Debate on Is it good to only test essays in Chinese 10

The overemphasis on grammatical, rhetorical omissions, textual structure, and forcing students to spend too much effort on this is long overdue for reform. This traditional teaching method has been going on for decades, and the drawbacks of it have been gradually exposed.

For many years, Chinese teaching has always emphasized grammar, rhetoric, and text structure, but what is the actual effect? Nowadays, college students have been learning grammar and rhetoric from junior high school to high school, but they are still full of grammatical errors when writing essays, and it is difficult to read them smoothly. This should be an issue worthy of deep reflection on Chinese language teaching.

When I was in secondary school, the focus of Chinese teaching was also on grammar, the meaning of words and the translation of classical Chinese. This time I talked about some grammar knowledge, and now "it's almost all back to the teacher". If I were to take the current Chinese high school exam, it would be very difficult to pass.

But it doesn't matter, I know how to skillfully use various language elements to write, and write very professional **, monographs.

The specific goals and tasks of language education should be very simple, that is, to teach students to read, read and use language to express their ideas. At present, Chinese teaching is, in essence, an outdated "annotatory" and "explanatory" teaching. This not only greatly increases the learning burden of primary and secondary school students, but also is not conducive to cultivating students' creative thinking.

In my opinion, the practice of "only writing in Chinese" fully embodies the principle of "applying what you have learned", and will promote the transformation of Chinese teaching in the direction of paying more attention to cultivating students' practical writing ability.

In my opinion, under the premise that education at the high school level has reached a universal level, the implementation of the stipulation that only essays are tested in Chinese subjects in the entrance examination for high school entrance examinations can be said to be a major progress in educational concepts.

There will be a theme for the debate

Of course, talent is the most important. But how are talents cultivated? We all know that the environment has a great influence on all aspects such as shaping a person's character and ability, and it can even be said to play a decisive role.

So today our two sides have different views on what environment can produce talents, and the square... Think... Opposition...

then thinks. So I don't know what the audience thinks about this, but let's first listen to the two debaters discuss their views.

In the middle, just follow your own process.

In conclusion, I believe that through the wonderful rebuttal of the students on both sides just now, you must have a deeper understanding and ideas on this issue. The reason why a debate topic can be discussed by people is that it has two sides, and both sides have their value in both directions, and no one side is absolutely justified, and if this is the case, the debate will lose its value for discussion. No matter which side wins today, it does not directly interfere with our understanding of this debate, and I believe that for different people, there are different ways to become talents, so the result is...

Finally, I hope that you can find a suitable way to learn and become a talent in the future.

Refer to it.