We recommend a cost effective digital camera

First of all, I recommend the Sony W170

I also only mentioned Sony and Canon, and in terms of digital, only these two brands are the main ones, and other brands, including Nikon, seem to be a little bit worse than that (personal feeling).

Reason: There is a wide angle ** and it is not expensive.

W170 and T77 ** On the 2 machines are more than 300 different in performance There is not much difference between the two are 1010W pixels What a smiley shutter Smart scene ......

The difference is that T77 flatters the front wheel drive of the T series, and the T70 is the same as the touch screen, and the 3-inch screen is larger, which is definitely more visually comfortable, but the battery of T77 is only more than 600 mA, the screen is large, the battery is small, and the practicality is almost The battery is enough to shoot more than 200 shots.

W170 is an inch screen button type battery with more than 900 mA but the thickness is basically 1 times thicker than T77 (T77 is only 15mm thick, thinner than T700), the contrast is the thickest point.

In fact, the main difference between the two is the appearance and vision, T77 is more fashionable, more portable, looks more classy, and W170 is more practical.

In addition, there are also Canon's ixus80 85 and so on in the same grade.

Sony's machine is inferior to Canon, but it's not that Canon is better than Sony.

For card machines, the imaging performance is about the same, and it depends on luck to shoot moving objects.

Because the shutter is not adjustable, when the light is good, or when the light is good, it can shoot well, and when the light is bad, ......

Color bias is a characteristic of manufacturers, Sony thinks consumers like bright colors, Canon thinks consumers like light colors.

Canon's irritability is better controlled, Canon's imaging is soft, because of noise reduction, shooting people is not bad, shooting landscapes is not sharp enough, not as good as Nikon.

Generally speaking, as long as the focus is accurate, the shooting is clear (within 100% magnification, more than 100% will definitely be blurry).

The stabilization is indeed about the same, and the caliber of the CCD lens is about the same.

Macro is mainly used to shoot flowers and plants, and sometimes it is also used to shoot information and ID cards.

After all, it's a card machine, and the difference in macro distance is not too big, and the picture should be a good point for Canon.

The night scene is the same, you can only define the shutter ISO can barely shoot, and it is estimated that it will not achieve the effect you want.

And the average user doesn't necessarily know how to operate it.

I just bought the W170 recently and it turned out to be better than I expected.

When I bought it, I also referred to the A2000 of the T77 Canon, and the 2000 completely disappointed me to the top.

Appearance: Sony's machine is indeed much better than Canon's In terms of photo quality, Canon is better, but this is not a big difference, not a professional, and I can't tell the difference, Sony's pursuit of bright colors and fashionable appearance Canon pursues a professional photo effect It depends on how you choose Other brands of digital are not recommended.

Sony's stuff is on the expensive side, and besides, he can only use his own memory stick Recommend Canon's and Nikon's Nikon's S550 is very cost-effective I'm going to buy it too.

I don't know if you like the appearance is more beautiful,Then there's nothing to recommend,If you like cost-effective,I recommend you canon sx110 Now you don't need to think about the pixel problem these days,It's generally enough,Or consider practical,Functionally,This one supports full manual,The performance in all aspects is very good,The quality of the image is also very good,