What is the difference between GF Strong Bond and Bosera Stable A B investment style?

Recommend GF Strong Bonds.

1. The global economic slowdown and the continuous adjustment of the bond market have brought significant opportunities. The downward trend of interest rates will become a long-term trend, and the interbank market is abundant, providing a good macro environment for the bond market to continue its previous strength, and bonds are facing more investment opportunities.

2. GF Strong Bond embodies the two concepts of safety and risk control in its structural design, and its rise in the past six months is far ahead of other bond types, and the stability of its performance is good, and it has been recommended by many research institutions.

3. GF Strong Bond has a unique design of the rate, no subscription fee and subscription fee are charged, and the redemption rate is only, and no redemption fee is charged if the holding period exceeds 30 days (including 30 days), which effectively reduces the handling fee for investors. For individual investors who avoid market fluctuations and pursue asset preservation and appreciation, as well as prudent institutional investors, low-risk and medium-return wealth management products are still their first choice. In view of the above situation, we believe that this ** is more suitable for the current market conditions, and investors are advised to actively subscribe to it.

GF Strong Bonds. **Type: General Bond Investment Style: Steady Growth.

Bosera Stable a b

**Type: General Bond Investment Style: Income.

Bosera's ** is good! It is recommended for landlords to buy.

I even bought a 5w Bosera theme and a 3w Bosera selection, and now the income is good.

**It is recommended to hold it for a long time, and you can see good returns after 1 year.

GF Jufeng has suspended the subscription and cannot be bought.

ChinaAMC bonds are not very good, they are rising too slowly.

The best performance of the Bosera series is good, you can consider it, I recommend Mi buy Bosera Yufu, Bosera Select.

Bosera is good, I bought Bosera selection.

The most scolded ** --- Bosera value growth.

160505 Bosera theme has risen in the last month and in the last six months. 270002 GF has risen in the latest month after being stable, and it has risen in the last six months. Choose 160505 Bosera theme to invest regularly.

Both of these are good! Have an eye!

Bosera selection is good, and Bosera themes are suitable for one-time purchase.

Bosera Theme has suspended its subscription.

Actually, these 2 companies are very good.

As long as you can hold it for a long time, the income is indispensable.

Bosera is often plagued, and I am more optimistic about Guangfa.

Hello! For overseas investment-based QDII** risk, it is not ordinarily large.

Are you a regular voter? If you plan to invest for the long term, we recommend GF.

Their differences:

1. Bosera mainly invests in real estate and machinery and equipment, from the perspective of operation style, tends to select industries and enterprises, long-term holding, weakening transactions and trend following, and has the advantage of reducing transaction costs, but at the same time, this style often makes the first in the fastest changing market ranking ups and downs. Since February this year, Bosera has been affected by Asia, and has been in the first place since then, and the net value structure is unstable.

2. GF has been investing in overseas high-quality ** and securities, especially after Pan Yonghua came, this year has hit a record yield so far. Bosera is 19%.

3. They are a type of **, which can only be said from the **manager, and the ** manager of GF personally thinks that the understanding of the capital market should be more profound.

The above are personal remarks, please think dialectically.

Hope it helps, thank you!

GF** has developed rapidly in recent days, and the scale has gradually expanded, and I am scheduled to invest in GF Asia Pacific.

From the 2012 and 2013 half a year of time, the two ** between the two, the specific performance also depends on the later ** manager of the asset allocation, the two ** from the investment direction and ** scale of the difference is not much, only personal opinions, thank you!

First of all, it's not just about looking at the company, but there is also garbage in Huaxia. It mainly depends on the first manager, Wang Yawei only represents the selection of Huaxia's Huaxia industry, and cannot cover the entire Huaxia ** company. And the regular investment is still index-based, which can effectively avoid the risk of wrong stock selection by the manager, I recommend you Harvest CSI 300, which is an index-type, from the perspective of the history of operation, the tracking error is low.

The underlying index tracked, the CSI 300, is well represented. You can go to the Haomai** research center to have a look, there are many consultations in it, I hope it will be helpful to you.

First of all, the regular investment ** should choose the back-end fee**, so that there is no handling fee every month, but there is no handling fee after the holding time reaches the time specified by the **company (ranging from 3 to 10 years).

Most of the ** of GF Company have back-end charges, and the overall situation of the ** company is good, and the ** holding time of back-end charges is more than five years. Huaxia **company** is also very good, and there are also back-end charges**, and the back-end ** holding time is generally more than eight years. Bosera**I don't know much, you can go to the company** to find out.

I fixed my investment in GF's **, which is the back-end.

Don't buy Bosera garbage** Huaxia's** is good, Huaxia's blue chips are good, my actual operation looks at China's** than the southern ones, and Bosera's anti-falling, but when it rises, it rises faster than they have southern ingredients in their hands Bosera No. 2 Huaxia blue chips basically bought it at a time Now Huaxia makes a profit of 2300+ Southern Bosera loses 3000 It should be possible to see which ** is better.

Huaxia is definitely good, there is a special ** rating agency for reference, Lipper or Morningstar.

It's all the same, each with its own merits. Huaxia Wang Yawei's is good, but it is not open.