Lawyer friend to take a look at it, a lawyer please come in and take a look

The lawsuit is not so easy to fight First of all, you ask a lawyer for money, "this can go to the law firm, but there is no need to go for this matter" again, you have to sue others to pay a lawsuit fee first, and then you have to investigate and collect evidence, and finally notify you that it will take time to go to court If you are not very complaining or you are full and have nothing to do, then don't go to the lawsuit, because that is not a very fun thing When it is a lawsuit, the cost is very high You have to be mentally prepared And if you want to learn how to fight a lawsuit, you can read the Civil Procedure Law, There are various legal processes that will help you, but if you want to hire a lawyer, then you don't need to read those books at all, because the lawyer will solve it for you, and according to my opinion, the private school is not in breach of contract I don't know if you have reached any agreement with this private school in advance to specify that someone teach you to dance, if not, then the school is not in breach of contract because you are learning dance at a dance school and not from somebody, and the school is doing its duty to transfer another teacher to teach you, so there is no breach of contract Of course, the chances of you winning this lawsuit are very small, and there is no need to fight it, as long as the teacher who teaches you now teaches you with his heart, so why bother

There must be a basis for the withdrawal of the teacher when the teacher is transferred, and the replacement of the teacher shall not be a reason for the refund of tuition fees if it is not agreed in the contract.

The amount of money prosecuted in this case is smaller, the cost is higher, and the risk is greater.

This depends on the specific situation: according to China's current criminal law, a person who intentionally injures and causes serious injury shall be sentenced to fixed-term imprisonment of not less than three years but not more than ten years.

According to Article 87 of the Criminal Law of the People's Republic of China, where the statutory maximum penalty is between 5 and 10 years imprisonment, it is not retroactive after 10 years.

So your case has passed the criminal law retroactive time limit. That person can no longer be held criminally responsible.

But the statute of limitations for civil tort is 20 years, if your grandfather's body is still damaged because it was 20 years ago. You can claim civil compensation from him.

It's hard to say that you're in this situation, and you should have passed the retrospective period.

The key is that you have proof.

1. Regarding the debt owed to you, it is best to ask him to make up an IOU now. If he does not repay the IOU, find a witness (preferably someone from your village committee) to ask him to admit his debt to you and write a letter of commitment to repay it.

3. On the issue of your sister's divorce: The Marriage Law stipulates that if Party B is at fault, the divorce will be divided with little or no property. Therefore, you should be prepared with evidence of the man's gambling, especially the evidence that the man's gambling has ruined the property.

4. On the issue of alimony for the elderly: if the man is an only son and his father is unable to work, he should leave appropriate living expenses for the elderly, including a house, at the time of divorce;

For details, we recommend that you take a look at the Marriage Law and related judicial interpretations.

First, your sister can successfully dissolve the marriage relationship with him, the marriage law stipulates that if the other party has gambling and other vices, one party files for divorce, and the court should support it.

Second, as long as your sister wants a son, the son should belong to your sister, because the son is young and it is beneficial for him to grow up with his mother, and your brother-in-law has a gambling habit, which is not conducive to the child's growth, so he can earn custody of the child.

Third, the issue of property division, now there are only 2 houses left in the joint property of the husband and wife, one of which if you have evidence to prove that you have invested half of it, then only the other half can be regarded as their joint property, and then divide it, that is, the house is divided equally. However, if your brother-in-law is at fault and does not care about the family, you can consider compensating the woman, and you can give more points appropriately.

Fourth, ask the other party to pay monthly child support.

All of you have no evidence that the courts can hardly support.

I am a lawyer in Shanghai. I am more sympathetic to the situation you said.

1. If the property is purchased before marriage and the property certificate is registered without the woman's name, then whether there is a joint repayment of the loan after marriage? If the loan is repaid after marriage, the part of the loan repayment shall be the woman's share.

If the loan is not repaid after marriage, it is not the woman's property, even if it is said that the man's parents gave them the purpose of marriage.

2. The company's profits: (1) Ask a lawyer to go to the industrial and commercial bureau to obtain the company's business records, capital contribution shares, etc.

3. Proof of debt: First, if it is a debt, there must be other evidence to prove the true existence of the debt.

For example, the debt certificate was signed a few years ago. Then a judicial appraisal is required to prove that the time of payment is written later and is false. For example, how much money is paid, whether there is other evidence to prove what is owed, how the money is formed, and so on.

Therefore, it is hoped that a local professional lawyer can be hired to conduct the lawsuit. If the woman does not know the debt, there is no reason for not repaying the money.

4. If there is information such as the man's **, bank deposits, etc., I hope to ask the lawyer to apply for a court investigation order for inquiry.

It is recommended to find a lawyer for detailed consultation, it is too troublesome to ask questions online.

In the final analysis, it is a matter of proof, as long as any party has the ability to produce evidence, it will be supported by the court.

What you describe is not very specific. For example, how many years have you been married? Is there a mortgage on the house? What is the profit of the company after marriage? And so on?

If the property is not divided at the time of divorce, or the waiver is fraudulent, you can sue within one year of the divorce and request a new division.

Interpretation II of the Marriage Law

Article 9: Where both men and women reverse their feelings on the issue of property division within one year of divorce by mutual agreement, and request that the property division agreement be modified or revoked, the people's court shall accept it.

Where, after trial, the people's court does not discover that there was fraud or coercion at the time of entering into the property division agreement, it shall reject the parties' litigation claims in accordance with law.

A lawsuit may be filed for the division of common property.

Not for more than two years.

If it is difficult, the husband pays child support.

Romantic relationships are not protected by law and can be resolved through negotiation.

It's not good to help, you can only default, wait for the other party to sue, and then adjust this **, or property division! It's just that when you look at your children in the future, you will be restricted by the other party.