How not to be in general with others What does it mean not to be in general with others?

Don't try to change other people's minds, the more purposeful it is, the more likely the other party is to rebel, and communicating with friends in life may not be as you wish. As for you being so angry, it is understandable, because you feel that you are right and they are wrong in terms of reasoning, but you are stubborn and do not accept the truth, and even deny you and deny the truth. In fact, in this society, everyone walks on the street, but it is true that not everyone can grasp the truth and recognize right and wrong like you.

Don't dwell on wanting to change other people's behaviors and thoughts that might be better, and you'll be unhappy, then you'll be unhappy, but don't be too long. Oh and, don't deny yourself, trust yourself.

Laugh it off! But that's easier said than done! People often have two sides, in real life, for those who are boastful, aggressive, don't understand anything and brag nonsense, they generally don't argue with him and avoid it, but on the Internet, across the screen, I see some people whose IQ makes people anxious, and they are all sold by others and help them count the money, they always feel like they are in the throat, and they can't help but say a few words to him!

In particular, some people have impure purposes and deliberately mislead others to achieve their ulterior purposes, and I want to say a few words about him! Everyone is talking about being open-minded and indifferent to everything, but there are not many people who can really do it, so you can only try your best, don't make yourself angry because of brain-dead remarks, that is to punish yourself for other people's mistakes!

The world slanders me, despises me, deceives me, insults me, laughs at me, despises me, hates me, deceives me, how to deal with it? Just endure him, let him, let him, avoid him, bear with him, respect him, ignore him, stay for a few more years, and look at him. "This way of dealing with the world, neither fighting nor fighting, but not fighting or angry, is walking its own way, believing that he can have the last laugh.

The root of the problem is not what others think, but that you have no confidence in yourself, afraid of being looked down upon by others, afraid of gossip by others, afraid of being said that you are inferior, in fact, if you think about it carefully, do you care what a stranger does? Then you are also a stranger in the eyes of others, if it is a relative, a friend or something, I think as long as you work your own, no one will look down on you, there is really no need to be with their general knowledge, people live for themselves, live their own lives, care too much about others will be very tired, it is not necessary, it is really unnecessary.

There are some bullying behaviors that are only occasional or short-term, and the consequences for us will not be too serious, in this case, we just need to treat the other party as a person with a small belly, and then stay away, and we don't have to reason with the other party to lower our own style.

I am reminded of Zhang Defen's "Meet the Unknown Self", the core sentence: My dear, there is no one else outside, only yourself. All people, things, and things are external projections of your heart.

Other people's perception of us only has an effect in other people's mental consciousness, and if a person wants to have happiness, he must respect himself, not be a poor worm who lives in other people's opinions.

It just adds some difficulty to our life, we can use it as an opportunity to temper, practice open-mindedness and patience in the process of being bullied, and cultivate the ability to resolve thorny problems, so that the other party can not achieve the goal, and can only stare dryly.

When encountering such a thing, just endure the calm for a while, and then continue to go our own way! Don't take their negative garbage and spread it to our family, friends, co-workers, or other passers-by.

First of all, it is not "not with others" in general, but "not with so-and-so" in general. Because "others" refers to all other people except themselves. "Someone" refers specifically to a certain person or type of person.

Secondly, the "general knowledge" that Wang Chong refers to is the same insight and cultivation. Therefore, the meaning of "not having the same knowledge as so-and-so" means: not arguing with people who are knowledgeable and cultivated (poorly) (like so-and-so).

For example, for example: Zhang San has no culture, and he usually behaves rougher than the loose sparrows, so you "don't be like Zhang San".

Not having the same knowledge as others means that you don't have the same knowledge, don't argue with people with low knowledge and poor cultivation, and don't care about others. For example, if a friend does something bad or says something bad to him, he can say that he doesn't have to deal with him or has general knowledge, that is, he doesn't care, and he doesn't care, so he doesn't have to take it to heart.

Idioms are the treasures left to us by our ancestors – they are not displayed in historical museums, but are active in our lives – whether they are talking or composing, we often use an idiom inadvertently. However, each idiom has its meaning and rules of use, and using idioms at will will be a joke.

In a thick dictionary of idioms, how many idioms do you know? Follow me and "take" an idiom every day.

Today, our opponent is a very common idiom: general insight.

Now there are a lot of apps that release small **, such as Douyin, Volcano Xiao**, Kuaishou, etc., and I also ** one, in order to avoid unnecessary trouble, I won't say what I use. The other day, I saw a small ** that reads as follows:

Two men chatting over tea.

Left: Eh, you're so smart, I want to ask, what's the secret of your happiness?

Right (smiles): Quite simply, I never argue with fools.

Left: Hey, I don't believe it, I don't believe you can stay happy just by relying on this, you must have another way!

Right (nodding): Well, you're right.

Whether you understand it or not, I understand it anyway, haha. In this **, the smart man said that the secret of his happiness was not to argue with xx - here it can actually be replaced with "not with xx general knowledge".

**From the web.

The meaning of general insight is: to look at things the same way. "Not with xx general knowledge" refers to disputes between people with different knowledge and poor cultivation.

If the two people in ** have the same way of looking at the problem, that is, "general knowledge", the two are afraid that they will argue over "whether there is another way", just like two children of about the same grade who argue "whether there is any".

However, usually when we use this idiom, most of the purpose is to show "I am different from you", so we often use the negative sentence form: not with xx general knowledge.

**From the web.

Of course, once you use "not with xx general knowledge", it means that you think that the other party's knowledge or cultivation is poor, and you look down on the other party a little, if the other party is your elder or the person you care about, it is better not to use this idiom.

The idiom "general knowledge", will you use it?

Not having the same knowledge as others means not worrying about others, that is, people should be magnanimous, to be able to tolerate others, not to be careless because some people say bad things about you or some small things, don't take many small things in your heart, be open-minded and open-minded. Don't pay attention to what others say, as long as you are happy, it is the best.

The main content of the sentence "don't have general knowledge with others" is: don't care about others, and don't take what others say to heart. For example, if someone's friend does something bad for him or says something presumptuous, he can say that he does not have the same knowledge as him, that is, he does not care, does not care, and does not take it to heart.

The meaning of not being familiar with others is that you don't care about the gains and losses of something.

Such a person is big-hearted and can do great things.

Not having the same knowledge as others actually means not arguing with others and arguing so much. Don't reason with unreasonable people, then you will lower your status. Otherwise, it will only lower your identity.

Not having the same knowledge as others means not being like others, not worrying about each other, not quarrelling, arguing, and conflicting with him. This kind of situation generally belongs to the other party's more arrogant, not very reasonable people, and he can't understand the quarrel, he can't fight, he doesn't scold, he can't afford to provoke, it's better to hide, and it's also a more rational way to deal with problems. It can also avoid situations that may embarrass you or the other person.

Not having the same knowledge as others means that you don't want to argue with others, that is to say, you take the initiative to take a step back and open up the sky, but this does not mean that your views or practices are wrong!

Oh, if you don't have the same general knowledge as others, it means that this person's heart sutra is broader, and at the same time, if you don't have the same general knowledge as them, it also shows that your own words are better, that is, the ideology and morality are better, and then you are more cultivated, so this kind of person's words are still better, and they have some unique opinions of their own.

Not being with others means not caring about the other party's rights and wrongs, tolerating, understanding the other party's mistakes, and really helping you look forward to it

The meaning of not having the same general knowledge as others is simply not to worry about others, that is, people should be magnanimous, to be able to tolerate others, not to be careless because some people say bad things about you or some small things, do not put a lot of small things in your heart, be open-minded and open-minded. Don't pay attention to what others say, as long as you are happy, it is the best.

Don't be knowledgeable with others, the meaning of this sentence is to let yourself be open-minded, don't worry about these small things with others, because too much care will appear to be narrow-minded, but make yourself more unhappy.

I think it means that there is no need to argue with others so much. It's not worth reasoning with unreasonable people, it will only lower your status.

If you don't have the same knowledge as others, you don't want to talk to the other person, he may not be sensible, you can't be ignorant, just don't have the same thoughts as him.

Not having the same knowledge as others means that you don't have to worry about others because of a little thing, and you can't go toe-to-toe with others because of a little contradiction.

To put it simply, don't worry about others. That is to say, people should be magnanimous, be able to tolerate others, don't worry about some people because they say bad things about you or some small things, and don't take many small things to heart. It means being open-minded.

You don't pay attention to what others say. As long as you're happy.

Not being knowledgeable with others means not caring about other people's calculations. I see farther than others. Know more. Other people's little tricks seem to me to be nothing to worry about.

It is very measured, not calculating, and not disagreeing with their own general knowledge. Describe someone as very atmospheric and open-minded.

The phrase "not seeing others in general" is more general, which probably means that you don't have to care about other people's words or mistakes, and don't take it to heart. It can also be used to insist on your own attitude and not to argue with others.

Don't be general with the leader", there are two meanings: envy.

First, it takes its literal meaning. That is, as a subordinate, your importance is not that you always agree with the leader's opinion, on the contrary, if you look at the problem from a different perspective from the leader, or even face new problems, you come to the reasoning that is completely opposite to the leader, so as to promote the leader and make more correct decisions, you can be a good helper of the leader;

Second, it is the meaning of the term that people generally use. Even as a subordinate, don't blame the leader, you also need to be more tolerant, a little more patient, and don't care about the leader's misunderstanding of your own momentary affairs. Leaders are also human beings, and they make mistakes when they make mistakes, but the mistakes they make may be at the level that you don't know.

Most of his different demands are due to his gradual understanding of the situation, not that he was born without keeping his promises.

Why can't you take your leadership in stride?

This is easier said than done. If you can't do it, your work won't go well. In fact, the distress of the people in the unit rarely comes from the work itself, but more from the inability to calmly face their own leaders. From its own point of view, there are several reasons.

1. Self-limitations.

As a subordinate, generally compared to the leader, the qualifications are shallow, coupled with the low position, light power, the information channel is not wider and smoother than the leader, so it is inevitable that the knowledge is not as good as the leader. But leadership has its limitations, and often its limitations are your strengths. Your "fool's gain" may just make up for his "fool's mistake".

Knowing this, you should focus more on the limitations of the leader, rather than huddle up in the predicament caused by his strengths and your own limitations, and not be able to break through.

Second, the issue of face.

If you say something wrong, you are afraid that the leader will blame you for hurting your face, and if you disagree with the leader, you are afraid of hurting the leader's face. In fact, wise leaders (at least on the inside) look down on those who are only willing to make promises. Mencius had "if you say that you are an adult, you will despise it", in fact, he said that the communication between the upper and lower levels should put aside the concerns of "level".

Raising different views hurts small face, promotes correct decision-making and maintains big face, this account must be clear.

3. I don't know the leadership.

Although it is a matter of one level myself, to understand the role objectively, it still needs to be honed, including being led by multiple leaders with different styles, and the necessary self-analysis.

For example, the leader sometimes overreacts, and he may just be angry, which is normal for the human brother. Once said to his subordinates: I scolded you for anger!

His subordinates suddenly burst into tears. Anger is the emotional release of a person when he or she is under too much pressure or when he or she encounters setbacks elsewhere, and if his subordinates know this, they should not be too reassured, because usually the pressure experienced by the leader will be greater. If the conditioned reflex and the blood flow are immediately open, it will inevitably decline in intelligence, and the more you argue, the more wrong you will become.

The "pain index" at work will skyrocket.

Secondly, what the leader says is not all rigid instructions, many times he is just talking to you. Due to the disparity between the two sides, it is easy for subordinates to regard all the words of the leader as a one-word decision, and lack due authority in implementation.