Which digital camera is cost effective

Samsung PL150 has the smallest aperture among the three, so that in cloudy days, indoor and other dim environments, it may cause high noise in handheld photography or it will be flowery. And it is also equipped with 5x optical zoom,I think it's a bit of a chicken rib,Holding this machine,Change to5X end,Imaging doesn't cost? Just these two points can pass this machine.

Canon. ixus

and Sony. DSC-W320** on Canon. ixus

Around 1500, Sony.

dsc-w320

1300 or so, but Sony.

DSC-W320 is 1400 pixels, Canon. ixus

It is 1200 pixels, in addition, the aperture, CCD size, light change, etc. are all about the same, the only big difference is that Canon is optical image stabilization, Sony is electronic image stabilization, what is the difference? Optical image stabilization Canon uses a combination of lens shift changes to achieve image stabilization. Electronic image stabilization is done by increasing the shutter speed and CCD sensitivity, in fact, any digital camera can be used for electronic image stabilization, obviously technically, Canon.

The ixus105 far outperforms the Sony.

DSC-W320, which is one of the reasons why Canon is the best machine. So we have to think again, is it necessary to stabilize the shake? For the average home user, it is completely necessary to shoot handheld at 4x light, not everyone is professional, and not everyone will bring a tripod when they go out.

Compared to the appearance, I personally think that the appearance of both models is not bad, that is, I personally recommend you to use Canon.

ixus105, although it will be about 200 yuan more. In fact, the Sony brand has a very good technology in optical image stabilization, and its image stabilization technology comes from Kemei, which is called CCD image stabilization, which is comparable to Canon's lens image stabilization, but it is a pity that Sony's machine does not have this design.

In fact, you can look at it from a more mature market, for example, in the American market, almost every one of them has a digital camera, and now they want to change it to a second or third one, so they will be more rational when they buy it, what brand do they choose? They put Sony or Canon in the first place in their hearts, then Kodak, and then Komei or Nikon these professional cameras, Canon ranks high because of its accumulation of traditional technology and long-term accumulation of professional status in the hearts of consumers. Sony has a glorious history in the United States, and even Americans are willing to think that he is an American brand, he has a supreme position in the hearts of American consumers, mainly leading in the mastery of all core technologies and perfect functional entertainment design and exquisite appearance and workmanship and grasp of fashion, like Kemei and Nikon mainly rely on digital SLR in the competition, because they have a lens system that traditional consumer electronics manufacturers do not have, and I do not recommend domestic cameras mainly because of its immaturity, because the core technology is in the hands of others, And the starting time is not long, whether in software or hardware there is still a big gap, so in terms of that model, I recommend the Sony T series, as well as Canon Ixus and Nikon Canon's digital SLR, I recommend you to buy Sony

T200, about 2200, the price can't be too low, hehe, it's the result of comprehensive consideration

Canon A720IS, 1800+ is very cost-effective!

There is カンコン when I pursue 1,000W pixels

A6502500 or so, the cost performance is also very good!

Good home use of this machine. Good value for money too. In the Sony T series, in addition to the T20, this is worth buying. Sony's night scene effect is relatively better than other brands. It is recommended to buy.

Canon has the best performance, and if you want to be cost-effective, you can consider Fujifilm and Panasonic.

It is recommended to choose the Fujifilm F85EXR Panasonic FS10

The most cost-effective is Pentax, a veteran camera manufacturer in Japan, with good workmanship, many functions and good effects, and the biggest disadvantage is that there are not too many service outlets in China.

If you want Casio, it's best not to think about the imaging effect.

It depends on what price the landlord buys.

Canon has a good value for money.

Personally, I think Konka is okay.