What kind of idealism does the phrase benevolence, righteousness, propriety, and wisdom not come fr

Benevolence, righteousness, propriety, and wisdom do not come from the outside, but also from the outside" This sentence belongs to idealism.

I am born in the flesh.

Materialists mostly understand the world through sensibility and perception, and only what can be felt by people's eyes, ears, nose, tongue, body, and mind is real.

Idealists mostly believe that the world has a primordial (coordinate origin, initial point...).It is an eternal existence that cannot be perceived, it is a real existence! And everything, including people, has life and death (people die, things decay, weather, etc.).

From this leads to the eternal ultimate (absolute origin, absolute highest point) such as "Tao" and "God".

As for what kind of idealism, I don't know.

1. Subjective idealism.

2. Idealism: Idealism is divided into subjective idealism and objective idealism.

1) Subjective idealism: Subjective idealism believes that the spirit of the individual is the origin of the world and the first product, and everything in the world only exists in the individual's mind, or the product of the individual's soul, which is the second product, 2) Objective idealism believes that the spirit is the origin of the world and the first nature, but this spirit is not the subjective spirit of the individual, but a mysterious and objective spirit that exists in the universe.

3. Materialism:

1) The difference between materialism and idealism is the question of the primacy of existence and thinking. Materialism holds that existence is primary, whereas idealism holds that thinking is primary.

2) Materialism admits the primacy of matter and the secondness of consciousness, and believes that the origin of the world is matter.

4, the source of the original sentence: "Benevolence, righteousness, propriety and wisdom, I am inherent".

5, original text: compassion is shared by everyone; Everyone has a heart of shame; Respectful heart is shared by everyone; Everyone has the heart of right and wrong. compassion, benevolence; The heart of shame is also righteousness; Respectful heart, courtesy; The mind of right and wrong also.

Benevolence, righteousness, propriety and wisdom, not from the outside, I am also inherent, and I am inherent. Therefore, it is said: "If you ask for it, you will get it, and if you give it, you will lose it."

6. Translation: Compassion is something that everyone has; Shame is common to all; Respect, everyone has; Everyone has the heart of right and wrong. Compassion belongs to benevolence; Shame belongs to righteousness; Respect is courtesy; Right and wrong belong to the mind.

This benevolence, righteousness, propriety, and wisdom are not imposed on me by external factors, but are inherent in me, but I don't usually think about it and therefore don't feel it. So, 'Seek and you will gain, and give up and you will lose.'

This sentence comes from a passage in "Mencius: Gongsun Chouxia", the original text is: "Benevolence, righteousness, propriety, and wisdom are not external to me." I'm inherent, Firth. , which means "benevolence, righteousness, courtesy, wisdom, this is not honed from the outside world, but my own world sedan chair bureau itself has, I have never thought of leaving these." ”

Mencius was a famous philosopher during the Warring States period, who emphasized that human nature has a good element, and advocated that people should carry forward their own good nature and improve their moral quality through cultivation and practice.

Benevolence, righteousness, propriety, and wisdom emphasize the importance of people's inner qualities for moral cultivation, and are in line with ideas such as "natural goodness" and "human nature is inherently good". It emphasizes that moral qualities are innate, not acquired through external education, training, or other means. Therefore, the significance of this sentence is to remind people to carry forward their inner good qualities and improve their moral qualities through their own cultivation and practice.

This statement is still relevant in today's society. It reminds people to pay attention to their own hearts, discover their own strengths and strengths, and carry forward the good qualities of self-search and self-cultivation through their own efforts and cultivation. At the same time, this sentence also reminds us that social education should focus on the cultivation and development of people's inner qualities, not just the inculcation of knowledge and skills, so that people can truly understand and appreciate the importance of personal moral quality, and promote social harmony and the development of human civilization.

First of all, we must understand the meaning of this sentence: benevolence, righteousness, propriety, and wisdom do not permeate from the outside, and I already have these qualities.

From this, we can see that everything is only an appearance of us, an expression of our heart.

The most philosophical philosophers ... That's too broad. And everyone will have their own unique opinion on the definition of "the most".

SOCRATES: Know thyself. Plato:

A good start is half the battle. Aristotle: I love my teacher, and I love the truth even more.

There are many famous philosophers, such as Kant, Spinoza, Descartes, Schopenhauer, Nietzsche and so on.

There is a problem with this statement, which can be seen as many or all, so are stones, trees, and stars also our appearances? We are human beings, not things, benevolence, righteousness, propriety, and wisdom are unique qualities of human beings, and what is the relationship with all things?

Seeing this question, I feel inexplicable, none of the four answers have anything to do with the question itself, but there is a concept in it that belongs to the world view, not philosophy, which is the so-called gold, wood, water, fire, and earth, and everything is within these five elements, including people, and all things are our appearances, that is, the nature of human beings is gold, wood, water, fire, and earth, but this is only the worldview of some people, not the essence of the facts, and whether the pluralism of gold, wood, water, fire, and earth is correct remains to be verified.