The problem with the Lakers is that they are too old and need new talents

You can't compare it to the Spurs, who have enough bench depth.

There are other reasons why the Lakers boss Old Bass did not choose the Zen master, and it has something to do with the relationship between the Zen master and his daughter, so I won't talk about it specifically.

The Lakers' defense wasn't very good. Now the defense is not aggressive enough. Watching the game, Nash was very positive but really couldn't prevent it. The Lakers can't keep up with the fast guards (including Atay and Kobe), and the defense is not very active, and the rebounding is not positive enough.

The Lakers have now switched to a position and have an advantage in height. It's right to hit the position, but the fast attack can't be completely abandoned, and the fight should be resisted.

Kobe Bryant sometimes sticks to the ball, and he's not as lethal as he used to be.

The Lakers' three-point shot is not good, and Atey Jamison Kobe Bryant is not a consistent three-point player. The combination of internal and external lines is not good.

The team is not united enough, and everyone is not bent on winning.

The Lakers' most critical problem is not that they're too old.

The most important thing is the right style of play and the cohesion of the team.

The Lakers owner's brain is hot, and hiring D'Antoni is the first big failure.

Such a good lineup does not play a triangle offense, the inside line Gasol is the axis, and then Nash leads the whole team.

But the only ones who can really run among the four giants are Kobe and Nash, and the Lakers' originally good defense was crippled by this damn run-and-bomb.

Why was Nash so strong in the Suns in those years.

Because there are all small young people who can run and jump.

The Lakers owner is brain-dead and thinks that with Nash and D'Antoni, he can play a gorgeous run-and-shoot.

Now that it turns out that this idea is really laughing off the big teeth, the Zen master is probably snickering.

I don't think it's right for you to think so, it's a rule that the NBA can't change if you're old and can't play well, but Howard is very young.

The Lakers problem I think is that the coach's offensive and defensive system is not suitable for the Lakers, the Lakers have a lot of hope before the game starts, but now they are losing in the West!

Alas, the greater the hope, the greater the disappointment.

The tactics are not compatible, and the lack of lubricant seems to be that the role players are the hard wounds, and the 4 fierce men each play their own matches.

It reminds me of the rockets led by Van Gundy and without Battier

No, Spurs are also veterans and very good. It's just that the run-and-bomb tactics are really not suitable for the Lakers, and the positional battle Lakers' luxury lineup is insolvable.

It's not that it's too old, it's that they don't get motivated among their players, you look at Howard Gasol, fooling around, cancer.

Lao Bu came to China to find blood replenishment

It's Kobe Bryant who does it alone, and his teammates watch.

They got Russell, Ball, both of whom are excellent assisters, and Ingram, who is an all-around scorer, both of whom are high-ranking draft picks.

The Lakers of that year won five high-quality rookies, Russell, Ingram, Julius Randle, Lonzo Ball, and Hart, who were known as the Lakers' five youngest.

There's Ingram, who has been traded, and now the Pelicans' leading scorer, Kuzma, who is now a good defensive and third-scoring point with the Lakers, and Lonzo Ball, who has become a good playmaker.