Anxious Friends who have knowledge of the Later Han Dynasty books and historical records

Historical books can be said to be very important in the entire history of China, especially the relevant knowledge recorded in them, which is also very important for the study of the situation at that time. So many scholars and history lovers believe that the historical records and Han books, which are both historical books, "Han Shu".

The difference, and what is the good thing about the Book of Han? <>

Compared with the Book of Han, the content recorded in the same period of history is the same, but it is more concise to write, which can save pen and ink and make it more convenient for readers to read. And the same thing, what is recorded in the Book of Han will be more objective, and the position will not be like Sima Qian.

The same adds a lot of personal mastery. In some cases, they are even evaluated according to some of the individual's state of mind, so that the historical record will be more realistic. <>

In addition, there is another big difference between the "Book of Han" and the "Records of the Historians", that is, the "Records of the Historians" tends to biography each character, and then evaluate them, so as to record history from this aspect. However, the characteristic of the Book of Han is that the content of the writing is relatively comprehensive, and a series of characters are often listed in the same chapter, so that the content of each article will look more concise. In addition, the evaluation of historical figures in the Book of Han will also be simpler and politically conscious.

It is also richer than the "Historical Records", and the evaluation of the two "Historical Books" for the same characters is also different. This is mainly because the authors of the two books are different in age and from a different perspective, so this also leads to the fact that the literary quality of the "Historical Records" is higher, while the content of the "Book of Han" is more objective, but it is also relatively boring. <>

To sum up, the main reason why the Book of Han is better than the Records of the Historians in the eyes of some scholars is that the Book of Han is more concise and the political consciousness in the historical records is more complete than that of the Records of the Historians.

Because the "Records of the Historians" and the "Book of Han" are very different in terms of historical views, language styles, or systems. The specific good place is mainly because of 1Sima Qian's "Records of the Historians" can truthfully expose the sins of the emperor and nobles.

The Book of Han is an official document of the edict, and its positioning is to serve the feudal dynasty, so it does not have the strong critical spirit of the "Historical Records". 2.In terms of language use, the "Historical Records" draws heavily on folk sayings, proverbs, and folk songs, which are easy to understand and easy to understand.

Ban Gu, the author of the Book of Han, was a famous Fujia writer in the Eastern Han Dynasty.

The Book of Han is more complete than the Records of the Historians, thus enhancing the historical value of the Book of Han. The first is the ideological comparison, and the feudal orthodoxy of the "Book of Han" is stronger than that of the "Historical Records". The writing of the "Records of the Historians" focuses on "studying the changes of heaven and man, through the past and the present", while Ban Gu's "Book of Han" focuses on "comprehensively acting on them, running through the Five Classics, and communicating up and down".

The different historical perspectives, the stronger language styles, and the different institutional aspects show that Hanshu is better than Shiji. The good thing is that the style of the language, the way of expounding the historical point of view, the record of the completion group and the form of writing, as well as the principles and attitudes of writing.

Even though they are the "Gemini constellations" of the historiography of the two Han Dynasty, they are far inferior to the "Historical Records" when it comes to writing about people's feelings, the words are sincere and beautiful, and the emotions are sincere and moving.

Comparison of the similarities and differences between the "Records of the Historians" and the "Book of Han" I. Comparison of the style and content The "Records of the Historians" is the first general history of the chronicle in China. The Book of Han is the first dynastic history of our country. The Book of Han refers to the province of "Benji" in the "Records of the Historians" as "Ji", the province of "Liechuan" as "Chuan", and the "book" as "Zhi", and the "family" is cancelled and merged into the "Liechuan", which is more neat and unified than that of the "Historical Records".

The most wonderful chapters of the "Historical Records" are the biographies of the characters in the Chu and Han dynasties and the early Western Han Dynasty, while the essence of the "Book of Han" lies in the vivid descriptions of various characters in the prosperous era of the Western Han Dynasty. The outstanding figures of the Qin and Han dynasties written in the "Historical Records" were in the undetermined situation of the world, and a group of reckless heroes emerged at this time, the most notable of which were generals and strategists.

The characters of the prosperous era of the Western Han Dynasty written in the Book of Han are different, they grew up in an environment where the four seas have been determined and the world is unified, among which there are certainly many military generals and strategists, but more are legal scholars and Confucian scholars. Compared with the generals and strategists of the Qin and Han dynasties, although the experience of the law, economics and literature of the prosperous Western Han Dynasty is not legendary, the experiences of many people are dramatic.

The Chronicles has a strong tragic overtone, with a large number of biographies of tragic figures. The number of tragic characters in the "Book of Han" is not as numerous as in the "Historical Records", but the biographies of Li Ling and Su Wu in the "Biography of Li Guangsu Jian" are like many famous articles in the "Historical Records", written heartily and vividly, and the tragic atmosphere is very heavy.

Clause. First, the writing is concise and neat, and the details are rigorous.

Clause. Second, the author often alludes to praise and disapproval in the flat and direct narrative, and he has a fairly accurate grasp of proportion.

Third, the author has put a lot of effort into the selection of materials and is good at tailoring.

Fourth, in terms of structure, the author pays great attention to the ins and outs of historical events.

Clause. Fifth, the author has included a large number of rhetorical essays, which strengthens the literary character, but too many quotations sometimes affect the coherence of the literary tone.

Whether it is the subject matter or the writing technique, historical literature is an important source of prose for later generations.