What is the difference between the Warring States of Japan and the Warring States of China

Updated on history 2024-05-26
2 answers
  1. Anonymous users2024-02-11

    China's Warring States Period: The "Historical Records" determined the beginning of the Warring States period in 475 BC (the first year of King Yuan of Zhou), and the "Zizhi Tongjian" set the beginning of the Warring States period in 403 BC (Han, Zhao, and Wei divided the three families). The end of the Warring States period was the unification of China by Qin (221 BC).

    Japan's Sengoku Period: Generally refers to the history of more than 130 years from the Onin War (1467) to the establishment of the Tokugawa shogunate (1603). Warring States Period of China:

    During the Warring States period, the society was very unstable. At the beginning of the Warring States period, there were still more than a dozen countries in China, but the smaller ones were soon annexed. The remaining seven great powers, Qin, Chu, Korea, Zhao, Wei, Qi, and Yan, are known as the Seven Heroes of the Warring States.

    During the Warring States Period, there were hundreds of schools of thought, which was the first period of Chinese thought and academic development, and was known as the contention of a hundred schools of thought. Mozi's Moism, Han Fei's Legalism stood on its own, Zhuangzi developed Laozi's Taoist doctrine, and Mencius laid the foundation for Confucianism's position in the post-Qin period. Sengoku period of Japan:

    After the Onin Rebellion, daimyo from all over Japan rose one after another, and wars raged, and the people were struggling to make a living. The whole country of Japan was divided by feudal warlords, and everyone fought against each other for profit, which was really a great chaos in the world. Similarities between the two:

    Personally, I think there are the following 5 points: 1. The supreme ruling body has gradually become weak, and the power of the princes below has been increasing, and they despise the king. 2. People aim to be the first person in the world and dream of ruling the whole country.

    3. There are many talented people, and military theory and technology have been developed rapidly. 4. Rapid renewal, leaving a valuable legacy for future generations. 5. Finally achieve reunification and achieve peace in the world.

    The difference between the two: I personally think that there are the following five points: 1. China has far more inventions and creations than Japan, and its military theory also surpasses that of Japan.

    Japan's ability to learn and transform abroad surpasses China's. 2. The ambitions of the Chinese princes were higher than those of the Japanese princes (China eventually overthrew the Zhou Dynasty and changed the dynasty. And Japan is overthrowing the general and protecting the emperor.

    Although on the surface they have achieved supreme dominance, the actual meaning is very different). 3. The scale of China's war is larger than that of Japan, and the types of tactics are more than those of Japan, but Japan's tactics are used more frequently than China's. 4. China's theory of national annihilation is the highest theory, while Japan's strategy is much more gentle.

    5. China's ideological warfare is much stronger than Japan's, and Japan's economic warfare dominates the changes in the current situation. The above is my personal opinion that there are similarities and differences between the two, and there are many shortcomings, I hope you will actively discuss and speak freely, so that I can learn more knowledge. We hope you will support! Thank you!

  2. Anonymous users2024-02-10

    The period is different, our country is a period of social transition, with the collapse of the well field under the rule of the Zhou family, representing the disintegration of the slave society, what is coming is the formation of the feudal society, and Japan is the feudal society under the princes conquest!

Related questions
5 answers2024-05-26

Different times Regarding the starting time of the Warring States, there are no more than the following theories: 1It began in 475 or 476 BC, the first year of King Yuan of Zhou, which is the mainstream view; 2. >>>More

17 answers2024-05-26

It's just that Hideyoshi overestimated his strength, and the preparation was extremely hasty and inadequate, but if he was given time or more preparations, he might be able to create a miracle, but some people always say that Japan is a village war, in fact, Japan also has large-scale wars, such as the Battle of Sekigahara, the number of warring people on both sides is no less than a war in China, the real battle of Guandu in history, the statement is not an exaggerated description of the Romance of the Three Kingdoms, I personally think that Cao Cao is more than 100,000 people, Yuan Shao is more than 300,000 people, So don't always say that Japan is a village war or something, in fact, Oda Nobunaga already had an army of more than 100,000 at that time, so Japan's armed forces at that time were not inferior to the Ming Dynasty, and the overall output value of Japan was about 18 million stone grain, so the national strength was not inferior to the output value of the Ming Dynasty, but the reason why he failed was that the military generals did not work hard to fight, and the country had just ended the war and was in ruins, and the expeditionary force was more unaccustomed to the soil and water when it conquered Korea, Many soldiers were infected with diseases and died, the main reason was that Hideyoshi was a little confused at that time, his command was improper, and his military talent was far from being as good as Oda Nobunaga or Tokugawa Ieyasu, so this unjust type of war of aggression was doomed to fail, but Japan's combat effectiveness and national strength were not useless as some people degraded, we must highly affirm the combat effectiveness of the Japanese samurai and the strength of the Japanese country, and do not always look at others and belittle others with colored eyes.

27 answers2024-05-26

An enterprise unit is generally a productive unit that is self-financed. The so-called "self-financing" means that you have a certain degree of autonomy to bear the consequences of losses and profits. >>>More

4 answers2024-05-26

The essence of the horizontal and vertical is the diplomatic and military struggle carried out by the major powers in order to win over other countries during the Warring States Period. It is used to prevent the annexation of strong countries by strong countries, and there are similarities between the "continental balance of power" pursued by modern Europe. It is that the countries in the north and south unite to deal with the strong countries and prevent the Qin and Qi states from annexing the weak countries; Lianheng is "one strong thing to attack the weak", that is, to follow the strong country to attack other weak countries. >>>More

6 answers2024-05-26

The focus of tea art is on "art", focusing on learning tea art and obtaining aesthetic enjoyment from it; >>>More