How do you think about the problem that your lover has to live with her in laws because of the so ca

I also understand this, because my husband is a very filial child, very good to his parents, so staying at home is also to take good care of them, and at the same time spend more time with his parents, and grandchildren to accompany him, so that parents can share the joy of family, not to others to gnaw on the old or something, to be good to parents is also the responsibility and obligation of our children.

Filial piety is one thing, but how to compensate for advantages is another. It is not recommended for two people to live with their in-laws after they get married, and they usually seem to be harmonious, but once there are some problems, it is not clear how to say it. Besides, even if you live separately, you can often go home to see, as long as you have filial piety.

I think it's only a small reason why he wants to live with his in-laws and wants to be filial, even if he lives together, he still has to be his parents to take care of him, so the main reason is that he is a little dependent on his parents, and he can't do without his parents, in other words, he is not mature enough, a little bit of gnawing at the old, and wants to be taken care of.

If your lover wants to live with your in-laws, then I think first of all he should be a filial person. At this time, it depends on whether he is good to you, if he is good to you, then I don't think there is anything, if your in-laws are a good person to get along with then it is better. But if you don't like it, you can talk to him.

I think it's normal, for a man all over the world, if he really has filial piety, he will definitely choose to live with his parents. I don't know why so many people don't understand, okay, if you don't understand, think about it in the future, your son and daughter-in-law dislike you and don't want to live with you, what will you think in your heart? If you think it's good not to live with your children, then I don't have anything to say.

This is worth encouraging, a person with filial piety knows gratitude, if you repay your in-laws with him, he will see it in his eyes, and he will be better for you when you get along, at this time you will feel the essential changes brought about by his filial piety, and he will also be grateful to you.

Sometimes you should know how to be filial to your lover, but you can't be too unprincipled, you should have principles and bottom lines in everything you do, so I think you won't be biased in doing things, so that you won't be too wronged, so that's good.

My boyfriend also once raised this kind of question, I didn't agree at the time, after all, the lifestyle of young people and the lifestyle of the elderly are very different, if we are just for filial piety, in fact, we can find a place to live near the old man's house, then this can take care of the elderly, and will not affect the lives of both parties, if the boyfriend does not agree with this plan, I think I will consider ending the relationship, because love is the need to honor both parents, But at the same time, you must respect your love.

I think it's not unfilial that juniors don't want to live with the elderly. It's about the need for separate spaces for both sides. After all, there is a generational gap between the old and the young.

Work and rest time, living habits. Eating habits and so on are not the same. So barely living together.

It's also very tiring. Older people like to wake up early every day. Young people like to sleep in the morning.

Older people like to eat a light diet. And young people like to eat big fish and meat. There are a lot of different places.

So you put these two kinds of people together. Definitely uncomfortable on both sides. It's better to separate than both of you are uncomfortable.

If Becky and the elderly don't live together. You can choose between a community or a building. Buy two houses to live in. Once there is a problem, the junior can arrive in time to take care of the elderly. That's fine, there's no need to huddle under one roof all day.

Whether the juniors are filial or not. It's not about living under one roof or not. Many juniors live under the same roof with the elderly.

I didn't see how filial they were. The same old man, serving them all day long. Cook for them, do laundry, take care of the kids.

In the end, I was still not satisfied. I always pick three or four. So.

The elderly themselves should also take the initiative to separate from the younger generations and not be with them. Isn't it nice for the elderly to live independently on their own? If.

I lost my wife. Then find another one. Two elderly people take care of each other together.

It's a good lifestyle, and the diet is the same. So whenever I feel like I can take care of myself as long as I can live on my own. Don't live with juniors.

This is not a question of filial piety or filial piety. An old man who is about 60 years old now. Most of them are only children.

He had a child. After the child gets married. Gave birth to another child.

They are a family of three. To take care of four elderly people. Who do you want to live with?

It's inconvenient to live with anyone. I live with my in-laws. Maybe the daughter-in-law and her in-laws still have conflicts and quarrels.

On the contrary, it was unpleasant. People don't often say that distance produces beauty. So the two generations don't live together.

Occasionally, we get together and it feels fresh. Isn't that a great thing? There is no need.

Don't kidnap younger generations with morality. If you don't live with the elderly, you are unfilial. This is all the concept of when.

How do I feel like this concept in the Qing Dynasty? Now the concept has been completely changed, and there is no such thing as filial piety or non-filial piety. They all live independently.

And the elderly also have pensions. There are also many nursing homes available in the community. can solve the problems of the elderly.

Why not tie young people together?

Whether to live with their in-laws after marriage, I believe that many young people will encounter such a problem when they first get married. In fact, the answer to this question is obvious, it is very simple, wise in-laws and smart young men will choose the solution of liquid Sun Ze: live differently.

And this has little to do with filial piety or not. The first is resolutely not to live together, but to live very closely. Instead of living with my in-laws, I should go out with my husband and rent a small house of 10 square meters.

Mother-in-law and daughter-in-law are not long-term strategies to accommodate anyone, each has its own living habits, and the son (husband) is the most difficult to disagree. I go to my mother-in-law's house once a week, and everything is according to my mother-in-law's habits, so that my mother-in-law can endure herself and be happy. Occasionally, I will send some small gifts and snacks to my in-laws, and when the children are young, they will be sent to their in-laws' house for half a day, so that the elderly are happy and they are content.

After all, there can only be one man and one woman in a family, and there are many contradictions when there are many people, and after living together for a long time, the contradictions will eventually break out. If you don't live together, you don't necessarily mean you're unfilial, but it's the real unfilial piety that the frequent family conflicts and quarrels that occur together are constant. The second is to live separately, and distance produces beauty.

Distance produces beauty, which has little to do with filial piety or not. For families with children, many young people live with their in-laws because they have different views on the matter of educating their children, and the longer they are together, the more conflicts they have, and they may eventually become enemies. And living separately, distance produces beauty, and it will also be better for each other.

Mother-in-law and daughter-in-law live together, and there are two situations that are very likely to occur, one is the mother-in-law and daughter-in-law war, and the other is that one party has to swallow his anger. And both of these are disadvantages and not benefits for the whole family.