Canon A720IS or Kodak 820IS Which picture quality is better The main thing is to shoot furniture Tha

8 million pixels wash 8-10 inches (diagonal length) ** can be seen, no matter how big it is, it is more intolerable. This is not calculated based on numerical values, but on personal experience. The theoretical value of the calculated size is intolerable for users with certain image quality requirements.

It seems that there is no Kodak 820is, which is suspected to be a mistake of Z812is?

In terms of parameters, the Z812is is a little better than the A720, mainly because of the large zoom range. The specific parameters will not be listed. But some people criticized Kodak's imaging quality and the reliability of the machine.

Therefore, I think that if you mainly shoot furniture, you don't need a long telephoto, and the A720 is better.

If it's not z812is, you can add me again.

Kodak's this one is actually quite effective. It's just a bit old, though. Compared with the A720, the A720is is slightly better in terms of imaging.

However, Z812 is a telephoto, and this advantage A720is can't catch up, so it depends on how the user chooses. It is recommended that you go to the market to see the real machine, compare and compare, so that it is more effective than listening to our people here--- say more, don't be fooled by those clerks, test the machine to test the machine, and never pay the money when you make up your mind.

Canon's A720 is now on the market with a large number of oblique screens, and the majority of users have reported to Canon, but they have not been truly solved.

Parameters for the A720:

The number of effective pixels is 8 million.

Optical zoom factor 6x.

Focal length (equivalent to a 35mm camera) 35-210mm

Sensitivity range Auto, High ISO Sensitivity Auto ISO80 100 200 400 800 1600

LCD screen size inches (110,000 pixels).

Optical image stabilization. Kodak Z812 Parameters:

The number of effective pixels is 8.2 million.

Optical zoom factor 12x.

Focal length (equivalent to a 35mm camera) 36-432mm

Sensitivity range: Auto ISO 64 100 200 400 800 1600 3200

LCD screen size inches (230,000 pixels).

Image stabilization Optical image stabilization.

Overall, Canon A720 has an oblique screen, and the screen is 110,000 pixels, it looks very unpleasant, Kodak Z812 I have used, if you want to learn photography, you have to buy this cannon machine, Canon A720 can only be played normally, about the imaging quality Kodak is an old brand, the ** color of the printing is absolutely beautiful, of course, we can't say that Canon is not good, after all, Canon's sales are very good now, but Kodak is worth buying in terms of camera history, make sure you don't regret it, you might as well go and see the comparison of real machines, You'll know if I'm right!

Depending on what you do, semi-professional, I think the Kodak 712 is pretty good, the manual function is better than the Canon A720, and the zoom is also larger. The rest is pretty much the same.

To learn photography, you must be canon, all manual, you can practice skills, prepare for the future SLR, the quality of canon is better than Kodak.

It is recommended to buy Canon well

This is the camera I use, which supports SDHC cards, and I use Transcend 4G, which should be SDHC standard cards, no matter how big they are.

I think Samsung is good, I'm ready to buy it, long life.

Of course, the two comparisons are Canon A720 good, just in terms of configuration, it is better than Kodak M863, one has six times the light change, the other is only three times, one has anti-shake, one does not, one has a full manual function, one is fool fully automatic, the imaging effect is also better than Kodak M863, and the overall performance is also Canon A720 good. The Canon A720is is recommended

A720IS, A720 from performance is a little stronger than Kodak.

Of course, it's Z812, at least the optical zoom ability is stronger than Canon's, plus excellent color, it's definitely a good choice!

It should be good. I also hesitated for a long time and decided to go with the Kodak Z812is, which is not too obvious and has a recognized quality problem. It seems to be more professional, and it's not much worse.

First of all, in terms of imaging. There is not much difference between the two. Each has its own merits in terms of lenses.

Personally, I prefer Canon. The repair rate of Kodak cameras in the past two years is too high, and the 812 has **uneven when shooting night scenes. And the standby time of the AA rechargeable battery is not long.

It is best to use CRV3 lithium batteries.

Kodak Z812is is obviously more confident.

A720IS does not have a B door, aperture, and no rib in front of the telescopic lens, and cannot be directly equipped with additional lenses, which can only be solved by installing a special adapter on the fuselage.

Card machine,Can't install a filter or something.,Take a ruler and measure it yourself.。

The landlord can go to the official website to find out, and I personally feel that Canon's lens is still very good. It is recommended that 600d with 18-55 is available, with rich configurations and good imaging. Feel and weight are OK, for beginners who love photography, this is a very good model, easy to use, easy to control, 18-55 is also suitable for novices, **low.

A machine with the most complete and powerful manual functions.

The resolution of the lens is higher than that of the 590720.

The imaging quality is also better.

These two Kodak Nikon macros are too bad.

The range of manual functions is also not as wide as the 720.