Recently, there has been a quality problem with the Canon entry level machine

Many people say that DSLRs (even card players) choose Canon Nikon, and I generally agree. But seriously, I'm the first choice for Nikon, followed by Canon! Imaging aside, Canon (actually at the same level, but in different styles), Canon's quality is indeed inferior to Nikon's, and Canon's user complaints are far greater than Nikon's when their market share is not much different!

My card machine and SLR are both Nikon, SLR is 05 produced D200, some time ago also tested once, CCD 30 seconds no bad point; The most used by my colleagues is also Nikon, and none of them have problems.

Therefore, it is recommended that you choose D90! It may be out of stock if it's too late, and now ** has fallen to the lowest point.

First of all, you didn't understand the grade of the machine when you chose the machine, D90 is the mid-range machine, 550D is the entry machine, D3100 is the bottom of the entry machine, 600D is the improvement of 550D, of course, it is still the entry machine, there is no doubt that D90 is much better than these machines, whether it is workmanship, durability, shutter use, number of available lenses, operation convenience, etc. D90 is about to be discontinued, if you want to buy it, hurry up, the cost performance is very good.

Pentax KR, K5 (parallel import).

Nikon D7000

It's still D90, now is the time for good value for money. Although the pixels are lower than 550d and 600d, they are still higher than 550d and 600d in all aspects. It's not a machine of the same grade.

As for the D3100, it is a little lower than the 550D, so there is no need to think about it.

What I want to say is that Canon's unilateral sales are too good, so it's not surprising that the complaint rate is higher than Nikon's.

Some people's character is just bad! Just ask no, and don't respect the kindness and labor of others at all. Everyone only asks no, who will help you in the future?

The probability of problems with the SLR camera is relatively small, but I am afraid of defective products.

Whether it is a parallel import called "Hong Kong Bank", or a licensed cargo, or a real Hong Kong bank, if you exclude the possibility of the influence of the merchant (such as second-hand goods, refurbished goods), and then exclude the influence of the producer (such as the specifications of different factories or the individual differences of finished products caused by errors in molds or processes in the unified plant), the quality and workmanship of the three are actually the same. It's the same in this regard.

To further speak, the production model of electronic products (presumably except in Germany) is OEM. That is, it is authorized to live in a factory in a country with cheap labor, and produce according to the drawings and standards required by the merchant. The products produced should have been transported to designated countries for sale, but they were transported to other countries and bypassed customs and entered the territory for sale, which is the so-called parallel import.

The products of different origins may be different, because according to the development strategy of different brands, the distribution of production areas will be different.

For example, the Bank of China ("A] is made in China, but the parallel goods are made in China (B), and the licensed goods shipped to Hong Kong may be made in China. And brand B may be a domestic product regardless of whether it is a national bank, a Hong Kong bank, or parallel goods. And these are difficult to know as a consumer.

We don't know exactly how each brand has its production lines.

Therefore, unless we find out the origin when we inspect the product when we buy the product and we ourselves know the product quality level of this origin, it is of little significance. The clear difference between the national bank, parallel goods and Hong Kong bank can be confirmed is the difference between accessories and after-sales. Among them, both the Bank of China and the Hong Kong Bank can enjoy a certain degree of warranty service locally, and the accessories can be guaranteed to be original.

However, due to regional differences, some accessories will have differences (e.g. power adapters).

Of course, this is all based on the premise that the brand itself has invested in after-sales service, such as Pentax, the brand basically has no investment in after-sales, that is, if you have a problem to warranty, you will be pit a lot of money for various reasons, or the repair efficiency is extremely low, then it is no different from buying parallel goods. Parallel goods are not eligible for warranty service, but some stores will promise store warranty, which depends on the reputation of the store, and some powerful stores are even the same official maintenance points as licensed goods.

Therefore, as a consumer, the advice I can give you is: if you have a good budget and want to buy without worry, and you want to worry about after-sales, you can choose BNM. If you don't have a lot of budget, or you have enough knowledge or experience, or you have a familiar technician to inspect the goods, and you have the awareness to go to a repair shop to repair at your own risk, buying parallel goods will be more cost-effective.

Canon's SLR has a very low chance of being bad, as long as it has not been dropped, parallel goods are the same except for the warranty.

It's very unlikely, anyway, I know and I haven't met anyone else.

Parallel goods are still trustworthy, don't worry.

Pay attention to maintenance: Prepare a cleaning kit, a moisture-proof box, and a photography bag.

There is not much difference between parallel goods and licensed goods, and there is no need.

It's not big, as long as it's genuine, it's not a renovation, it should be okay, and the rest depends on the character.

Hello! We recommend the Canon S100V, a top-of-the-line card player that claims to be "high-sensitivity (night scene) shooting, with image quality comparable to that of a DSLR".

The Canon S100V is equipped with a 1-inch image sensor and Canon's latest DigiC 5 image processor (the processing speed of the DigiC 5 is 6 times that of the DigiC 4, and the high-sensitivity image quality has been improved by 2-3 stops, which greatly improves the image processing and noise reduction capabilities. The response and focusing speed of the machine is faster than that of the higher Canon G12, and the image processing function is better.

The Canon S100V is compact and easy to carry, weighing only 169 grams, while combining high image quality and portability.

The machine has both full manual and automatic operation modes, whether it is a photography enthusiast or a novice who does not understand photography skills, you can easily shoot with excellent imaging quality**.

The powerful high-speed continuous shooting ability of the machine has reached a single second, which is stronger than some SLR models, and it is also a piece of cake to capture some fast-moving scenes.

I think the 255 is perfectly sufficient, the graphics processor is also very good, and the picture quality is good.

I've got a 115 that looks pretty good, so I think the 255 is perfectly fine, it's small and easy to use.

It's okay in the card machine, and the cost performance is good, but I don't want to shoot any good results at night.

If you pay attention to picture quality, especially night scenes, the Sony RX100 is preferred, followed by the Canon S110V. If you are sensitive to **, choose IXUS255.

The model you are talking about is very good, and it is also moderate.

Hello! Rest assured, the machine is fine.

When we use the camera to shoot, adjust the camera lens, so that the scene at a certain distance from the camera is clearly imaged, called focus, the point where the scene is located, called the focus point, because "clear" is not an absolute concept, therefore, the image of the scene before and after a certain distance can be clear, the sum of the front and back range, is called depth of field, which means that as long as the scene within this range, can be clearly photographed, Beyond this range, it cannot be photographed clearly.

If you zoom in a little closer to about 1 meter, you won't be able to autofocus, it's blurry" - The reason is that the object is taken too closely, falling outside the depth of field range of the telephoto end of the lens, and the shooting method you use happens to be the "shallow depth of field" operation method (the depth of field of telephoto and close range are the shallowest ones).

The longer the focal length of the lens, the shallower the depth of field; The shorter the focal length, the greater the depth of field;

The farther the distance, the greater the depth of field; The closer you are, the shallower the depth of field.

The focus range of your camera: Wide: 50mm-infinity, Telephoto:

1m-infinity means that when you turn the light to the maximum, that is, when the image is pulled closest, the shortest focusing distance is 1m, only greater than 1m can focus, less than 1m can not focus.

You can get the lens more than 1m away from the subject and you'll be able to focus.

Look at the very front of the lens. The distance you said was 1m, and then you zoomed it in, counting that the lens has been extended, so the distance is less than 1m at this time.

Just stay away.

You're adjusting the focal length, and when the focal length changes, of course, the clarity of the image changes.

Let's change it, that could be a problem with the lens.

750d 760d white spot problem.

Lensrentals previously reported a number of cases of dust particles in Canon** SLR 750D and 760D, On the evening of May 8, Canon (China) issued an announcement on its official website to respond to the problem, confirming the existence of the problem, and saying that the camera with the problem can be checked and responded to for free. However, the specific "correspondence" arrangement will be notified separately.

Strange dust particles appear on some of the machine sensors.

The following is the original text of the announcement:

We found that in some products of the DSLR cameras EOS 750D and EOS 760D, there is a white spot inside the optical unit in front of the imaging sensor. The following is an explanation of how to deal with this matter.

Phenomenon. Some of the target products have white spots inside the optical unit in front of the imaging sensor. Under certain shooting conditions, a white dot may appear inside the optical unit in rare cases, and a black dot pattern may appear on the captured **.

Applicable products. Some products of the DSLR EOS 750D and EOS 760D.

The first two digits from the left are some of the 01 or 02 cameras.

In addition, among the products with the first two digits from the left of the serial number of the fuselage being 01 or 02, the products marked with the mark as shown in the figure below are not eligible products.

Products marked with are not eligible products.

How to do it. Products that have been confirmed to be subject to this phenomenon can be inspected free of charge, regardless of whether they are within or outside the warranty period specified by the Company. We will inform you of the corresponding arrangements separately.

We apologize for any inconvenience this product may cause!

Canon has always been committed to providing our customers with high-quality, reliable products. We look forward to your understanding and support!

What do you mean by the common problem? 550d is relatively powerful at the entry level,**It's still a bit inflated.,Wait for New Year's Day to start.。

Dust is a problem of changing lenses and maintenance, and if you get into the dust, you can go to the repair point to find someone to get it, in fact, you can pay attention to some Canon trade fairs, which can help you clean up for free.

Take portraits, more money is 50, 2500 or so, less money is 50, **hundred, macro money is more than 100 micro, **tens of thousands, less money is on the header 18-55 plus reverse adapter, this**online to see how others buy.

There's nothing to say about the scenery, Xiaobai, near and far, 17-40, the wide angle is also available. If the money is less, it will be directly 18-200, and the distance and near will be combined, and the non-full focal length will be remembered to multiply.

First of all, I haven't really used Canon's entry-level machine, which is hard to say, but Canon's quality is problematic, this is for sure, and the professional machine is like that, and then there is a common problem with the Canon series, the focus is not good, and the focus is too serious.

Second, as long as you don't disassemble the lens, it generally won't get dust, but you should pay attention to maintenance, you must clean the camera after shooting, don't be afraid of dust, I don't know if the 550d has dust, but in my impression, it seems that Canon has dust, just have that.

The third entry machine To be honest, you can put a good lens on it, and you can't use anything to put it on It's better to practice your hands and then change to a professional machine, forget it, if you insist on matching the head, you can get a portrait on 50 Two thousand five can do it This aperture is big, and it's extremely cool My 7D is this head, cheap and easy to use, 50, as long as six hundred, but the focus is too strong, it's really unbearable, and the scenery is on the line, the sleeve is equivalent to 24-70 of the full-frame machine, and the wide angle is enough As for the macro, don't even think about it, and now 100 micro has become the L head, and it will cost more than 6,000 Drooling and seeing.

1Canon entry-level camera The out-of-focus is common Poor feel Everything else is fine 2 The current camera is in normal use It is not easy to get into the dust and the dust can be cleaned up 3 Considering your budget I feel that you can set the 1855 plus a prime fixed-focus portrait The 18-55 of the set has the function of wide angle and macro It is enough for novices So I recommend that you buy 500d The cost performance is super high About 4300 sets Then the fixed focus of 700d 500d 550d is actually not much different Except for 300w pixels and photography But** It's almost 1000 more expensive entry-level stuff and doesn't get into spending money on lenses and post-production accessories