About the Han Dynasty High School History Questions, High School History Questions, About Ancient Ch

There are two main theories on this issue: manifestation theory and conspiracy theory.

1. Manifestation Theory.

Han in the Asian continent, at that time was one of the powers, in the time of Emperor Wu, the northern expedition to the Xiongnu south to conquer Yunnan, established the status of the Han, the Han Dynasty's science and technology is far more advanced than that of other countries in Europe and Asia, mainly in technology output (such as Li Guangli), the Han does not need other countries' technology, and in the Han period, the grain harvest (in the early Han Dynasty, 1 stone rice = 1 bundle of silk, Jingdi 1 bundle of silk = 500 stone rice), but the Han did not have high-grade ivory. Spices. gems, so in order to meet the needs of the ruling class, it was taken from Europe.

The purchase of other Asian countries is actually an exchange, and the Han envoys buy goods at a higher value than the goods, in order to show that they are big countries, and they are not for economic purposes.

2. Conspiracy theories.

It is believed that Emperor Wu of the Han Dynasty used the economic thought of Sang Hongyang, and used the strategy of drawing wages from the bottom of the kettle when he was abroad, exchanging China's cheap products for foreign valuables, and exchanging the only products that the other party can boast of and can exchange with foreign countries.

Diplomacy. Because when the Han Dynasty was first established, there were still many ethnic minorities who had ambitions for the Han Dynasty, and under the guise of economic **, they sold the indispensable and indispensable things that were missing among those ethnic minorities and only had in the Central Plains, so as to form friendships with other countries.

In China's agrarian civilization, commerce was only a very small aspect of social and economic life, so the subjective desire at that time was not to require the economy as the purpose, of course, the result of this was like claiming to be a big country, showing the demeanor of a great power, but in fact, it was not, and it should be viewed in combination with the reality of the time.

There is basically nothing external, at most it is sometimes intermittent ** behavior with the Xiongnu in the northern steppes and the Western Regions. Even the so-called digging through the Western Regions is more of a cultural and political significance.

Each takes what he needs and communicates with each other for ......

This is the ultimate goal of any economic interaction!

Don't believe in the statements in the book, which is to support a "conclusion", that is, the economy of feudal society is in the service of the emperor. What the hell!

They regard themselves as great powers and exert leniency on their subjects.

Spread the power of the Han Dynasty, and those who offend our Han will be punished even if they are far away.

1.The fifteenth century was marked by the revival of European antiquity, while the twentieth century was the ...... of the revival of Asian antiquityWestern scholars are Chinese, and Confucianism is dumbfounded, and when it comes to its reality, it is mostly consistent with the princes. As a result, the Zhou-Qin school flourished, blowing the ashes of Qin and raising the glory of the motherland.

The revival of Asian antiquity is not the same timeEuropean antiquity in the 15th century clearly points to the European Renaissance in the 15th century, the revival of the humanistic spirit of ancient Greek and Roman classical culture, the review of Asian antiquity in the 20th century, and the glory of the motherland. The material says that the intellectual culture of the West has made those famous Confucian scholars dumbfounded, but the actual examination of it is similar to the ideas of the hundred schools of thought, so the revival of Asian ancient studies.

To think that the Asian Renaissance and the Renaissance are similar is to think that they have similarities, but they do not rise to the level of nature. It is not explicitly stated what the nature of the Renaissance was. If the material says that something like the Renaissance was a political revival of a great power that is contrary to the nature of its ideological emancipation movement, you can say that it is confused.

2.In order to correspond to the material rather than relying on knowledge, the key to historical investigation is the ability to extract information. The material clearly shows that the quality of the people is not good, so even a good political system is useless.

Obviously, the idea that secondary schools should be used for Western learning has failed. It can be seen that it is a reflection after the failure of the Wuxu Reform, which can be related to Liang Qichao's Xinmin Theory or Xinmin Theory (I can't remember clearly...). Yan Fu advocated strengthening the country through the new people.

3.The point is wrong... I feel that the focus in the material should be in the first half:

It is natural for human beings to be divided into natural masters and natural slaves", which can clearly point to the hierarchy, which is consistent with Confucianism's advocacy of maintaining a distinct hierarchy (in addition, Chinese and foreign historical figures commented that Aristotle's thought and Confucius's thought have many things in common).Legalism emphasized the centralization of power and promoted the process of feudalism in China. It's still slavery, which has more in common with Confucianism.

The essence of Legalism's service to the ruler often cannot be the basis for judging the schools of thought in ancient China, for example, Dong Zhongshu's idea of great unification.

The second question, Yan Fu is a person in the same period as Kang Youwei and Liang Qichao, they are all reformists, option A is the New Culture Movement, option B is the Westernists, and option C is the revolutionary, so you can only choose D.

3.Confucianism emphasized hierarchical order, that is, slaves were to serve the nobility and obey the aristocracy.

1."Generally speaking, thirteen (three-tenths) of people are in Yi, and seventeen are in the world; The savings it has accumulated, including 11 and 19 outside" refers to the lending and operation of the Hui merchant bill number in the Ming and Qing dynasties, and ninety percent of the savings were borrowed for reinvestment of the principal, similar to the current bank capital lending, and B's statement is correct.

2.The Song Dynasty directly set up a transfer envoy to be responsible for local finances, which "eliminated the material basis of local separatist forces", and "strengthened local control" was relatively broad, not as accurate as D, and the materials were clearly set up directly by **.

Eleven is inside, nineteen is outside, which means that most of the money is spent outside to expand business capital, so choose B

The second question is mainly to see that the general 'wealth', that is, the tax, the local government should divide the necessary money, and the money will be collected, except for the material basis of the local separatist forces, d is the most accurate.

In fact, the first question focuses on "its savings", that is to say, the following "then eleven inside, nineteen outside" is to explain how the savings of the Hui merchants work, and the internal retention of one-tenth (or eleven) is to vote for nine-tenths externally, so choose B

1.For most Hui merchants, one-tenth of their savings are used at home, and nine-tenths of their savings are used outside. 。

The Northern Song Dynasty set up a transshipment envoy to be responsible for local finance and taxation, and the local finance was collected by the local government, so that the local government lost the economic initiative and no longer had the economic strength to confront it.

Papermaking "Nine Chapters of Arithmetic" Geokinetic Instrument.