Everyone knows that the battery life of new energy vehicles is still very important, and I want to a

This is true, there are not too many charging piles now, so the battery life of new energy vehicles is indeed very important. I just bought the Xpeng P7, and it is also a 706km NEDC comprehensive range model, which is also the farthest running in the current new energy production car, in order to reduce the trouble of charging as much as possible. I also asked a friend who drove the G3, his car has been running for almost a year, and the battery has basically not decayed, so the battery life is still very powerful.

Now the endurance of new energy vehicles is a matter of great concern to people, China's new energy vehicles started in recent years, so the endurance is still relatively low, probably about 500 kilometers, some boasting that thousands of kilometers of companies, are currently closed, because unreliable.

Under normal circumstances, 500 kilometers is enough, as long as there are charging piles that can replenish the power in time, this problem is not a problem.

Hello, Xpeng P7 has launched a total of eight models with a cruising range of 552 kilometers, 568 kilometers, 656 kilometers and 706 kilometers respectively, and the price range after subsidies is 10,000 yuan to 10,000 yuan. According to the official information, the new Xpeng P7 will be available with two capacity battery packs, kWh and kWh. The two battery packs correspond to DC fast charging modes ranging from 30% to 80% range, with a time of 28 minutes and 31 minutes, respectively, and slow charging modes with hours and hours, respectively.

The battery of the new energy vehicle can be said to be relatively good, the quality is very high, and its endurance is also very long.

If I run long distances, I'm worried about battery life.

As the power heart of the new energy branch key source car, the battery life problem has been a criticism of the new energy vehicle, and the most common questions we hear when buying new energy vehicles are nothing more than the following aspects: First, once the battery of the electric vehicle is scrapped, it needs to be repurchased, which is basically equivalent to the value of buying a new car; Second, the mileage of the battery is not enough, once in remote areas or on high speeds, it is difficult to find a charging pile in time for battery life; The third is that the battery charging is relatively slow, which is not as fast as the refueling of fuel vehicles, which will delay more time.

According to the experience of the vast majority of users, we are not actually thinking about the high mileage, because compared with the fuel tank of the fuel car, it is only 50 liters to 80 liters of all the fuel capacity, it is also difficult to achieve a range of 1,000 kilometers, and when running to about 400 kilometers, you can reserve a distance of about 100 kilometers to find a charging pile, which is already a very good experience. If the cruising range of new energy vehicles is increased to 1,000 kilometers, not to mention the driving distance, how many customers really need such a high mileage demand, only in the case of urban exercise, for most office workers, this is indeed not an important factor worth considering.

If it is for drivers who have independent charging piles or are close to independent charging piles, the amount of cruising range is indeed not in the scope of consideration, and the real consideration of this problem is the driver who is not convenient for timely charging.

In addition, when the high mileage can be realized, the accompanying battery life false standard also exists, so that it is impossible to judge the time of the next charge according to the accurate remaining mileage, if this problem cannot be solved, then whether the battery life is 1,000 kilometers or 500 kilometers, then once the charging time is missed, especially for the riders who often have business trips, it will be a very troublesome thing.

Therefore, we also hope that our technical research and development personnel can better do a good job in this aspect of technical research, which can not only become a good selling point, but also save unnecessary trouble for the majority of car lovers, so as to make their own vehicles get better sales performance.

If it's a short commute, it's no problem, and if I can improve the range, I can eliminate such an anxiety.

Endurance is a pain point for new energy vehicle users. The lower battery life leads to car anxiety while using it. The battery life of electric vehicles is short, and it will also cause charging anxiety in the case of insufficient charging piles, which has always been a pain point for new energy.

It's cold, and I don't dare to turn on the heater to save electricity. Covering the back seat with a blanket to keep passengers out of the cold, and not daring to turn on the cold air when it is hot, has also become a pain point for many novice energy car owners. Nowadays, the rapid popularization of new energy, according to statistics, the number of new energy vehicles in China has reached nearly 10 million.

It can be said that buying new energy vehicles has become an unavoidable problem for ordinary people when buying a car.

At present, most of the mainstream electric vehicle models on the market have a range of more than 500km. Basically, there are many styles, and there are also a variety of models to choose from from 300km to 450km. Different groups of people have more choices, should the use of electric vehicles consider the range?

First of all, according to the full fuel of fuel vehicles, the range of 500km electric vehicles is the same as that of conventional fuel vehicles. Energy vehicles, regardless of whether the range is considered or not, require face-to-face analysis by multiple parties.

First of all, the number of charging stations is analyzed, the number of new energy vehicle charging stations is millions, according to the number of charging stations and the number of vehicles, the station ratio reaches: 1, according to this, the number of charging stations charging piles is 2.22 million, and the proportion of public charging points is compared with the above. Taking high-speed vehicles as an example, many new energy vehicles are trapped at high speeds, and even queues.

Secondly, from another point of view, if the vehicle is only used for daily commuting, there is no need to refer to the vehicle's range, after all, it is convenient to charge in urban areas, such as charging when commuting, you don't have to worry about any anxiety caused by reduced battery life.

On the other hand, most retail and office buildings now have charging stations, so you won't have too many problems with using your car. Although it is necessary to pay attention to the continuation of the lead aviation when buying an electric car now, I think it is still necessary. Finally, vehicle range is still a key indicator of new energy vehicles.

Of course, this is not the main condition for buying new energy vehicles, we still have to pay attention to the safety of the vehicle and our own car use scenarios, which is good that we can use it more easily when buying new energy vehicles.

At present, one of the biggest technical obstacles to new energy vehicles is the problem of battery mileage. This is also the biggest problem that restricts most car companies from developing new energy vehicles. A charging problem is a headache for everyone!

A battery with serious attenuation is even more of a headache! But what is more troublesome is that the spontaneous combustion of the battery will harm everyone's life safety! Therefore, a new new energy vehicle should be made to solve these problems.

Gotta flowers! The greater the difficulty, the more it costs. The battery of new energy can't keep up with it in three or two years, and the car is gone?

Not cost-effective, buy batteries? It is equivalent to buying half a new car, is the cost of the battery so high? I'm still going to kill you!

In my eyes, it is not a means of transportation, but a means of charging through transportation. It is impossible for the car to go around the city every day, occasionally run a high-speed, go to the countryside, and it will be embarrassing if there is no electricity. Charging stations are not as convenient as gas stations.

On the surface, new energy vehicles are cheaper than gasoline vehicles, and if the cost of replacing batteries is included, they are not cheaper than cars.

Ask about charging: where does the electricity come from? 70% of China's current power generation is still coal-fired power generation, does coal-fired power generation have no pollution to the atmosphere?

The so-called new energy vehicles are nothing more than passing on the source of pollution, and ** marrying the power plant). It can travel 500km under any working conditions (whether it is winter, summer, whether it is air conditioned or not, whether it is urban or highway, no matter how many people sit in the car, the battery is less than 5 years), and there are more charging or battery swapping stations, and the battery can be replaced in a few minutes, which will be the time when electric vehicles are really popular.

Two more years! The streets are full of waste batteries and end-of-life cars. New energy vehicles.

Purely a pretense. It's just a subsidy to defraud with new energy. The strength of the car range is enough in two levels: 300 kilometers for small cars in the city, 450 for medium and large cars, and one level for a tank of oil The main problem is that charging piles should be popularized Without charging piles, 800 kilometers will not work.

Countries around the world are developing new energy vehicles, many of which are ahead of us, but so far there is no comprehensive performance of a new energy vehicle that can replace fuel vehicles, and fuel vehicles can not be replaced for a long period of time.

The quality of new energy vehicles is very good and it is not easy to break. The battery can last hundreds of kilometers.

The quality of new energy vehicles and traditional cars is about the same, and the battery life of different cars can achieve different endurance, and now it is generally about 100km-1000km.

The quality is still very good, such as Tesla. The general battery can drive more than 500 kilometers on a single charge.

The quality is still very good, and the general battery can be maintained at about 200 300 kilometers, and it can also go a long distance.

In addition to Tesla, the quality of other new energy vehicles is still okay, if the battery is fully charged, it can run 300 500 kilometers.

The quality is still okay. It depends on the quality of the car, because some cars have a minimum of 100 and a maximum of 700.

<> "New Energy Vehicle Endurance Competition."

New energy vehicle range competition: Tesla, Weilai, Xiaopeng, ideal.

With the popularization of new energy vehicles, mileage has become the focus of attention. In order to meet the needs of consumers, different new energy vehicle brands are constantly launching new models and constantly refueling in terms of battery life.

Among the many new energy vehicle brands, Tesla, NIO, Xpeng Motors, and Li Auto have attracted much attention. Let's take a look at the competition between these brands in terms of battery life.

Tesla. As a leading enterprise in the field of new energy vehicles, Tesla is naturally indispensable in terms of battery life. Tesla's Model S Long Range has a NEDC range of 605 km, the Model X Long Range has a NEDC range of 542 km, and the Model 3 Long Range has a NEDC range of 668 km.

Tesla's leading position in terms of range has been recognized by the majority of consumers.

NIO. As a local new energy vehicle brand in China, NIO has been constantly catching up with Tesla. NIO's current ES6 model has a NEDC range of 510 km, and the ES8 model has a NEDC range of 580 km.

Although it is not yet able to reach Tesla's range, NIO's continuous innovation in battery technology has made consumers have higher expectations for it.

Xpeng. As a new new energy vehicle brand, Xpeng Motors is not as famous as Tesla and NIO, but it has a good performance in terms of battery life. At present, Xpeng Motors has a NEDC range of 520 km for the G3 model and 600 km for the P7 model.

Although Xpeng Motors has a relatively small market share, its performance in terms of range has made people look forward to its development.

Ideal. Li Auto is an innovative new energy vehicle company, and the ONE model launched also has a good performance in terms of range. At present, the NEDC range of the ONE model is 500 kilometers, making it the one with the highest cruising range in the same class.

While emphasizing the vehicle's performance, Li Auto also focuses on promoting the development of new energy, and its leapfrog progress in battery life has made people full of expectations for it.

On the whole, there is little difference in the performance of different new energy vehicle brands in terms of range, and they are constantly striving towards a higher range goal. When consumers buy new energy vehicles, they not only need to pay attention to the mileage, but also need to consider all aspects of their own needs and choose a model that suits them.

This year, Xpeng Motors is progressing well, with a new Xpeng P5 on the market, and the 100th new car officially rolled off the assembly line not long ago. In addition, Xpeng's first model, the Xpeng G3, also ushered in a mid-term facelift and was named the Xpeng G3i.

Strictly speaking, the Xpeng G3i is a product that is converted from oil to electricity, and its foundation comes from a popular Japanese small SUV. Of course, as the brand's first model, it is understandable to borrow and adopt the oil-to-electric platform.

As a mid-term facelift model, the Xpeng G3i adopts a new family front face design, which is similar to the Xiao Peng P7, and the actual effect is quite good. Aside from the new front design, the rest of the styling has not changed much.

In addition, the Xpeng G3i still does not come with rear wipers, which is said to be due to the shape of the tail. However, the absence of rear wipers will undoubtedly affect the safety of driving in rainy days, and car owners also report that the sight of the rear windshield in rainy days is extremely poor. I hope that Xpeng will improve as soon as possible.

Safety is more important than styling.

The wheelbase of Xiaohan Peng G3i is 2625mm, the length of the car is near, according to the standard of trams, the wheelbase is shorter and brighter, which is also limited by the original fuel vehicle platform. The actual rear empty space is level enough. In addition, the backrest of the rear seats is somewhat straight, which affects comfort.

In terms of electricity, the Xpeng G3i offers two NEDC ranges, 460km and 520km, both of which are front-mounted single motors with a motor power of 145kW. The lowest configuration model is equipped with lithium iron phosphate battery, and other models are ternary lithium batteries.

The two endurance versions meet the daily commuting problems in the city, but the problem is not big. If you have long-distance traffic, it's something to consider, especially in the case of high speed and low temperatures in winter. Even the 520km version has to be charged when it travels up to 300km.

In addition, the rear suspension of the Xpeng G3i is a torsion beam, which is not independent. The driving experience is average, the rear suspension bounces a lot, and it lacks some sense of luxury. Some netizens may say that this is nitpicking, but you must know that the guide price of Xpeng G3i is 10,000 yuan, which is not low.

Most tankers in this price range offer excellent multi-link independent rear suspension.

So this is also a problem for many electric vehicles: a lot of cost is spent on the battery pack, and the cost of the battery pack remains high, resulting in lower costs for suspension, steering, training, etc. , making the driving experience of many electric vehicles very poor. In the end, car companies can only desperately promote the so-called "intelligence".

Back to the Xpeng G3i, as an all-electric small SUV, the Xpeng G3i's ** is still a bit wide of curved land, and the configuration is also insufficient. For example, the low-profile version with two endurance even has only four airbags and no front radar. At the current guide price of 10,000 yuan after the subsidy, it is more reasonable to add 20,000 yuan.

Millions of car purchase subsidies.