Which is better Canon SX100is or Sony H3?

The SX100, of course

Here's why. The screen is much more delicate than the H3.

The lens has an automatic lens cap, which makes daily maintenance easier, and the H3 needs to be manually covered.

The battery is two No. 5, non-dedicated, cheaper and more convenient to use and replacement, and H3 is a more expensive special lithium battery, while the H3 battery is not durable, and the later investment will be great.

There are more aperture priority and shutter priority than H3, and the M stop is fully manual, H3 only has a simple manual function, although it can also adjust the aperture size, but only two steps can be adjusted, which is not professional enough.

I think the only advantage of the H3 is that it has an optical viewfinder, which is a bit easier to use in strong sunlight.

It can only be said that each has its own characteristics, the H3 has a good reputation, and the imaging of the SX100 needs to be improved.

Canon SX100 good: higher pixels than H3, 2With AA batteries, 3SD memory card with good price parity performance, 4Aperture, shutter, ** priority.

The imaging of the H3 is not as good as that of the SX100, so don't confuse the public with a few people. And the function of the H3 is very stupid, it is nothing more than a better look in appearance.

I'm using the sx100 now, and I feel okay, so let's take a look at the parameters and compare them first, and what to buy depends on what you like. For domestic use, enough. I bought it in Gome, bare metal 2150, and a 2G SD card was given away, and there was an invoice.

In addition, I bought Pinsheng fast and easy to charge + 2 pairs of 2300 mAh batteries for 105 yuan. FYI! When I bought it, I checked it for highlights, and mine was fine, no.

Among the two models, Canon SX100 and Canon SX300, Canon SX100 is a model that really exists objectively, while Canon SX300 does not seem to exist. So, compared to the two, of course, the Canon SX100 is better.

The Canon SX100 is a card player released in 2007. It has a 1-inch image sensor with 8.3 million pixels and a 10x optical zoom equivalent of 36-360mm.

And the Canon SX300, it seems that there is no ......Canon has the A300 and the SX30, but it doesn't seem to have the SX300.

As for the Canon SX30 and A300, the two cameras ......

The SX30 is a telephoto camera released in 2010. It has a 1-inch image sensor with 14.1 million pixels and a 35x optical zoom equivalent from 24-840mm.

The A100 is a card player released in 2003. The image sensor size is 1 inch, 3.3 million pixels, and 5x optical zoom.

As you can see, these models are low-end camera ...... with very small image sensor sizesThe SX30 is a relatively high-end camera in terms of overall indicators, but it is also a low-end camera. And it's been released a long time ago......So, none of these cameras are good ......

Pixel:100 is 16 million,230 is 12 million,100 can be washed larger**,But the relative picture quality is also slightly worse。

Wide angle: 100 is 25, 230 is 28, 100 is more advantageous when shooting landscapes or large scenes.

Screen: The touch screen of the 100 is better and more practical than the 230.

Color: The Sony is really inferior to the Canon in this regard, with the 230's colors being more vivid and flattering than the 100.

Night scene: 100 has handheld night scene continuous compositing, and 230 has HS engine, which has better continuous shooting synthesis effect and less noise.

Focal length: 100 is only 25-100, which belongs to the daily focal length, while 230 is 28-224, with a small telephoto, 230 is more convenient when traveling.

Battery: 100 batteries are not very powerful, more than 100 sheets; The 230 is slightly better, around 200 sheets.

There are many similarities, such as macro and continuous shooting, but since the two are almost the same, they will not be compared.

In general, both are more fun fashion machines, the 100 is more fashionable and more suitable for home use, and the 230 can be used for home and travel.

I personally recommend TX100.

Speak for the data, take a look at the address below.

The Sony TX100 periscope lens is more portable, and the Canon 230HS is a telescopic lens with more functions, each with its own strengths, and it is not exactly the same type of camera.

TX100, good-looking, gorgeous, but still 230HS performance is good, when Sony is out**, TX100 price adjustment, down more than 400, not value retention at all, T series Sony cameras have a good appearance, as for the value preservation, 230 will be sold after a while, it will be more cost-effective, the current price is a bit high, it is better to buy 220HS, 230HS is a little larger than 220HS zoom, it is eight times, but 220HS is larger than 230 The wide angle is 24, and the zoom is big and useless, And not a telescope, hehe, it's just a personal opinion, just for reference.

The larger the sensor size, the better, for better imaging and quality! The smaller the shutter speed parameter, the better, so you can capture the instant image as quickly as possible!

When it comes to cameras, Canon is a bit more professional!

1. The sensor area of the two machines is the same, but Canon uses CCD, and Sony uses back-illuminated CMOS. Under the premise of bright light, CCD imaging is more solid and the color is better; On the other hand, back-illuminated CMOS is characterized by high sensitivity and low noise. Due to the small bottom of 1, high sensitivity is not a strong point, and in comparison, the advantages of CCD are more practical.

2. The lens quality of HX30 and SX500 is about the same, and the G lens used by Sony should be better than that of Canon, but from the evaluation data, there is no qualitative breakthrough;

3. The image engine, that is, the chip. As an optical boss, Canon's research and development of DigiC chips is very good, and it has a good reputation in the industry; The BIONZ chip developed by the electronics tycoon Sony is slightly worse than Canon's in terms of performance. Although Canon colors and Sony colors have their own merits, Canon's color reproduction is better.

5. Canon's IS stabilization is better;

6. Neither of these two cameras can beat the other, and the performance difference is not very big. Personally, I feel that CCD sensors are better than CMOS. (The CCD sensor imaging is more transparent, but it is more power-intensive, and the larger the area, the more expensive the cost, so now Luchun's SLR is stupid and uses CMOS).

For the landlord's reference.

Canon SX500 is good, first of all, the SX500 release date is late, the product is relatively new, secondly, the appearance of the SX500 is more professional than the HX30, the grip is better, and finally the SX500 positioning is relatively accurate, there is a telephoto lens that specializes in slag and industry, Canon's product balance beam answer card is more trusted, and the HX30 still reduces the image quality of some of the wisdom for portability.

Or Canon's SX500 is a little better than a telephoto lens.

Sony HX30 belongs to the zoom card machine, which is easy to carry, and when it comes, the picture quality is lacking.

The Sony NEX series is now cheaper and easy to carry.