the sun, we have not yet entered this realm, and now we can't even do the best property declaration, and it is so difficult to make financial disclosure, so if you want to narrow the gap between urban and rural areas, then the privileged class does not exist.