D7000 bought a set, 18 105, is it appropriate for me to match a 50mm 1 8d?

50 is a standard APS-C format portrait head, and the wide aperture ensures good background blur.

Your set of lenses is 18-105, with a full range of focal lengths but not a large aperture, and it is a wise choice to supplement an affordable 50mm prime lens, so I recommend you to get it! Very good!

Hope mine, thanks!

Pretty good. The 18-105 can be used for daily shooting and travel shooting landscapes, from wide angle to medium telephoto, avoiding the trouble of changing lenses frequently, and the image quality of this lens is not bad at this price point.

The 50 is cheap, but the prime image quality is not bad, the background blur effect is good enough when shooting at a wide aperture, and it helps to increase the shutter speed when shooting in low light.

This lens combination is not expensive, there is zoom and fixed focus, there is a wide angle and a large aperture, which is both convenient and playable, and then you can slowly practice your skills, hehe.

Suitable 50mm as the cheapest prime lens, suitable for novices to experience the effect of prime focus, so that you can know how to choose a prime in the future...

Yes, this header is suitable for portraits.

sold the pullover and bought the Tenglong A16, which is a classic head, parallel goods 2000. One head is used for two.

Digital different films, old lenses CMOS dust is not easy to do.

A very good classic lens with very good image quality; The sleeve is used for flowing water shooting, and this fixed focus head is used for close-up shooting, which is a good match and not expensive!

Now they are all matched like this, and they are standard for the people.

The cost-effective configuration is very good, but if there are conditions, it is better to go to 50.

Of course, the prime is much better than your sleeve image quality, the aperture is large and the background blur ability is strong, and it is cheap, but it is manual focusing, you can buy 50mm autofocus. If you have money, it is recommended that the aperture on it is larger and the image quality is better.

There is no fit, depending on what you need, 50mm is cost-effective, and the portrait is good. I'm the same machine and lens as you, and I'm the head.

Of course, 18-105 to practice, 50 to take portraits, to achieve more satisfactory results. In addition, if you upgrade the full set in the future, this lens can also be used. However, if you want to use the fixed focus well, the first thing is to connect the basic skills of composition.

18 135 is better.

The 18 135 is the D80 set head, and the 18 105 is the D90 set, and the imaging quality is about the same.

The 18 135 is slightly weaker than the 18 105 because of its slightly larger focal length ratio, but it has a wider focal length and is more powerful.

However, the 18 135 is currently discontinued, and if you want to buy it, you can only buy second-hand lenses.

If you buy second-hand, it is recommended that you buy a second-hand 18 70 lens, this lens is a D70 sleeve, Nikon's first-generation ED lens plus lens motor lens, very cost-effective, good distortion control, good color reproduction. It is a grade higher than these two lenses, and the current second-hand ** is about 1300 yuan.

The Canon 18 135** is twice as large as the 18 105, and the lens is a penny, and the two are less comparable. However, in terms of focal length, 18 135 is wider than 18 105. In terms of image quality, it is difficult to compare Nikon and Canon because of their different styles.

But in terms of value for money, Nikon's 18 105 is higher than Canon's 18 135.

These two models belong to the mid-range SLR, the performance is not much worse, Nikon D7000The sensor is relatively larger, the Canon 60D pixel is a little higher, the sharpness of Nikon shooting is higher, it is relatively suitable for shooting scenes, Canon has a high level of compliance, it is relatively suitable for shooting people, as for the two lenses18-135The zoom range is a little larger, but these two lenses are not much different, that is, just a few more steps.

The lens 18-105 is not much different from the 18-135, and the quality of the low-end lens is better than that of Nikon, and both machines are relatively popular machines.

It must be that D7000 is stronger than 60D, and ** is obviously higher. Let's talk about it briefly, I hope to adopt. D700039 focus points** Nine Doji focus points are stronger than 60D, a total of 9 Doji focus points, D7000 is basically made of magnesium aluminum alloy, 60D engineering plastics, D7000 viewfinder 100% pentaprism field of view, 60D96%, D7000 6 continuous shots per second, D7000 dual card slot, 60D single card slot, D70002016 zone metering system, 60D63 zone, Nikon CMOS size is also a little larger than Canon.

In addition to the 2 million fewer pixels, it doesn't mean much, and the rest is stronger than 60d in terms of image quality, production, high sensitivity, and even shooting. And **

18-105 is better. The larger the zoom factor of the zoom lens, the greater the impact on the image.

Choose more Nikon for landscapes and Canon for portraits.

It is recommended that the landlord use the head of 18 135, although it is weaker, they are both of the same grade compared to other lenses, Canon is easy to shoot, easy to maintain, and Canon is also easy to match with the rear lens, and the choice is wide.

1 The 18-105 used in the D7000 and D5200 are the same lenses. The body motor of the D7000 is Nikon's compromise in order to be compatible with older lenses, and it is not a waste to use lenses with motors.

2 D7000 seems to be inferior to 60D, but the actual performance is a cut higher than 60D, especially the continuous shooting speed, focusing speed, high sensitivity and noise control, etc., and the workmanship of the fuselage is much better.

The reason why 3 700D 18-135 is more expensive than D5200 18-105 is mainly due to the lens, ** 18-135STM costs two thousand, and 18-105 is only one thousand

If you don't plan to learn photography in depth, 700D and D5200 are OK, depending on which brand your friends use more around you, you can choose whichever one, so that lenses and other accessories can be exchanged with each other, and it is more cost-effective to play.

The 17-55 is arguably the top-of-the-line lens in Nikon's DX format.

The aperture makes it easier for you to shoot in low-light environments.

At the same time, the APS-C format machine can better meet the needs of the wide-angle end due to the equivalent focal length.

The picture quality can also be said to be relatively impeccable.

The new 24-120 4 is a member of Nikon's small triad.

Since I used the old 24-120, I felt that it was quite inconvenient to lose the wide angle on the DX machine.

In addition to the aperture being one level smaller, there is a little gap between the small ternary and the large ternary in terms of optical quality.

This is also quite a subjective matter.

Personally, I think the most important thing in photography is to impress people with content, not image quality.

It's better not to do commercial photography, the picture quality is the icing on the cake.

Judging from your shooting needs, I think 17-55 is your first choice, which can be used as a hang-up head. In the future, you can go up to 70-200 to make up for the lack of the telephoto end. As for ultra-wide, it can be put to the end.

After all, it is not easy to control the ultra-wide, and it takes some time to shoot and accumulate.

If you go up to 24-120, there may be some overlap at both ends of the matching head in the future.

If this is the case, the telephoto is fine, but I wonder if you can accept a wide angle of up to 36mm?

The above are just some of my personal opinions, and I am willing to go further with you**.

Zoom has no good head, don't expect one shot to go all over the world and fool people.

There is no dog head in the fixed focus, and you can use the fixed focus without zooming. Recommendations 17-55, plus a fixed macro head.

It's not like there's a headlong 18-200 in the world

As you want: the Nikon 16-85mm F ed VR lens is just right.

1. Choose one of the two recommendations 16-85

2.As far as my grade is concerned, I really can't tell the difference between 50 and 50, and the gap between the non-and the one is not big.

3.It's best not to buy 50, if the picture quality is not good, it is recommended to consider second-hand 85 or new. In addition, the Sigma 50 couldn't be viewed in real time on my D7000, so I didn't buy it, and now I don't know if it's okay?

I haven't used it, but as far as ** is concerned, it shouldn't be better than 18-105 there, after all** and zoom ratio are there.

Just buy parallel goods, 3000 out of the nod remember. In fact, the picture quality is not much improved compared to 18-105, and many times it is unclear. However, in terms of distortion, there are still 16-18 more than worth it.

6, the final result of my APS-C was D7000+16-85+85.

Zoom is the wife, the fixed focus is the lover, and the whole thing is still the wife!

It is recommended that the landlord choose 18-55, 18-105, 18-140 to hang up ,,, fixed focus, take your time!

With the same budget, I would decisively choose D7100+18-XX

16-85 plus 50

16-85 has a wide angle to shoot beautiful scenery, more than the set of imaging *** too much fixed focus head is very powerful, although there is only an aperture, but it is worth the price of 700 yuan.

The best cost-effective combination set.

16-85+50 bar, how to say it, not very good.

Don't look at anything else, just change to D700, D80 is used, that means your technology is also changing, standing at the highest place to see the farthest, listen to me, buy D700 directly.

If the budget of the whole pair is not exceeded, then changing the full set is an inevitable choice...

It's good that the machine is enough, the key is how the head behind the machine is, and it is not recommended that you change the machine now or buy a better lens.

Be decisive D700, if you don't have to lose money, consider D800 directly

There is no need to upgrade from D80 to D7000.

There are a few things that are necessary:

First, there is no substitute for a large aperture, with a very shallow depth of field when fully opened, and the focal length is also suitable (equivalent to 135 camera 75mm) to shoot portraits very beautifully, this 18-105 cannot be replaced.

Second, excellent sharpness, there is a great sharpness performance when receiving the aperture, f4 is already very sharp (at this time the aperture is still greater than 18-105), the image quality is better than the aquacal 18-105, no suspense.

Third, the minimum focusing distance is very short, which can be simply replaced by macro to shoot some sketches.

Fourth, shooting dim scenes with a wide aperture is a great help, allowing you to use a shorter shutter speed to prevent blurring, and try not to use high sensitivity to improve image quality.

Therefore, it is still recommended. Of course, if you have a tight budget and can postpone your purchase, this lens is stable, and you can buy it when you use it.