If you want to do a dota commentary, it is not the level itself to be very good

It's very inappropriate, you don't have to be a god-level operation to be a commentator, but no one will watch you explain a game these days, because it's not well-known.

Then the game is not every day, and you are asked to explain every day, so the continuous release of the first perspective is the main means to increase your popularity.

Besides, if you cook, can you really explain it? Commentary is explanation.

It's not that the wanderer put a t, you then said, the wanderer lost a t The commentary is mainly to explain the tactics, some ideological problems, how the team was thinking at the time, maybe not 100% but you also have to have an 80% right, otherwise others will never look at you ** after watching it 2 times, unless you are a woman, unless you are a beauty, then ok, you are out ** I see 100%.

Not necessarily, but to be familiar with it, rookie, if it is an operation to serve the dish, it doesn't matter, if there is a certain operation because you don't understand the dish, then forget it.

It should be a very high level, of course, it doesn't mean that you play well, at least others have to play well, you can see that you are playing well.

At least you know the name of the hero, know which is the support, which is the late stage, which is the meat, which is the control, know what cooperation these heroes have, know the skills and equipment that must be equipped by the heroes, know what is the speed of playing money, what is the speed of the money, what is the normal value, know what is the core equipment and what is over-equipped, know which hero should be out of what... How to explain these words if you don't understand them, then again, if you don't understand these things, you will definitely not be a rookie

To make a commentary, you must have an understanding of all the heroes' skills and some tactics, outfits, etc., and technology is secondary.

Otherwise, you don't even know the skills when you explain, that's not.

Since it is more eloquence required for commentary, of course, it also needs a certain amount of skill, otherwise you don't know how to say some things!

No, Uncle B of the game is very 2

Not necessarily, you have to have a certain understanding of him, and you can't even remember the hero's code name.

We like Dota, we have a heart that loves Dota, it has nothing to do with whether we cook or not, if you want to do it, do it! As long as we learn more about it, we will definitely succeed!

If you don't have a first-person perspective, you just have a high level of theory....

Not necessarily, the main thing is to be familiar with the terrain, characters, and skills! At the same time, be very conscious!

When I see what I say, I think it's good to say more.

I recommend that you play Dota Goodbye Diagram first, you haven't learned to walk yet, so it's best not to run yet.

It doesn't need you to be very good, but first of all, you have to brag back, and secondly, you have to play a lot, and the heroes and skills are clear

Commentary technology is a matter of opinion.,The technology of playing is highly respected by NADA.,For examples, it's good to take a look at the first phase of the ghost from the top single row.。

This depends on personal preferences.,I think it's really good.,I like Haitao and Manlou level.,Their explanations are more humorous.。

There is no best! Only what you like!! For example, O9PIS1!