It is worth to study hard for task syntax issues.

It is the subject of the form, yes;

to study hard...It's the real subject, and that's right.

Here's the mistake: First of all, worth can't be used that way. The correct way to say it is be worth it to do sth

However, this will cause two it to appear in a sentence, and it does not refer to the same thing, which is a grammatically correct but awkward statement. If you can change the word, it is recommended to say it pays to do sth

Second, task is a countable noun and requires an article or plural.

In addition, the meaning of task is very broad, it can be an assigned task or any thing that needs to be done, which makes the meaning unclear here. Therefore, it is recommended to use narrower terms such as homework, assignments, etc.

The grammar is correct. It is the formal subject, and to study hard for task is the real subject.

The grammar of this sentence is mainly be worth to do, it is worth doing something, fixed collocation.

Please note that the structure of worth+to do sth is not correct, and should be changed to doing;Or change worth to worthwhile.

Answer: The infinitive is a non-predicate verb form, which can be used as any component in a sentence except that it cannot be used as a predicate: subject, object, table, definite, form, complement.

This sentence is the main table structure. The subject is english, the predicate is is, and the predicate is hardThis infinitive is not a subject, a predicate, a complement, a definite, or an object, so it can only be an adverbial.

As for what the adverbial is, it depends on how you understand it. I think this sentence can be rephrased as: English is hard for me to study

->english is hard if i study it.So I think it's a conditional adverbial.

Friend, hello to study is equivalent here as an adverb that modifies the adjective hard, and this sentence can actually be replaced by a way to say that to study english is hard

Quite simply, the complement of hard to study is is a kind of table structure, which is a little different from the general substantive verb. There are no adverbials in this sentence, don't take the words apart one by one, not necessarily every time you analyze it like this.

Whatever is worth doing is the subject clause of whatever

A: No problem with syntax.

Syntactic Analysis: Subject: whatever is worth doing, which is a noun clause quite anything that is worth doing means "anything worth doing".

Predicate: is (is verb).

Epilogue: worth doing wellIt is a prepositional phrase and worth is a preposition, so it is followed by a gerund as an object.

Translation: Anything worth doing is worth doing.

Adapted from the proverb: whatever is worth doing at all is worth doing well

Proverb: Anything worth doing is worth doing.

There is nothing wrong with this grammatical.

1，whatever is worth doing is worth doing well.

anything that is worth doing is worth doing well.

The subject is anything, and the defining clause that isworth doing modifies anything, which translates as: anything worth doing.

The back is worth doing well which means worth doing well.

2. If it becomes whatever i worth doing is worth doing well, there is a mistake in the grammar.

Because first of all, the word worth is used as sth be worth doing ..

worth is a preposition, not a verb, so the clause I worth doing has no predicate, so the grammar does not hold.

Hope it helps!

Anything worth doing, it's worth doing well.

Probably should change for to to.

The predicate complements the language, and expresses the passive meaning in the active form of the infinitive. If the adjective in the sentence is an adj that indicates the nature of things, the logical subject is the object of the infinitive verb, and the infinitive active is used to express passive.

This kind of food is delicious, this book is worth 25 yuan, and he is very happy to learn English.

hard is an adverbial, which is an adverb that modifies study.

It is a complement, and of course it can also be said to be an adverbial.

1. Some grammarians think that worth is an adjective, but in fact worth has more grammatical characteristics of prepositions, which can dominate noun phrases, gerunds with logical subjects and wh-clauses, but not with active infinitives.

2. worth means "value" when used as a noun, and if the subject of the noun before it has a plural meaning, it should take the plural form and add the possessive form'or's 。

Be worth to do is wrong.

be worth doing

Pronunciation: 英 [bi w du 美 [bi w r du.]

Definition: Worth doing, worth doing something.

Grammar: worth is often used in the sth is worth v-ing structure, where the gerund phrase denotes a passive meaning. sth in this structure can sometimes be used as it, where it is the formal subject and the gerund phrase is the real subject.

Synonyms of be worth doing: deserve to do

deserve to do

Pronunciation: English [d z v tu] American [d z rv tu].

Interpretation: Worth it.

Grammar: deserve refers to someone who "deserves, deserves" because of his behavior, conduct, and talents, and its object is often a word for reward, criticism, punishment, etc., and can also refer to something that is "worthy" because it has certain characteristicsThe object is often the word concern, study, consideration, etc., and deserve is not usually used for progression.

Example sentence: These people deserve to make more than the minimum wage

These people should be paid more than the minimum wage.

There are two common uses of worth:

this coat is worth 200 dollar.

The job is quite worth fighting is not recommended for other uses, and in this case, despite doing= to do, avoid using the be worth to do structure.

Use that or what to see personal preference, that is a pronoun that can lead the definite clause, what is an adverbial pronoun, and the same can lead the definite clause, the difference is that in the clause the former has no meaning, the latter has meaning. The latter question is of the same nature as the first question, please refer to the answer above.

If you're not satisfied, feel free to ask questions.

If you are satisfied, click the "Select Satisfactory Answer" button.

worth doing sth: һ һ .

It seems to be an active form to express the passive meaning.

Therefore, the ontology chooses C

The first one is passive, this book is worth to be readBut it is usually just said that this book is worth to readThe back doesn't make sense, basically don't use it.

Take a look at the question, according to the meaning of the sentence.

All right.

The first sentence is the verb infinitive.

It is a pronoun that refers to an indefinite tense to study hard, and the second sentence is an object clause that is omitted

l think that it is important to study hard

l think it is important to study hard is correct, it should be followed by the verb be. The first sentence is incorrect English.

Personally, I suggest that the second sentence should be able to use it is important to do sth

The latter is as the predicate of the object of the main clause.