The military flag array is used for reference, how about this military flag array?

Updated on military 2024-05-23
4 answers
  1. Anonymous users2024-02-11

    Your defense is too flawed, and your attack power in the early stage is insufficient, and the defense in the later stage is not good. I suggest that you can put 1 37 in the back and one 38 in front of you, but you don't know the situation, don't take the initiative to fight with others. Actually, your thunder can be placed like this: thunder thunder.

    Demining is placed on the far left like this, and the big son is placed on the right and in the middle.

    Regimental Division, Division, Division, Regiment.

    Bombing company.

    Company bombing battalion platoon.

    Platoon battalion soldiers.

    Lei Lian's division soldier Lei.

    Brigade flag brigade demining.

    This is a guard flag,3 big sons in front of take turns to block the enemy's constant dead brigade level subs,These subs are very important in the late endgame,It should be able to reflect the advantage in the late endgame but that's not all,The main thing is to explore by yourself,Because.

    But we still can't improve your skills just by saying it, even if it's given to you.

    If you don't have a good time, you're going to lose.

    Actually: Playing the four-man flag is about tactical coordination, not a one-person game. So there are three points to playing with the flag:

    1.Tactical coordination. For example, if your teammates are attacking, you have to take on the responsibility of assisting and preserving your strength. If he's on guard, you'll have to think about attacking.

    Good luck with you.

  2. Anonymous users2024-02-10

    One word is good It would be better if the company commander next to the flag was replaced by an engineer.

  3. Anonymous users2024-02-09

    Generally speaking, except for those outrageous layouts of personal interest.

    One is that others think it is very general at first glance and has serious defects.

    One is that others think it's good at first glance.

    Your two layouts are obviously the latter, both are good layouts, personally, the first formation is more reasonable than the second formation and easier to use, first of all, the first layout, I say, this type of layout is my favorite style.

    The coherence between the words is very good, can be mobilized at any time, and it is obvious that it is to win steadily, not the kind of brutal layout, if it is the layout designed by yourself, it can also be used very well, which means that your military flag has a certain level.

    The advantages will not be detailed, if you are careful, not too inferior to the home, and are good at this type of layout, it is very good to go down, and it is generally like this.

    If I insist on anything else, if it were me, with this type, I would put the brigade commander in the middle of the first row, the army commander in the front position, the brigade commander in the back two rows on the right side, and the regiment commander in front, because the original battalion commander in the middle is still not small, and the temptation can still help the other party block it, but the brigade commander can use it better than the battalion commander, and then it is better to judge when the other party kills you in the middle, and when both sides open up the situation, you can take the opportunity to kill the other party's middle lane, Hindering and disrupting the opponent's offensive rhythm, the original commander's words, your original position is nothing, and it is also very useful, but taking a step forward can be better mobilized, because since it is a triangular mine, the opponent will not be easily defeated in the last two rows, and the commander can go forward, whether it is defense and offense, it is more convenient, and the other two are purely personal hobbies.

    The second formation is also OK, but it is too risky to use, some positions are not cautious, not too easy, and the requirements for judgment are too high, compared with the previous layout, the first layout can deal with most of the situations in general situations, and the second is more limited than the first one in some aspects, and the second is relatively easy to use.

    Of course, I personally think that you will definitely have your own way of playing and your own fun of playing chess, so don't worry too much about these, just play as you like.

  4. Anonymous users2024-02-08

    I'm always casual and improvised.

Related questions
11 answers2024-05-23

The upstairs copy is very good, and anyone who knows the military flag can understand it.

31 answers2024-05-23

Generally, there are the following types.

Single core: play with 4 guarantees and 1, let a big brother develop, 4 people put pressure on the opponent to pull space for the big brother, such as poison, shadow shaman, tide, and Chen. Defend the enemy or water man. >>>More

5 answers2024-05-23

Some people say it's good, some people say it's bad, and the benevolent see the benevolent and the wise see the wise >>>More

3 answers2024-05-23

Wei Yuchen's name is good! But it's not a good name.

Wei Yuchen. wèi >>>More

4 answers2024-05-23

Nubia is ZTE's brand with high-end machine routes.