Why do men talk about houses, women talk about children in divorce cases?

I think it may be the gender difference between men and women, the difference in feelings, the difference in life personality or something, which leads to different results. The boy's words may be a little ruthless and don't care much about his children, because after all, it is not what kind of pain she has to endure in the depths of the child, and in the end, he personally thinks that as long as he has a house and money, he can always find another woman to care about himself to take care of himself, so he will care more about the house and property, whether it is his own. So he won't care too much about the child's affairs, because in his heart he thinks that the house is more important than the child in some cases, and many behaviors in his heart will be more profitable, so he will go further to do something useful for his future, rather than caring too much about his children, so this is also a kind of man's nature, I personally think that Zhongtianxin is not very good is more ruthless?

Because boys are more yearning for a relationship that is above interests, I think we still need to understand more. Because a lot of boys are so ruthless. <>

Girls' words are a kind of delicate feelings, they tend to be more concerned about their psychological feelings, and there is a sense of security, what that feeling, so they will prefer children because children are their everything, do not understand the mother's love psychology, absolutely more than father's love, so they will want to take care of their children more want to train their children into a very good person, In his opinion, everything in his life is not important, only her son is her most important thing, he will work hard to protect her child, if you move his child, he will go crazy with you, they can do nothing in their hearts, they can have nothing, but their children must be by their side, because he is just their heart, from the moment he was born, she began, slowly liked her own children, and greeted her children millions, we will always be children in our hearts, first. So many times for the sake of a family, for the better growth of a child, he will choose to be patient when his husband is distressed, so this is a very unfair thing for girls, so if you really want to divorce, then girls will definitely do everything to protect their children. <>

In general, boys may be more profit-oriented, and girls may be more emotional, so this results are different. Of course, is this also absolute? There should be different people, have different ideas, for different things, he has his own different ways of dealing with them, and some girls are chosen, and they don't need children, it depends on personal ideas, something, so there is no need to be too one-sided.

But sometimes I really feel sorry for the girl to do so much, but in the end I get so little. I also feel sorry for my mother, and bring your mother over like this, believe me, love is always great. <>

The house is the man's fixed assets, before marriage, the woman's parents will consider whether the man has a house, a man and his parents have worked hard for most of their lives to buy a house, and then start a family and have children, but because of the discord between the husband and wife to divorce. Men don't want children to ask for a house, first of all, because the house is not only their own hard work, but also the hard work of their parents, and secondly, the current housing prices are getting higher and higher, if the man gives up the house, it is equivalent to directly pushing himself down the trough. If you have a house, you can work hard to make money and marry a wife, but if you don't have a house, you have to work hard for the rest of your life to marry a wife and have children.

Most of the women's preference for children is because as a mother, there is no reason to abandon the maternal love in her heart. Children are the most precious flesh and blood in their own bodies, and without children, only a house, the heart is a huge defect, even if the second child cannot meet this defect. It's like a man can't forget his first love.

When you have children, you have the meaning of life, and you have the desire to support your children, and with this desire, you will work hard to achieve it.

The so-called marriage who pays more in divorce will hurt the most, and the same is true for children, who pays more for children, who is more likely to be reluctant. First of all, a woman gave up her body to get pregnant, the pregnancy marks on her belly are still there, or the feelings accumulated little by little in breastfeeding and taking a child, which are not so easy to give up.

You worked hard to conceive a child who wanted to die and live, I don't believe you wouldn't want it! I used to think that divorce could give up the child, but when you have a child, you can't give it up at all!

Whoever says that men want houses and women want children, it's too one-sided.

Because he doesn't need the child to give birth, he doesn't know the pain, he only talks about the child is gone, and he can have another child, but the house needs a lot of money to buy.

For the child is born of his own son, and blood is thicker than water.

The selfish nature is so thoroughly exposed! If you ask him to pay child support in a lump sum, such a person is unreliable.

If the woman is not at fault, the capable man will leave the house, and the house should at least be left to the children.

The following is purely a personal opinion:

Because the woman often takes the child, the child has a better relationship with the woman, but the woman is good at gambling, which is a very bad habit, for the sake of the child, I think the child should be awarded to the man. And the woman's family is even more detrimental to the child's growth. A short-hearted and unreasonable personality can affect a child's character development.

Although the man cannot accompany the child often, the family environment is more harmonious.

Both have their drawbacks, but in comparison, the child is more likely to belong to the man.

The house belongs to the man's parents and does not belong to the man. shall not be counted among the personal property of the husband. And divorce is caused by the emotional discord between the man and the woman. So I don't think the woman should get a share of the property at this time. If the old man wants to, that's another matter.

When the husband and wife divorce, the share is the property created jointly when they live together, the property belongs to your parents, the woman has no right to claim the share, and the children are generally awarded to the woman, but you and your parents are actively fighting for it, and the woman doesn't want it very much, you have a chance.

The property belongs to your parents, as the property can only be divided equally after 8 years of marriage.

You haven't been married for 8 years. So the property belongs to your parents.

"Although the woman often takes the child, she often gambles, so that the child plays with other children on the side, and the child beats the child when she cries," the woman does not have the conditions to raise the child, because there is no fixed economy, the house belongs to the man's parents and belongs to the man's property before marriage, so the house will not be owned by the woman, but the court should order the man to pay the woman a certain amount of financial compensation.

Make a fist or save your marriage, from the perspective of the children, and communicate with each other.

When you get married, the house is of course your joint property, and if you get divorced, you will definitely have to pay compensation to the other party, and as for the children, the woman is generally given priority.

The house has the woman's share, how old the child is, if it is breastfeeding, it must be awarded to the woman, otherwise, it is difficult to say, and you have to find a way to deal with the lawyer.

The court is to see who can have a better environment to raise children, and award it to whom, the house furniture and property must have someone's share, and you want to sweep people out of the house.

The house is not entirely hers, but it must have half of hers, and the chances of the child being awarded to the man are better.

If the house belongs to the man's parents, the woman certainly has no right to claim a share.

She can't ask for a house that belongs to your parents.

Children are usually awarded to their mothers when they are young.

But you can prove that she doesn't have the financial **. Unable to give the child a normal life.

And she has a habit of gambling. And hit the child.

Children are usually awarded to their mothers when they are young.

But you can prove that she doesn't have the financial **. Unable to give the child a normal life.

And she has a habit of gambling. And hit the child.

It's too selfish, how can I get married without feelings, how can I get divorced when I get married, why don't I think about my children, I am still so young, what should I do in the future, and I am ashamed to ask what to do with the house.

How can there be such a person.

You toss in a coin and a bottle of Coke falls out, and you say it's yours or is it machine?

The same can be said: the child is yours.

The judge will basically award to you, if you can explain that she often gambles, beats children, and has no financial **, so it is basically awarded to you. In addition, you don't have to worry about the problem of the house, she can't get it. First, the husband and wife share the joint property of the husband and wife, and this house is not your joint property, she has neither contributed nor money, to make it clear, this house actually belongs to your parents.

Second, there is only a foundation certificate in the countryside, not a real estate certificate, and the foundation certificate should only have the names of your parents, not you and your wife, so she can't share it.

The property belongs to your parents, and the woman has no right to claim it.

Generally, the woman's is considered first, but the house must have a daughter.

Ask the court to adjudicate fairly, or ask for help from a law firm.

I am a law graduate and work in the courts.

The house definitely has her share.

This is the joint property of husband and wife.

Hehe, a fact that cannot be denied.

I think what you care about is the child, and the most likely house is that the child is only one person and half of the child for you, because the court will consider your actual situation, because you can take care of the child, have a good educational environment, and the conditions are relatively stable.

These are the grounds on which the court can make a decision.

Don't worry, hehe.

Let me say a few words, if, as you say, the house belongs to your parents, then it is clear that he has no share, just as you can't divide the house you rented, it makes no sense. Hopefully, the court won't have a reason to find that the house actually belongs to you.

As for the child, believe in the law, and the judge will try to make a judgment based on the child's interests. What you have to do is how to prove that your child is better with you and that there is something wrong with her, and the law believes in the evidence, not just your words.

Hello, this divorce agreement is valid for the two parties to the agreement.

But this house is a real estate, you can't just agree to give it to you, you have to fulfill it, the house must be registered in your name, this house is yours, and the house still belongs to your father by agreeing all the time.

However, you can ask your father to fulfill the terms of the divorce agreement and transfer the house. You can also go to court and sue the father to fulfill the agreement.

Verbal agreement? There are no words that explain that he doesn't want a house. Even if he fights a lawsuit, he may take half of the property rights, don't delay your work here, find a lawyer to ask in detail!

Let's see how I can make him get nothing as soon as possible, move out as soon as possible, and save every day to look bad!

There should be an agreement, huh? Go to court and sue him. If at that time, in order to buy a second house, he faked his departure, made a verbal promise, and now it comes true, then it can only be swallowed by teeth and divided equally?

You better ask a lawyer quickly, if this situation is premarital property, it is estimated that you will suffer a lot, but it is better for a woman to grasp these things in her hands when she is divorced, and she really wants to open some if she can't catch it, after all, we are born with nothing, right?

The husband and wife have joint property, otherwise they will file a lawsuit.

First, it depends on how your divorce agreement is agreed, and second, the divorce agreement is as you said, and it is signed under the condition of legality and voluntary consultation between the two parties, which is binding on both of you, and if the other party does not perform, it will be resolved through negotiation or litigation.

Now that the child is more than a year old, the man has been going home late for more than a year, and then sometimes he goes back and sometimes he doesn't go back, and now he doesn't go home at all, and the woman now wants to sue for divorce. Given that the child is only one and a half years old, the woman hopes to fight for more benefits for the child and herself. So hopefully you can get a house.

However, the house was bought by the man himself before marriage, and it is personal property before marriage, and according to the provisions of the law, it cannot be divided as the joint property of the husband and wife, and it is even more impossible for the child to get the house. According to the law, if the child is raised by the woman, the man only needs to pay child support.

I don't know if it will work if the man can ask for the house to be used as child support, and after giving the house to the child, he will no longer pay for the child's living and education in the future.

There is also the fact that the woman originally wanted to negotiate a divorce with the man, but the man agreed to it at first, but later regretted it, and not once or twice. If the lawsuit goes to the court, and the woman says that the relationship between the husband and wife has indeed broken down, but the man says that he is willing to repair it, will the marriage still be divorced? (It's not that the man really wants to repair the marriage, but hopes that the woman won't get anything, and finally leaves because he can't bear it anymore).

The reason why we haven't left yet is that we haven't yet reached the best time to get the greatest benefits.

In the matter of divorce, everything is for money, and there is really no way to live without money.

The new marriage law is indeed not good for the woman. If there is no woman's name on the real estate deed, you will not be able to share the money now. It used to be okay, but now it doesn't.

Because it is to prevent the emergence of the mistress, and to prevent the example of the woman deliberately divorcing in order to divide the property, the current new marriage law is extremely inhumane... It can be said that it is especially unfair to women...