Why are there always some people who can t understand art films?

The so-called "art film", as I understand it, refers to the ** of deep thinking. There must be the director's thinking and understanding of the things being filmed. In the fast-paced social life, modern people are more impetuous and fast-food consumption needs, and the same is true when watching movies.

These people basically don't pay attention to the deep connotation of ** when they are in **art films, and out of the expression of their omniscience, they will jump out and point fingers. This creates the "blind comments" you see. In short, the emergence of these "blind comments" is the inevitable product of "superficiality" encountering "profundity".

The purpose of film criticism is to analyze, identify and evaluate the aesthetic value, cognitive value, social significance, lens language and other aspects contained in the screen, so as to achieve the purpose of shooting the film and explain the theme expressed in the film, which can not only help the director broaden his horizons and improve the creative level by analyzing the success or failure of the film, so as to promote the prosperity and development of film art; Through analysis and evaluation, it can affect the audience's understanding and appreciation of the film, improve the audience's appreciation level, and indirectly promote the development of film art.

Comment content. The content of movie reviews is varied. There are those that focus on the theme, theme, characters or social significance of the film, and there are also those that specifically discuss the artistic style, modeling expression and use of film language in different film genres, styles or films; There are those who make special comments on the creation of films of a certain period and genre, and there are also those who write reviews for famous film directors, actors and other film artists; There are those who write columns in newspapers and periodicals on films released at that time or on certain creative issues, and there are also those who comment on films of a certain period and scope.

Due to the different appreciation realms or cultural backgrounds of readers and audiences, it is necessary not only to have special topics for film professionals to study**, but also to have film review articles to improve the appreciation level of general audiences.

If there are a thousand Hamlets in the eyes of a thousand people.

There should be no doubt. If it is said that people's understanding of art is deep and shallow, there should be no doubt. If it is said that some art is easy to understand and some art is not easy to understand, there should be no doubt.

But if it is said that what cannot be understood is art, I think that 99 out of 100 people will disagree, and the only one who agrees is probably the one who really does not understand art.

Art ** in**? ** to life. What are the roots of art?

It's culture. What is the essence of art? It is to promote truth, goodness and beauty.

What is the function of art? It is to serve humanity. What is the meaning of art?

In this case, how can it be said that what is incomprehensible is called art? Contrary. Suffice it to say, there is not a true artist who does not want his work to be understood and appreciated by more people.

Because only when you understand can you appreciate it. Only by appreciating can we get insights from works of art and reflect the value of works of art.

Some people say that many abstract paintings are incomprehensible, such as Picasso's Guernica and Les Demoiselles d'Avignon

Wait. It is true that Picasso's abstract paintings are not as easy to understand as realistic oil paintings, but they are not really incomprehensible, but relatively few people can understand them at once. In fact, as long as you understand the expression techniques of abstract painting and the theme of a specific work, and then interpret the work, you can completely understand the work.

Like "Guernica", it exposes fascism in an abstract art form.

** The devastation caused by the bombing of the Spanish town of Guernica. Houses are collapsing, cows are crying, and a horrible scene .......

Some works of art may not be so intuitive, but they are profound, intriguing, and even incomprehensible, but that is not the same thing as not being able to understand them. What I really can't understand is those pseudo-art and fake art, such as some ugly books, bamboo books, roaring books, etc., and some so-called "performance art, but whether that is real art, I'm afraid you have to put a question mark."

Not necessarily, I think art is what you can understand, and if you can't understand what you paint, then naturally no one can read the value of the work from it, and no one will look at it.

No. Although art originates from life but is higher than life, its essence is still closely related to life, and what is completely incomprehensible is not art.

Personally, I don't think that's the case, art is the best in life, it is very realistic, and it should be close to life, so that it is more meaningful.

This is the real art, and I can't understand it at all! Awesome.

Not all. Art is a culture, some people can understand it, some people can't understand it, what they can't understand is only more profound, but not all of them are art.