The debate is that we should think of ourselves as small

We should think of ourselves as small, shouldn't the other party's position? This has to be explained clearly to give you an answer.

Positive: At this stage, the benefits of China's continuous expansion of airports outweigh the disadvantages; Opposite: China's continuous expansion of airports at this stage will do more harm than good.

Can the U.S. Guarantee the Safety of Chinese Assets?

Renren makes the lives of college students more fulfilling and empty.

The judiciary is more capable of supervising government than **.

The government is more able to supervise than the judiciary.

Higher education should be elite and popular.

Students' growth should rely more on external incentives and internal incentives.

Shanzhai culture is conducive to cultural development and is not conducive to cultural development.

Universities should be easy to get in and hard to get out and shouldn't be easy to get in and out of.

The benefits outweigh the disadvantages of liberal university education.

The criterion for evaluating good and evil is the effect, not the motivation The criterion for evaluating the good and evil of the action is the motivation, not the effect.

People are happy to live for themselves, and people are happy to live for others.

The minds of college students should be complicated, not complicated.

College students should be brave or wise.

The learning of university students is mainly in and out of the classroom.

Silence is gold, not gold.

It's harder to hold it than it can be put down, and it's harder to put it down than it can be afforded.

1. Pros and cons of middle school students going online.

2. What is the real beauty of middle school students' dress.

3. Whether the benefits of middle school students' pursuit of fashion outweigh the disadvantages or the disadvantages outweigh the advantages.

Whether to judge heroes by success or failure.

Do middle school students have to be stressed.

Are good times good for growth or bad times good for you?

In fact, I can talk about the following questions.

In this information age, should we follow some traditions or abandon them for convenience.

Is high school our only way out?

Is it necessary for junior high school students to attend extracurricular classes?

I think that self-discipline is more important than other discipline in the cultivation of civilized etiquette among middle school students.

As a middle school student, first of all, we must be strict with ourselves, be self-disciplined at all times, and improve our moral cultivation and civilized quality.

Whether at home, at school, or in society, you should be strict with yourself. In this way, you will be better, your literacy will be more profound, you can set a good example in front of other students, let others be edified, and everyone's civilized etiquette will gradually develop!

1. First of all, make a clear position: it is not abnormal to be different from the majority of people 2. Determine the thesis: everyone is unique, the scope of the majority should be grasped clearly, 5 people are the majority, 100 people are the majority, and 100 million people are also the majority, so we should make this majority as big as possible.

3. Example argument: You can ask the opponent what style of shoes you are wearing, there will definitely be people wearing the same as him, ask him what clothes he wears, there must be the same in the whole country, and then ask more questions, such as: pants, eyes, etc., but there will be no second one in the country with such a match, because this is your personality, this is you, so my point of view is that it is not abnormal to be different from most people, and you can stand on the stage and compete with us, which is a good proof.

Debaters can think more along this line of thought.

You can ask the other party for ownership of the business to be decided by the owner. There are only two answers: no. Q: Does the enterprise manage the owner or owner-managed business? Yes.

People who are not like most people are normal people. It is well known that the opposite of the majority is the minority. And some celebrities said:

The truth is always in the hands of a few. "Therefore, being different from the public is a manifestation of a distinctive personality, a different mode of thinking, and an advantage that stands out from the crowd. Throughout the ages, how many heroes and heroes dare to question, dare to put forward innovation when everyone is drunk and sober, so as to achieve a new era, we affirm that the future needs innovation, rather than according to the original model like most people, waiting for those so-called "abnormal people" to lead us to achieve the opening of another era.

Not everything has one answer, such as exams, exams have only one answer, and it's not normal to answer bizarre answers differently than most people.

People who are different from most people are students with bad grades or poor moral character, if they are regarded as abnormal people by other students because of this, they will lose their self-confidence, which will lead to a rapid decline in grades, and there may be other unimaginable results, so other students should treat him as a normal person, and the teacher should also encourage the student to build up his self-confidence, and gradually, his bad habits will change into real ones''Normal people''

Hope to be adopted Thank you.

No! Because they have their own personalities, each has their own way of life, don't think that he is an abnormal person because they have a different way of life from yours, if we eat hamburgers and you don't eat hamburgers, I also say that you are an alien!

Actually, I think you have a better chance of losing.

Pay attention to the body, there is nothing without the body! There is a saying: the skin does not have hair, and it will be attached! The skin is gone, where will the hair be placed? That is to say, people's health is not good, and their bodies are gone, how can they study?

Good study is built on a good body. The body is gone, how can we talk about learning!

It has been said that the body is the capital of the revolution

Now, it's not shouting "innovative thinking" and "ideological innovation" every day

If you want to make "technology" more important than "thought", many people must be unconvinced.

In my opinion, it is said that "technological innovation can bring about a revolutionary leap in thought", that is, technological innovation "drives" ideological progress. It is then supplemented by statements such as "science and technology are the primary productive forces". This statement may be valid.

The other way is to "be consistent with my path":

If we have mature ideas and successful experiences, we should not change randomly. Change and innovation are the right thing to do, but aimless chaos can only overturn the original successful model. So, what is the difference between "successful change" and not "aimless change"?

Only when the exploration of technological innovation succeeds can we show that the direction is correct, and if the technological innovation is not successful, should the ideological innovation continue in this wrong direction?

Therefore, "it is more important to innovate technology than to innovate ideas".

All in all, I still think this debate is not easy.

Leave an email address It has been sent, and if there is not enough you can elaborate. You can look for it again.

I think it's all important, but I also think it's more important to be practical.