Canon A650 Sony H9 How to choose???

Updated on number 2024-04-07
21 answers
  1. Anonymous users2024-02-07

    I recommend you to choose the A650, first of all, the 650 uses 1 CCD, I believe you also know how important the CCD is for the imaging of the camera. H9The infrared function is not of much use, for example, many mobile phones above the mid-to-high-end are equipped with infrared function, if you have such a mobile phone, have you used his infrared function? For example, the current Bluetooth, how much chance do you have of using it.

    This infrared is to provide some convenience for shooting and printing outside** and auxiliary focusing, but the camera has a data cable, and no one will print all day**.

    650 is 6 times the light change, H9 is 15 times, to be honest, you don't take pictures to shoot so far, to shoot some things you like, you must be able to see it clearly. So the magnification of the optical zoom is not so important.

    Canon imaging is softer, the restoration is more realistic, Canon as the leader of the camera industry, imaging naturally has its own uniqueness. Sony's imaging characteristics are relatively gorgeous, that is, the colors are more vivid, especially red and green, which can be highlighted by Sony in the design, so that the ** feeling is very good-looking, very visually impactful.

    If you like to shoot landscapes, then choose the H9, if you have a wide range of hobbies, or choose Canon, Canon imaging is indeed better overall than Sony. Restore the real and natural.

    If you add a little more to this price point, it is recommended that you choose Canon G9, G series as Canon's consumer-grade flagship model, imaging, performance, and quality are better than 650. There are comparative reviews of the G9 and 650 available online, so you can find them and check them out.

  2. Anonymous users2024-02-06

    Actually, this camera; With different performance and uses, Canon A650IS can be said to be the camera below 3000 thousand yuan, the imaging effect is the most outstanding, there is no camera that can surpass it, if you haven't actually shot with A650IS**, you can want to see the original Canon A650is shooting from the Internet**, it is indeed very ideal. It's hard to see that it was taken by this little DC. If you have high standards for imaging, the Canon A650is should not disappoint you.

    The overall performance of the Sony H9 is also very outstanding, the shape design is powerful, at a glance I thought it was a professional camera, and I thought it was a professional camera at a glance, and I thought it was very enjoyable to shoot with a 15x wide zoom lens. The 3-inch flippable screen looks very comfortable, but to tell the truth, I think the imaging is really ordinary, and the color restoration is OK, very gorgeous, the video function is also good, and it can also be zoomed, and it also has a remote control. In short, if the requirements for picture quality are not very high.

    In addition, it is very good.

    Let's talk about infrared photography, but I don't think this function has much effect, first of all, the image is only almost monochrome with infrared, if the shooting distance is up to two meters in a completely dark environment, because the infrared emission power of the camera is only this distance. And it's grainy.

  3. Anonymous users2024-02-05

    The positioning of the two machines themselves is not the same, and the H9 is a telephoto (super telephoto).And the A650IS is just a 6x optical zoom.

    Comparatively speaking, the A650is is better. Unless you have higher requirements for optical zoom. As far as the A650IS's 6x optical zoom is concerned, it is basically enough for a student. The A650is has good imaging.

    Infrared is a focus assist feature from Sony that can assist focusing in low-light environments.

  4. Anonymous users2024-02-04

    Any camera has characteristics, A650 claims to have everything you need, the only regret is that there is no wide angle, and the appearance is really average. H9's telephoto is really scary enough,Some people on the Internet have compared H9 with Canon S5,S5 is slightly better。 The comprehensive performance of the A650 is higher than that of the S5, so the A650 is recommended

    If you think that the A650 telephoto is not enough, then the S5 is recommended

  5. Anonymous users2024-02-03

    I've been keeping an eye on it, but in the end, both in terms of performance and **, the targets are only locked on, so I recommend the Canon A650is or the Nikon P5100. When you have time, you'll be ready to come back in one piece! When the time comes, it depends on the merchant's after-sales service and the camera to send me a lot of things!

    Hehe. **:2300-2600;Function, let's not talk about it, the few upstairs are pretty much the same.

  6. Anonymous users2024-02-02

    Personally, I think that the Canon A650 is 12 million pixels, and the effect should be one word: "good"! I'm using this brand too, but mine isn't that good! Hehe. It works! The A650 is really good! It is recommended to buy!

  7. Anonymous users2024-02-01

    The H9 looks more professional, but it's not quite effective. You can consider the Fujifilm S9600, which is a bit stronger than the Canon A650.

  8. Anonymous users2024-01-31

    In terms of imaging quality and color reproduction, and clarity, A650 is the best.

    The main advantage of Sony's H series is the telephoto lens, as well as the workmanship materials.

  9. Anonymous users2024-01-30

    The above models are not of the same type; The Canon A650 and Nikon P5100 are high-image, high-CCD consumer high-end models, while the other ones are telephoto series machines.

    If you pursue image quality and manual function,Of course, Canon A650IS is better than NikonP5100,In the evaluation, the parameters are better than NikonP5100,Fujifilm S8000FD is better than the previous ones in several parameter evaluations in the telephoto category,Not Sony's comprehensive performance is also good,You can shoot video and optical zoom,If you don't emphasize the image effect, you can also choose。

  10. Anonymous users2024-01-29

    Personally, I think the Nikon P5100 is better. The size is small, there are many manual functions, and the picture quality is not bad.

  11. Anonymous users2024-01-28

    Two machines with different positioning,CCD is as important as the human heart,The larger the pixel, the higher the hap,A650CCD is 1,That is, 1 is larger than H7,So the pixel is higher,The batteryA650 is more durable,Because it depends on what kind of rechargeable battery the landlord buys,Personally, I recommend using 2500 mAh*4,It's quite scary! It's estimated that you can shoot soft hands.,A650 shape.。。 How to say it,It's more suitable for families.,Both are fully manual functions in terms of operation.,There are automatic modes inside.,So you can operate at will.,If you still have questions, indicate the number.。

  12. Anonymous users2024-01-27

    H7 advantages: large zoom, full manual operation Disadvantages: The display screen has a low pixel, the display is not delicate enough, and it is not easy to get started when the light is dark - if you don't operate manually, the noise multi-scene mode is not rich enough - for people who are not good at manual work, the parameters are not good and the fixed point metering can not be moved - if the subject you want to take pictures is not in **, and you need to carry out spot metering, the operation is difficult and the manual function is not strong enough - although it is fully manual, But the manual operation function is not strong enough, the manual is too simple - the manual only briefly introduces the role of each function key, the LCD display, and the lack of necessary guidance for players who are just getting started Summary:

    The camera is slow to get started, it is not easy to shoot well, and it requires special learning, A650 advantages: rotating LCD is very suitable for framing from all angles, and it is a must-have for gamers. The button knob operation is very comfortable, it can be operated with one hand, the battery life is long, the weight of the whole machine is calm, the volume is not very large, it can be stuffed into a pocket, the appearance of black and white feels very good, it does not fall into the cliché of pure black and pure white, and it has the style of the master of the previous work, and in fact, 650 is also the flagship of the home machine.

    Disadvantages: The engineering plastic shell feels easy to fade from hand sweat, and the seams are a bit big. The screen pixel is a little low, it feels a little grainy, and the PP shot is best checked by the computer.

    Summary: Overall, A650 is still a camera worth playing, manual functions can be enriched by CHDK software, and the playability is stronger A650 is easy to operate I personally think that the H7 has good performance, but it is not easy to learn.

  13. Anonymous users2024-01-26

    If you pay attention to the appearance, sony performance can be canon

    It depends on what you focus on, and the cost performance is also canon

    CCD is an important element for imaging, if you don't have high requirements for photos, both are enough for home use.

  14. Anonymous users2024-01-25

    Don't ask, 650 is one of the best in the card machine, if you want**beautiful, take it, if you only want the camera to be beautiful, and the requirements for the shooting** are not high, ugly is acceptable, then take Sony, I also support you! It can be said that the performance of the 650 is not comparable to that of the Sony T machine! Neither is a notch!

  15. Anonymous users2024-01-24

    This is a question that needs not be asked.

    Your friend is very, very ignorant of cameras.

    A650 can kill everything in seconds, and the card machine is not much worse than the quasi-professional camera G9, but the T900 is just good-looking.

    The performance can't even match the low end of the Canon.

    How you choose depends on whether you focus on appearance or function.

  16. Anonymous users2024-01-23

    Canon A650 is the most high-end model in the Canon A series, and the performance is only a little worse than the Canon high-end G series models (not counting the SLR), and the A650 is invincible in consumer machines below 3000 yuan, not to mention Sony's T900.

  17. Anonymous users2024-01-22

    A650is has nothing to say, it's very cost-effective, the current A series is not as good as the previous A series, this is a fact, now the A series does not come with manual,

  18. Anonymous users2024-01-21

    Agree that the upstairs Sony T series sells a sleek look Canon A series is a quasi-professional camera with performance that Sony T can't match.

  19. Anonymous users2024-01-20

    Nowadays, many people take a bad card machine and say to the person holding the SLR, "My machine is much more advanced than yours".

    Then I...

  20. Anonymous users2024-01-19

    The G7 is good, but the H9 is not bad either! Overall, H9 is significantly better!

  21. Anonymous users2024-01-18

    Basically, if you don't think about the price, you can exclude 960.

    For 860 and h9 you can look at it like this:

    Advantages of H9.

    1. Full manual function.

    2. Large zoom.

    Advantages of the 860.

    1. Small size.

    2,28mm wide angle.

    So the choice is simple, whether you want a powerful machine or a small machine. If you want both, then choose Canon's G9

Related questions
6 answers2024-04-07

As an off-road vehicle (ORV), Haval H9 has become a new choice for more and more people who covet the Prado brand and performance, but are burdened by the best. As the heart of the car, the Haval H9 is available in both petrol and diesel versions, all equipped with an inline four-cylinder turbocharged engine mated to an 8-speed integrated gearbox, with a maximum horsepower of 252 hp for petrol and a slightly lower 190 hp for diesel, but converted to 420 Nm of torque diesel. The power of the gasoline version is 185 kilowatts, and the diesel version is 140 kilowatts.

31 answers2024-04-07

I haven't driven the H9, but my friend has one, I asked him about the appearance is more atmospheric, domineering, the space is also very large, the power is good, the interior is quite a lot of soft leather materials, it is very comfortable to touch, it is relatively good, not a very good road, the feedback of the chassis is very clear, the control is a little empty, and the steering wheel is not heavy. <>

19 answers2024-04-07

If you don't take into account **, it is naturally 970 best. >>>More

12 answers2024-04-07

<> lumbar support adjustment Seat cushion angle adjustment Seat front and rear adjustment Seat height adjustment Backrest tilt adjustment prompt Some functions are only available for the driver's seat. If your vehicle is equipped with seat ventilation and massage functions, the lumbar support adjustment button will be removed. The seat lumbar support can be adjusted through the multi-display [Vehicle Settings] > [Comfort Settings].

17 answers2024-04-07

There are five seats and seven seats, similar to Chang'an's CS95, these two cars are the same size, the space is very large, it's just that the problem of fuel consumption is different, I suggest you, or the car to understand more, I bought the Haval replaced Chang'an, and now I feel okay, at that time, I just heard that Chang'an's fuel consumption is low to Loudi Runjin to try, and now I want to change to a new Chang'an, haha.