Mobile phone navigation is better or Gaode is better, talk about it, and it s better to be detailed

I'm now in AutoNavi Map, I used the map before, I personally think that the memory of the map is large, and it is more stuck to use on my mobile phone, and sometimes the loading speed is slow, and many times the location is not accurate! It's often mistaken! I sometimes have problems using the AutoNavi map, but it's much better, and I like its navigation!

So I'm using AutoNavi now!

It's very good, and it's very detailed, and the nearby Dongdong is very clear to point out, Kai Lide is a bit too big, and it's troublesome to install the offline package.

AutoNavi is relatively high, and the magnification distance ratio of AutoNavi is large, and it is also accurate.

Gaode has not used it, it is good, it should be there, and it is completely free.

In recent months, AutoNavi navigation has always been finalized, and several of my friends are also this phenomenon, reflecting several times have not been solved, and there is no feedback, and a certain version is more than ten kilometers away from the response, I really didn't say it.

Gaode's is good, I've been using it.

The two map apps have similar features.

However, the respective optimizations are slightly different.

It is recommended that you install and experience them all and choose the software that is more suitable for you.

In terms of positioning accuracy, the map is good.

In terms of memory usage, AutoNavi maps occupy relatively little memory.

If the phone is highly performing, it is recommended to use a map.

If the performance of the mobile phone is average, it is recommended to use AutoNavi Map.

Hope it helps.

It mainly depends on the use. If it is used for self-driving navigation, AutoNavi and can be competent. If it is used for low-speed sports navigation such as cycling and hiking, it is necessary to display details in more detail, and AutoNavi is better than; However, the city bus query seems to be better than Gaode.

In terms of traffic consumption, the two are similar, both support offline GPS positioning, and both require access to the network when navigating and querying. Both also support the synchronization of computer and mobile phone favorites, and in general, in terms of mobile phone maps, the two are basically not very different.

Gaud. Gaode map map.

That's of course the map is useful.

The map can also be navigated by voice, which is not available on AutoNavi Maps.

Hello, driving navigation, then choose high navigation Simple positioning must be a map, Gaode map is not easy to use, upstairs said the cost of traffic, positioning accuracy is average, map positioning can also be a variety of locations, quite detailed, offline map package and good use of the traffic is very little recommended mobile phone map is better or Gaode map?

Disadvantages: Accuracy, update is not as high as map.

Disadvantages: The offline function is relatively not as easy to use as AutoNavi Map.

Therefore, if you have a lot of traffic, you can use the map, with high accuracy and fast line update, and if the traffic is not much, you can directly use the AutoNavi map.

It's okay, personal inclination is high.

Each has its own advantages and disadvantages. In terms of transportation, AutoNavi map has better data update and data accuracy, and in terms of life services, the service types of maps are more complete and more affordable. At the same time, the application scenarios of maps are also richer.