When asked about shortcomings in an interview, don t know how?

<> in the interview process, the most common question that is easy to step on thunder is "please describe your shortcomings and areas that need to be improved". In order to prevent stepping on mines, such problems have the following "two don'ts":

1. Don't use the objective situation that everyone knows as a shield, everyone knows that fresh graduates have no work experience, so when fresh graduates are asked about their shortcomings in the interview, saying that their lack of work experience is a less wise way, the shrewd HR will definitely let you change an answer, and it will be too late to panic!

2. Don't be clever and give the answer of "clear and depreciating" "I am a workaholic, I don't pay attention to rest when I work, and I can't let go of a detail due to too much perfectionism, which makes me very tired." This kind of rhetoric can only make the interviewer think that you are too slippery and have less trust.

So what should be done about this kind of question?

1. Do a good job of job analysis before the interview, and select the real "aspects to be improved" that are not so important and relevant to prepare, first look at the key abilities, personalities, and qualities required for the position to be interviewed? Imagine, when you interview for a marketing position, you say that you are not good at communication, and when you interview for a financial position, you say that you are not careful enough, even if you swear that you want to challenge your determination, I am afraid that you will not be able to return to the sky. And if you are interviewing for a finance job, you say that you are more introverted, prefer to work with numbers, and communicate with people easily and nervously, etc., should not be counted as fatal problems.

2. To emphasize that you have been aware of this problem and have done what actions to improve, can have improved results or examples are best to take financial work as an example, you can be like this "I have realized in my previous work that I prefer to deal with numbers, which leads to easy tension in communicating with people, so I participated in a certain speech class, a certain course, how to exercise my communication skills in daily life, former colleagues Leaders have said that I have improved my communication skills a lot compared to before, I also have to do more communication with others, such as auditing.

In short, it is best to combine the job analysis and select the real "questions" that are not relevant to answer them, and also emphasize what improvement actions you have made after realizing the problems, and attach examples of progress.

How do you "talk about your shortcomings" in an interview?

What should you do when asked about shortcomings in an interview? Every time I encounter this problem, I don't know what to do. In fact, this receipt is not difficult, and it plays a very important role in the interview.

If your interviewer is not satisfied, even if you have a good impression of you at the beginning of the interview, there is still a very high chance that you will not be selected because of your shortcomings. Therefore, how to talk about your shortcomings skillfully and appropriately during the interview is an ingenious science.

First, be steady! Yes, when the interviewer asks you this question, you have to be steady! Because this question is not only about getting to know you well during the interview, but also about testing your courage and emotional intelligence.

Generally, people who are timid and have little interview experience may be stumbling, twisting, and not confident and calm enough, and it is easy to leave a bad impression.

If a boy is still stumbling in the face of this kind of problem, most of them will be considered that this person is too timid, and he may be timid to do things, and it will be difficult to achieve big things, and the interview may end here. Therefore, in order to avoid tragedy, you must be calm when you hear this question and stabilize your emotions before answering.

Second, it is not appropriate to directly say that you have no shortcomings. No one is perfect, everyone will have advantages and disadvantages, but when talking about shortcomings, don't talk about shortcomings for the sake of talking about shortcomings, don't be too relaxed and then reveal your shortcomings without leaking, otherwise the interview may be about to end. At this time, it is enough to say one or two shortcomings, and after speaking, you should also add measures and methods to correct the shortcomings, so that the interviewer feels that you are not a person who does not want to make progress.

Third, it is not appropriate to name the shortcomings that are unreassuring, uncomfortable, and affect the work. There are some recognized shortcomings, and you should not rush to admit them, and if you know that you really have this shortcoming, correct them immediately. For example, if you don't pay attention to hygiene and don't care for public property, these elementary school students know that they are not right, so please don't say it in front of the interviewer.

Secondly, if you are interviewing for accounting, secretarial and other jobs, it is not advisable to say that you are careless, have a bad memory, etc., and if you are interviewing for planning, sales, etc., it is not appropriate to say that you are not good at communicating, because this can almost mean that you are not suitable for the job, and then the interview is over.

Fourth, you can name some shortcomings that are "inconsequential" to the job you are applying for, or even shortcomings that appear to be shortcomings on the surface, but are advantages from the perspective of the job.

For example, if you are applying for a job such as finance, you can say that you are usually a bit picky; If you are applying for a job in accounting or administration, you can say that you have obsessive-compulsive disorder of repeated checks; If you're looking for a designer, you can say you're too accurate, you're looking for perfection, and so on. These seemingly disadvantages, in the interview, may also add a few points to the interviewer's impression of you.

When the interviewer asks me about my biggest flaw, I say: My biggest flaw is that I focus too much on organization and think about the order of everything first, which sometimes causes me to spend a lot of time getting one thing done. When an interviewer asks this question, he may think that your work experience does not match the job requirements of the interview, and he is hesitant.

This question is very important for the interviewer to eliminate uncertainty. Therefore, yours can be the disadvantages, but you must emphasize your strengths and relevance to the position, leading the outcome to the positive and allowing the interviewer to focus on the strengths and ignore the disadvantages.

When interviewing, it seems that there are often questions about strengths and weaknesses. This may seem like a difficult question, but it is actually full of small pitfalls. Applicants must think twice.

For interviewers, they don't like to be too formal, but if it's too routine and big, it's easier to backfire. How to grasp the extent of this problem is something that every candidate needs to consider according to the actual situation.

A conadvantage is a disadvantage. It does not mean that the advantages will become the disadvantages. Have the courage to admit your shortcomings and give practical examples to prove them.

There must be a performance of correction and improvement. Since we are talking about shortcomings, we must have a solution. The role of the example is to show that the shortcomings are real, highlight their own solutions, and say their advantages in disguise.

Be careful to avoid talking about your own lack of skills, such as I am not very good at Excel, not very good at PPT, etc. Even if you're really not skilled, you can practice more in your spare time. But if you take it out and tell the interviewer directly during the interview, it will give the illusion that there is no progress.

Before talking about the disadvantages, let's talk about the pros. First of all, before talking about the shortcomings, you can talk about your own strengths, and then change a disadvantage according to your own strengths, so if you talk about interview routines, it is best to think about this disadvantage in advance. Of course, you can't pretend that my downside is that I love to study and work too much.

It's so perfunctory that the interviewer will definitely be able to hear it. Therefore, it is best to combine your resume or work experience to talk about your own advantages first, and then talk about a sincere and harmless disadvantage.

I will avoid the important and trivialize, express it with more positive disadvantages and meanings, highlight myself, weaken my shortcomings, and at the same time inform the interviewer that I have the ability to overcome them, and turn the shortcomings into advantages, so that I can add points in front of the interviewer, and at the same time let the interviewer appreciate my own ingenuity.

You can tell others about your shortcomings directly, but you must ensure that you will further correct these shortcomings, and these shortcomings will not appear too much in the process of working carefully, you will strive to improve your own work ability, and you should avoid the important after this oak friend, and talk more about your career planning.

You can transform your shortcomings into some shortcomings of your personality, such as being more extroverted or introverted, and having a little carelessness in ordinary times, but you will correct it more, and the trembling shirt shows that you will resolutely correct your attitude.

It can be said that he is very meticulous, and everything must be checked more than three imitation belt times, such shortcomings can be prepared to affect their work efficiency, but the accuracy will be higher.

It can be said that there are several shortcomings of their own. But let's not say what the biggest drawback is. Because what is your biggest drawback? It's hard to judge.

When asking about your strengths and weaknesses, don't do it 100%, don't belittle yourself too much, don't boast too much, you can subtly tell how to face and overcome difficulties, you can give the interviewer an honest impression, no matter what question the interviewer asks, be sure to speak clearly. Be organized.

You can be a more optimistic and cheerful person, you can adapt to any pressure, you can also adjust your ability to work, the disadvantage is that your activity is not particularly good, you may not like some lively occasions too much, like a quiet atmosphere.

It should be direct to leave a particularly good impression on the other party, and the other party will also feel that his personality is particularly direct, and the other party will also feel that he is particularly reliable when he has anything to say.

Please tell me what shortcomings you have, this is a common question in the interview, the interviewer asks this not to expose the shortcomings, but to understand your shortcomings to judge whether you are suitable for the position, so when asked this question, how to skillfully let the interviewer you are suitable for this position?

The first thing is to stay calm.

This question is not only an in-depth understanding of you, but also a test of your courage and emotional intelligence during the interview. When the interviewer asks you this question, you must be calm, generally people who are timid and have little interview experience will feel panicked and don't know how to go.

If you are stumbling and twisting when facing this problem, most likely you think that you are too timid, and you will be like this when you work in the future, it will be difficult to achieve great things, and you will not be considered. So when you hear this question, don't expose your emotions first, even if you don't have any answers at the time, don't panic, adjust your state, and then answer.

Secondly, don't talk about some uncomfortable shortcomings that affect your work.

For example, don't pay attention to hygiene and don't cherish public property, these recognized shortcomings, don't say it in front of the interviewer, you will think that you are not as good as a primary school student, if you really have these low-level shortcomings, you have to correct them, although these shortcomings are small in the workplace in the future, they will also affect your personal development.

Another example is some shortcomings that affect the work, if you are interviewing for secretarial and accounting jobs, these requirements are serious and careful, and the memory is strong, don't say that you are very careless and have a bad memory; If you are interviewing for a position in sales and planning, you can't say that you are not good at communication and do not know how to deal with people, these shortcomings will make you end this interview early, you are not qualified for this job, and what else to interview, a waste of time.

Again, don't just say that you don't have any shortcomings.

Everyone has their own shortcomings and strengths, there is no doubt about it, but you can't say that you don't have shortcomings, which gives people the feeling that you are arrogant and think that you are invincible in the world, which makes the interviewer feel that you are not aware of yourself.

However, you can't say all your shortcomings, just pick one or two to say, don't talk about shortcomings for the sake of saying shortcomings, you can talk about shortcomings when talking about shortcomings, by the way, how you can correct these shortcomings, so that the interviewer feels that you are a self-motivated person.

Finally, the best approach is to say that something that looks like a disadvantage on the surface is an advantage from a work point of view.

For example, if you are going to apply for a job in administration or accounting, you will sleep that you have obsessive-compulsive disorder, and you have to check everything repeatedly; If you're interviewing for a finance job, you say you're usually a bit picky; If you apply for a design position, you say that you are very perfectionist, etc., these seemingly disadvantaged advantages can often add points to your interview and let you get through this problem smoothly.

After learning the experience shared by the teacher, you should always know how to deal with your shortcomings, and I wish you the best of luck to get the offer you want.

When asked by the interviewer what your shortcomings are, what should you do? Honest performance, you can't take the advantages as disadvantages, for example, if you say that you are single-minded, serious, and the pursuit of perfection, it will make the interviewer speechless, shortcomings are shortcomings, and the courage to admit is responsible performance. You should have examples to back you up.

For example, if you say you're stubborn at times, how can you prove it? The interviewer will usually ask you to give an example. You should understand the company's corporate culture and work characteristics in advance, and your shortcomings should not conflict with it.

<> this company promotes innovation, but you say you're conservative and inflexible. For example, your position is demanding, and you say you are careless. This is a big no-no.

Your shortcomings, which are tolerated by the business, are in the past or phases, have no continuity, do not negatively affect the work, and the best way to express them has now changed. This flaw was mentioned in almost the highest percentage, with participants saying that they were so obsessed with perfection that their colleagues and subordinates could not tolerate it, which put pressure on others and should be corrected in future work.

Don't bring up this topic every time. It's nothing more than a disguised way to praise yourself, which is a well-known problem. This is usually not the case with good subjects, and even with such a flaw, it should be avoided as much as possible, given its mention rate.

This defect may sound like a real weakness in character at first, but listening to one of the explanations, you have to laugh or cry. I was impatient, the leader sent me to work, it could have been done, I wanted to do it inside.

This should be corrected in future work. He gave himself a lot of credits. The interviewer may feel that the interviewee doesn't really know who they are.

No matter how much subjects enjoyed reading and learning, they also said they didn't learn enough. When I ask why, I always don't learn enough compared to the position recruited by the competition, and the learning is endless! Holding this answer is purely for the purpose of coping with the question, and the interviewer will think perfunctorily.