-
If it is legal, there is no need to sue, but the punishment procedure is flawed, and even if the court makes a fair judgment, it will only require it to change the punishment procedure or make a new punishment. According to the relevant laws of our country, minors are not allowed to drive motor vehicles on the road. Even adults are required to have a driver's license, and motorcycles also require a driver's license.
You violated the law first, but there is a problem with the procedure of suing the traffic police, I don't think it's necessary, if he beats and abuses you in the process of punishment, causing you a certain amount of personal injury or mental damage, you can ask for some compensation. If not, pay a fine and get the car back.
Look at this article: Article 13 Persons applying for a motor vehicle driver's license shall meet the following requirements:
1) Age Requirements:
1. Those who apply for small cars, small automatic cars, and mopeds shall be over 18 years old and under 70 years old;
2. Those who apply for low-speed trucks, three-wheeled vehicles, ordinary three-wheeled motorcycles, ordinary two-wheeled motorcycles or wheeled self-propelled mechanical vehicles shall be over 18 years old and under 60 years old;
-
If you are driving without a license, the traffic police have the right to detain the car.
In this case, the core issue is that the boundary between minors is not clear in this issue, and whether they have the capacity for civil conduct. However, on the whole, the behavior of the traffic police to detain the car should be flawed in the procedure.
As for the winning rate, there is almost none, and the traffic police have the right to detain the car in this case.
-
If you are not qualified to drive, you can impound the car.
-
If you are not qualified to drive, you can impound the car. If the traffic police did not do a good job of dealing with the aftermath as you said, you can ask the relevant departments for an explanation.
-
A car accident within an enterprise is not a traffic accident, but a safety liability accident.
If the deceased is an employee of the enterprise, it is a work-related injury in accordance with the provisions of the Regulations on Work-related Injury Insurance, and he is entitled to work-related injury insurance benefits.
If they are not employees of the enterprise, compensation shall be made in accordance with the provisions of the Interpretation of the Supreme People's Court on Several Issues Concerning the Application of Law in the Trial of Personal Injury Compensation Cases.
-
According to traffic accidents, refer to the compensation for death caused by accidents.
-
Article 83 of the Tort Liability Law Where an animal causes damage to others due to the fault of a third party, the infringed party may request compensation from the animal keeper or manager, and may also request compensation from the third party. After the animal keeper or manager makes compensation, he or she has the right to recover compensation from a third party.
True or False: False.
Article 28 of the Tort Liability Law If the damage is caused by a third party, the third party shall bear tort liability.
Reason: The constitutive elements of a general tort include four aspects: the existence of the harmful act, the existence of the fact of harm, the causal relationship between the harmful act and the fact of the damage, and the subjective fault of the perpetrator.
The assumption of tort liability due to damage caused by a third party does not require the third party to be subjectively at fault, and is a no-fault liability, so it does not need to meet the constitutive elements of tort liability.
Multiple choice questions: ABCD
Article 180 of the General Provisions of the Civil Law: Where civil obligations cannot be performed due to force majeure, civil liability shall not be borne. Where the law provides otherwise, follow those provisions.
Force majeure refers to objective circumstances that cannot be foreseen, avoided, and overcome.
Reason: Generally speaking, force majeure mainly includes: natural disasters, ** behaviors, and social events.
You don't want to reconcile, so you can't reconcile. If he is subject to criminal proceedings in accordance with the normal procedure, you can file an attached civil complaint for compensation at the same time as the criminal prosecution is filed by the prosecutor's office. >>>More
According to your account, the transcript he made in the traffic police is suspicious and completely illogical. If he sees your relative fall to the ground without any relief measures, and finally your relative is hit and killed, it is obvious that he is also liable for failing to fulfill his duty to help.
It's a work-related injury! Your wife's unit is evading responsibility. The employer may be required to bear the liability for work-related injury compensation through labor arbitration on the grounds of work-related injury. If the arbitration result is not satisfactory, you can also file a lawsuit in court. There is a lot of hope for winning. >>>More
I think you need to be cautious about this matter, you said that you found that you had a crush on her after seeing her again, at least it means that you didn't have much feelings for her when you met her in junior high school, so you should think carefully about why you have a crush on her now, just because she grew up beautiful, or something else. >>>More
1. Generally, the public security organs are responsible for collecting evidence, and the victim or ** person, as well as the defender of the criminal suspect, also have the right to collect evidence. >>>More