The private ownership of land in the West is not bought and it will always be yours

No, there are classifications in the Western land ownership system, one is called high-level ownership, and the other is low-level ownership. The former is all for extremely long periods, and the latter for shorter ones. Very few countries have land that is permanently owned by individuals.

For example, in the United Kingdom, for example, the term of ownership of land in the upper class is 999 years, and the term of ownership of land in the lower level is 99 years, and there is no land that belongs to the individual forever.

In fact, they also have landlords, like Britain There are still many nobles, and the land of these nobles is hereditary, similar to the landlords before our liberation.

There is also an inheritance tax, many capitalist countries now have a high inheritance tax, on average 30% to 40%, and some of the high inheritance tax levies more than 50%. The family property of 10 million is only 2.5 million for two generations. No matter how much family property there is, there will be very few inheritances, so many rich people like Bill Gates are keen on charity, because it is not much fun to leave money to the juniors, of course, this is also related to the difference between the East and the West on family and education.

In these countries, it is really not more than three generations rich.

China's land is state-owned, and the land used by citizens and enterprises can only be rented for a maximum of 70 years, and the lease can be renewed after 70 years, and the land transfer fee needs to be paid again (except for agricultural and animal husbandry land); In Western countries, land is privately owned, and land and house owners are required to pay property taxes (many countries exempt agricultural and livestock land). It is often said that Westerners buy a house and buy land (not necessarily), and can live and inherit it indefinitely (not necessarily), while Chinese only buy the right to use land for 70 years, and China's land system is not as good as that of Western countries. Is this really the case?

Let's take the United States as a representative and compare the cost of non-agricultural land in China and the West.

In China, spend 100,000 yuan to buy a piece of land with a 70-year use right, and after 70 years, the land use right expires, and the lessee loses the land use right (the lessee may not be alive). The cost of land for 70 years is 100,000 yuan.

Spend $100,000 to buy a property in the U.S. (with or without land, in the U.S., land and house can also be sold separately,), note that in the U.S., both land and house are taxed. It is necessary to pay 3-5% property tax every year (each state sets its own tax rate), according to the minimum 3%, 3,000 yuan a year, 210,000 property tax in 70 years, and 210,000 yuan in land cost. The land is still his, but it costs money to buy the land, and the money to buy the land and the value of the land cancel each other out.

Some people will say that my land will increase in value in the past 70 years, and now it is worth 300,000, and your algorithm is not right. However, please keep in mind that the property tax will increase with the increase in the value of the land, if your land is worth 300,000 now, then the property tax you have to pay now is 90,000, and the total property tax paid in 70 years follows the following formula: 30,000 plus 90,000 divided by 2 times 70 years, which equals 420,000.

In those 70 years, you will have to pay a total of 420,000 in property taxes. 420,000 property tax plus the original 100,000 yuan spent on buying land, you have invested a total of 520,000 yuan in land, minus the current 300,000 land value, your net cost of land is 220,000.

At the same time, under normal circumstances, the lessee or buyer of the land will mostly die during the 70-year land use period, which will inherit the property or inherit the right to use. In China, the inheritance of land use rights only needs to go through the transfer procedures, which is generally only a few hundred yuan. In the United States and other Western countries, inheritance of houses and land is subject to inheritance tax (agricultural land is also paid), at least 20%, plus attorney fees, notary fees and other miscellaneous fees, at least 30%.

The analysis shows that the cost of land in the United States is at least twice as high as that in China. Other Western countries are similar, with high property taxes.

China's state-owned land system truly embodies the concept of governing for the people. China's land system, in which the state holds the right to plan and the people have the right to use, is not only conducive to the rational planning of national land and resources, but also reduces the burden of land use on the people. In fact, only by rationally planning land resources and maximizing the benefits of land can the burden of land use be effectively reduced.

It is different, Chinese land is public ownership, that is, collective ownership, you use collective land, is the land of all Chinese, so there is only the right to use, not ownership.

In capitalist society, the means of production are privately owned, and land is the most basic means of production, once the ownership is purchased, the land will always be yours (of course, there are other cases), but the state can expropriate private land according to specific needs.

There are many similarities between the two in the current term, but there are essential differences, the former is public ownership, and the latter is private ownership

No, it's about the same as China! There is also a time limit!

It's like filing a patent with a time limit.

Legal Analysis: No, China belongs to public ownership of land.

Legal basis: Article 10 of the Constitution of the People's Republic of China The land of cities belongs to the State. Land in rural areas and on the outskirts of cities is collectively owned, except as provided for by law and belonging to the State; Homesteads, self-cultivated land, and self-cultivated mountains also belong to the collective-owned Suida.

The State may, in accordance with the provisions of law, expropriate or expropriate land and provide compensation for the needs of the public interest. No organization or individual may occupy, buy, sell, or otherwise illegally transfer land. The right to use the imitation land of the Gao nationality may be transferred in accordance with the provisions of the law.

All organizations and individuals who use Qi Xian's land must make rational use of the land.

Analysis of the law: China's land is publicly owned. At present, the forms of land ownership in China are state ownership of urban land and collective ownership of rural land.

Legal basis: "Civil Grinding Nuclear Code of the People's Republic of China".

Article 246:Property that is owned by the State as provided by law belongs to the State, that is, owned by the whole people. State-owned property is owned by *** on behalf of the state. Where the law provides otherwise, follow those provisions.

Article 247 Mineral deposits, water currents and sea areas belong to the State.

Article 248 Uninhabited islands belong to the State, and the ownership of uninhabited islands is exercised on behalf of the State.

Article 249 The land of a city shall be owned by the State. The law stipulates that land in rural areas and on the outskirts of cities that is owned by the State belongs to the State.

Article 250: Forests, mountains, grasslands, wastelands, tidal flats, and other sources of natural resources are owned by the State, except where they are collectively owned by law.

Satisfactory Answer: Champagne * Beer Level 10 2009-07-011, Private Land is a legal concept --- Private Land refers to the private ownership of ownership. However, the property rights of land are different from the property rights of other property--- other property only has the right to use and ownership, and land has three rights--- the right to use, ownership and exclusive rights--- private land refers to the private ownership of ownership, the private ownership of joint and several use rights, but the exclusive right is not private--- that is the sovereignty of the state, unless the state agrees, otherwise, it cannot be transferred to a foreigner or organization.

2, there are too many Chinese, and if the land is private, I am afraid that there is no way to go.

3. The private ownership of land in foreign countries is because the population density is small, and the main purpose is to develop land resources and rational use of land--- as stipulated in the land law of the United States in the 19th century, if the development of national barren land has been effectively cultivated for three consecutive years, it can apply for free registration of private land rights. Follow-up question: Is the population density in Western Europe and Japan also very small, why is there no way out for private ownership of land?

You are wrong, the population density of Western Europe is much smaller than that of China, and the period of high population density in Japan was after the privatization of land.

If China's land is sold once it is sold in 70 years, it is a sale of the right to use, not private ownership of the land, and it will not cost so much money to renew the right of use after 70 years. In 200 years, China may have private ownership of land. Follow-up:

1. Private ownership of land is a legal concept--- private ownership of land refers to the private ownership of land. However, the property rights of land are different from the property rights of other property--- which only have the right to use and ownership, while the land has three rights--- the right to use, ownership and exclusive rights--- private ownership of land refers to the private ownership of ownership, and the private ownership of joint and several use rights, but the exclusive right is not private--- that is the sovereignty of the state, unless the state agrees, otherwise, it cannot be transferred to a foreigner or organization.

2, there are too many Chinese, and if the land is private, I am afraid that there is no way to go.

3. The private ownership of land in foreign sections is because the population density is small, and the main purpose is to develop land resources and rational use of land--- as stipulated in the land law of the United States in the 19th century, if the development of national barren land has been effectively cultivated for three consecutive years, it can apply for free registration of private land rights.

Land can be privately owned in capitalist countries, but not in communist countries.

The land is privately owned, and the state sells nothing.

It is possible to achieve it when communism.