If all the countries of the world do not think about the military

Where there are people, there is competition.

People have selfish intentions, and you don't want to bully others.

But you can't guarantee that others will do the same, so.

You must not have the heart to harm others, and you must not have the heart to defend others.

It's doomed that your ideas are impossible.

Will Capital Group agree? Impossible.

The presence of troops is a political necessity, and the arms trade is also an important income for a large country, such as the United States.

The struggle for interests in the world determines who has the strongest force and who has the first hegemony (such as the United States).

So, the kind of situation you're talking about, it's almost impossible, unless there are no borders between countries. Just as there are no thieves, no one is interested in pursuing great wealth anymore. Completely tired of killing, giving up the struggle between people, everyone changed to a vegetarian diet, and reduced their desires to a minimum, then the earth became a big temple, and every day in addition to farming and eating, it was to knock wooden fish at home.

Knock, knock, knock.

It's cute :)

Truth be told, I think the same thing as you! It seems that we are all simple human ......

If world peace ......reminds me of Guo Degang's cross talk, MJ's MV ......

There is no harmonious and stable world without a solid national defense, just think of a home, if there is no courtyard wall, just a lonely house, will you feel safe?

The population is growing, but the global resources are insufficient. If humanity does not yet find a way to expand to other planets, relations between countries will become tense in the long run, and armaments will only increase or decrease (the root cause is the competition for the living space of the earth, including resources). Hopefully, I'm worried.

I don't think humans would have such an awareness even if they waited until the day of extinction, after all, humans are also animals and have a competitive relationship.

Everyone is greedy, and in order to make the desires of others not infringe on their own interests in the process of realizing them, it is necessary to develop the military of their own country.

Competition in another situation will develop. Military-to-civilian technology.

Human greed is unlimited, and if you don't think about the military, you are afraid that you will return to a primitive society.

The long-range S-300F (S-300) is a naval version, the Americans call it SA-N-6, also called "Reeve"-M, the medium-range "Shikili" medium-range ship-to-air missile ** system, the Western designation SA-N-7, the short-range artillery integrated close-in defense system "Chestnut" shipborne artillery combined with the air defense system, "Kashtan" is its export type.

Can you imagine a peasant family with a large population, whose crops on their vast land are unobstructed, and who are repeatedly robbed by thieves, but still holding sticks in every corner of their home, ready to meet the robberies of their homes day and night, even though there will no longer be strongmen breaking into their doors, but still refusing to relax because of the memory of robbery in history?

Obviously, the United States only wants to solve its domestic economic problems at present, and does not want to go to war, and it has consumed too much money in Iraq and Afghanistan all the year round, and it is impossible to continue the war, and there are domestic armed forces that can completely cope with Japan, and it will certainly not be like sixty or seventy years ago, and the situation in the countries around China is not very optimistic, and Vietnam has already rented Lan Wan to India, and India's armed forces are so close to contain.

and observe the South China Sea Fleet.

As for what you said, Germany basically won't, because the entire EU basically doesn't want a war, let alone help Japan.

Japan does not have that ability now, and what he does depends on the face of his American master.

No one would be stupid enough to land on Chinese soil. Even the Americans, including the Chinese, have no chance of winning a battle with the Chinese Army in Chinese mainland. The Japanese, too, are making trouble in the disputed sea area and do not even dare to invade China's territorial waters.

This can rest assured that the current China is not the China of more than 70 years ago.

You're really a tendon. Even if the Japanese really want to invade, it must be armed aggression? Is economic and political pressure impossible?

Hehe, this netizen's question is really interesting, as a military fan, I have never paid attention to this issue, but I skimmed it slightly. From the perspective of active military strength, South Korea is superior to Australia in both its navy and air force, but the two countries are about 5,000 kilometers apart and have no aircraft carriers, and only the navy has offensive strength. Most of South Korea's navy is an improved version of the first-line active service of the United States, and in the face of the military threat from North Korea all year round, the quality of the army is significantly better than that of Australia.

This is a personal opinion, please point out any errors. ）

Only, as mentioned above, the two countries are more than 5,000 kilometers apart and there is no direct or indirect conflict of interest. And how can there be a war?!

The cold country, the sixth in the world, the first equipment is made in the United States, and Australia is also prepared by the United States, but South Korea is a little more powerful.

It is difficult to say, mainly depending on the economic strength of the two countries.

The possibility of them fighting is very small, if you don't consider external factors and the battlefield, I am still optimistic about the Netherlands, the South Koreans have more people and more troops, but the equipment is not as good as that of the Netherlands, South Korea is advanced, and the United States is relatively inferior**, while the Netherlands uses the European Union's relatively superior**.

You say, they're so far apart that whoever fights the other loses both.

Where to fight?? Whoever is on their home turf will be invincible.

There is no question of team competition, and no war can be a**.

The following is a comparison of the military strength of the Dutch army and the Indian army, without any explanation, the landlord can draw conclusions by looking at it himself.

The Netherlands has an active force of 57.18 million (all services combined).

The army strength is 270,000.

330 main battle tanks.

More than 400 infantry chariots.

There are more than 600 artillery pieces of various types.

More than 130 anti-aircraft guns.

The Dutch navy has a strength of 1,380,000 men.

Submarines: 4 ships of the "Walrus" class.

Missile destroyers: 2 ships of the "Tromp" class and 2 ships of the "Van Hermske" class.

Frigates: 8 ships of the "Cary Dolman" class and 4 ships of the "Cotton Air" class.

Minesweepers: 17 ships.

Amphibious ships: 1 unit.

The Dutch Air Force has 11.98 million troops.

Attack fighters: 171 F-16A B.

Maritime reconnaissance aircraft: 2 F-27 aircraft.

Transport aircraft: 11 DC-10-30 and so on.

Trainer aircraft: 10 pc-7 types.

: 73 in total, of which 12 are armed***.

Surface-to-air missiles: 48 "Hawk", 5 "Patriot", 100 "Stinger".

Anti-aircraft guns: 40 mm 100 guns.

Air-to-air missiles: several "Sidewinders".

There are no Strategic Missile Forces.

India's active military strength is 114,500.

The strength of the army is 980,000.

3414 main battle tanks.

1,300 infantry chariots.

More than 8,000 artillery pieces of various types.

More than 2,400 anti-aircraft guns.

More than 1,800 surface-to-air missiles.

The navy has 10,000 troops.

It is equipped with 151 ships of various types.

Among them, 1 aircraft carrier.

19 submarines.

6 destroyers.

18 frigates.

49 ships patrolled with the coast.

20 minesweepers.

10 amphibious landing ships.

28 support ships of various kinds.

The strength of the Air Force is 140,000.

It is equipped with 772 combat aircraft and 170 aircraft (including 32 armed aircraft).

There are 17 attack fighter squadrons (equipped with 53 MiG-23bn, 88 "Jaguar" MiG-21MF combat aircraft), 20 fighter squadrons (equipped with 66 MiG-21FL, 169 MiG-21BIS, 26 MiG-23MF, 64 MiG "Mirage" 2000H TH and 8 Su-30MKI combat aircraft), 3 attack squadrons (equipped with 32 Mi-24***), 2 reconnaissance aircraft squadrons (equipped with 8 aircraft" Zpera MiG-25 and 2 MiG-25U reconnaissance aircraft), 12 squadrons of transport aircraft (equipped with 105 installed DO 228, 28 BAE 748, 25 Il-76 transport aircraft), 11 transport squadrons (equipped with 73 Mi-8, 36 Mi-17, 10 Mi-26).

Strategic Missile Forces: Equipped with the "Agni family" missiles from Agni-1 - Agni-4 (range 8000 km, can hit Beijing, Shanghai).

War is not a formula, and the outcome is not certain. Even if the population, the number of equipment and the level of combat effectiveness are very strong, they do not necessarily win the war, and the war is a comparison of comprehensive national strength. Just like Israel in the Middle East war, although it is at a disadvantage, it can still win the war.

But if you really want to compare the equipment and the size of the army, India must be strong. Not much to say, India has nuclear **, it has ballistic missiles, it has a huge air force, among which there is a Su-30MKK, and there is a fleet of tankers. The army has a huge T-90 tank complex.

The Navy, with three aircraft carriers, is second only to the United States in power in the Indian Ocean.

Although the quality of equipment and personnel in the Netherlands is very high, the quantity cannot be compared with India...

The problem is that the Netherlands is NATO, and with the support of the United States behind it, who will the Netherlands be afraid of?

In addition, Europe has a dirty secret, that is, in addition to Britain and France, which have their own nuclear forces, there are four countries with nuclear capabilities: Germany, the Netherlands, Italy, and Belgium. There are nuclear ** stored at the air bases of these four countries, and the aircraft of each country have the ability to deliver these nuclear **. About 200 B61 thermonuclear gravity bombs are scattered and stored in the four countries.

Under the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO) agreement signed during the Cold War, these nuclear weapons are technically owned by the United States, but in the event of war, they can be transferred to the control of the air force of the host country. At that time, the Netherlands will have the strength to contend with it.

But if it's in your ideal state, I think India is stronger.

If you look at the military comparison, India is stronger than the Netherlands, and the military-industrial system and comprehensive strength of India are stronger than the Netherlands.

I'm curious why the landlord let the Netherlands pass by with India.。。。

The Netherlands' national defense is completely self-defensive, and India, with Pakistan and China as imaginary enemies, cannot reach the Netherlands at all, and the two sides cannot fight at all. Moreover, if India dares to attack the Netherlands, NATO will not be able to sit idly by.

Can't beat it! The third brother is like coming to do the backstage!

At most there is a Zorro in the Netherlands

Your question can only be established with assumptions, and in the real world, these two countries will basically never fight each other, and there is no intersection at all.

From my personal point of view, North Korea will win, and the hardships of their people are well known. But what else is so famous? Military**Ah!! The DPRK's military development is very impressive.

In contrast, the Netherlands was a very stable country, and there was no war to prepare for. Although it is believed that they can also have very superior equipment, but fighting a war requires state, a country that is preparing for war and a country that is stable and peaceful, it is already obvious who wins and who loses.