The boy who was responsible for the incident was primarily responsible for the recovery of the boy s

I just saw this news, the boy who urinated on the elevator recovered, and **The child also showed a picture of the family holding the boy's right hand 2**. There is a paragraph that is bolded and amplified, the boy is a four-generation single biography, has seven aunts, and has been pampered since childhood.

Speaking of which, everyone should understand the main reason for this incident. I've never heard of peeing in the elevator, and it's urinating on the control box of the elevator, and if you dare to do something like Chu outside, you can't become an emperor at home. <>

In terms of accident responsibility, property management should be said to have no responsibility. Some people may say that you don't set clear warning signs, and that's a dereliction of duty. I suddenly remembered that there was a lawsuit in the United States before, there was an otaku who stuffed a white light bulb into his mouth, but the result was that he couldn't get it out, so he had to go to the hospital to take it out, and then this otaku sued the manufacturer of the incandescent light bulb in court, because the manufacturer did not indicate that swallowing was prohibited in the instruction manual, and the funniest thing was that the otaku actually won, and the manufacturer paid him a fee.

Therefore, many people compare this matter and believe that the property is responsible. Suffice it to say that this is China, not the United States.

Families with parenting experience will know that spoiling is the most hopeless, and the consequences of the slightest are financial losses and physical harm, and if hidden, it can be a threat to life and even jail time. The boy who urinated on the elevator was obviously poisoned by doting, and the poisoning was very deep, and I have to say that the child's parents almost buried the child with their own hands. The main responsibility for this accident should be borne by the child's guardian, and I think they should also be responsible for the damage to the elevator, after all, the child has become what it is today, and you are the most responsible subject.

Recently, this news has spread to the public, and it has also caused heated discussions among everyone. I think that although the boy has been hurt, the main responsibility should be borne by the boy's parents.

First of all, there is no responsibility of the property management company, and there is no responsibility of the community, and it is not because of the inaction of the property that caused the child to be injured. Although the property has implemented monitoring of the elevator, it is a very short period of time from the child peeing to the elevator accident, and there are so many cameras in the community that it is impossible to ask someone to supervise one person. So it's normal not to find it, and even if it does, there is no way to take remedial measures, after all, the security guard still has time to react, which is not enough time for the accident.

Therefore, from this aspect, we can clearly know that in fact, the property company does not have much responsibility, at most it will make compensation and visit the children as much as possible. <>

After all, this is different from the arson case in Zhejiang, there is no management loophole in the community, and it is not caused by the failure to repair and inspect the elevator in time. Therefore, everyone should distinguish the cause of the matter, and don't find trouble with the property at every turn, and the property is not easy.

Furthermore, this is not the responsibility of the elevator production company. If the boy is injured due to the failure of the elevator itself in the case of regular maintenance and inspection, then the elevator manufacturer is responsible. However, the fact is that this problem does not exist, so the liability of the manufacturer is immediately excluded.

This is not like the incident of jelly choking a child to death, jelly is the culprit in the jelly incident, but in this case, urine is the culprit. <>

We all know that if a minor commits a crime, or destroys public property, etc., and is not yet of legal age to be responsible, the guardian is responsible. The law applies to everyone, and it doesn't mean that because a boy has been harmed, he becomes a victim. After all, this is because of his negligence caused by a series of subsequent accidents, and there is no external coercion or mental problems, so parents should bear the greatest responsibility.

Compassion aside, the boy's parents are also responsible for the cost of repairs to the elevator damage. After all, you are the guardian, and you have not fulfilled your responsibilities. <>

Moreover, a boy at that age is not ignorant, and this looks like no education and no moral behavior. At first glance, it is usually very pampered at home, but it is not so educated, or it is also this kind of garbage person at home. I'm not falling into a trap, I just can't feel compassion for people who are killing themselves.

This kind of bear child raised by the bear family, when hindering others, may not let others blame, only when they endanger themselves know how to suffer, only to know that they are afraid.

So, I think the main responsibility lies with the parents of the children who urinated on the elevator. Moreover, I do not sympathize with him at all.

Recently, there was a urine stop elevator boy recovery incident, on the afternoon of August 3, Jinhua Yiwu 6-year-old boy Xiao Fang walked into a sightseeing elevator in Huangyuan Market, during the elevator operation, Xiao Fang peed on the control box under the control console, resulting in a violent vibration of the elevator, and then stagnated between the seventh and eighth floors, Xiao Fang climbed to the gap between the elevator car and the wall wall for the second time, he accidentally fell down the elevator shaft more than 30 meters high.

In this case, from a legal point of view, the child himself should bear full responsibility, Huangyuan Market does not bear any responsibility, the child fell into the elevator shaft of more than 30 meters, the reason why the elevator stalled and the child fell into the elevator shaft of more than 30 meters, the main reason is that the child peed on the control box under the control console, which caused the elevator to vibrate violently, and then stagnated between the seventh and eighth floors, the child fell into the elevator shaft of more than 30 meters, and the child's parents did not fulfill their guardianship obligations. Therefore, the bitter fruit of the child's accident is swallowed by the parents themselves, and all the costs are borne by themselves, and the Huangyuan Market does not bear any costs.

After this incident, as the guardian of the child, parents must take good care of the child, educate the child well, set an example, cultivate the child from an early age, and let the child have a sense of safety. In fact, in this matter, fortunately, the child's life is out of danger, and it is estimated that the child's parents will not go to the Huangyuan Market to ask for compensation. I wish the bear child an early **, the bear child is not in the bear!

The bear child is okay, which is a blessing in misfortune. The body has recovered, but I wonder if the trauma of his soul has recovered?

The boy's guardian should bear the primary responsibility for this incident. A six-year-old boy takes the elevator alone, even if there is no urine stop incident, there will be other hidden dangers, the movie "Dear" tells the story of a little boy who was abducted and trafficked to the countryside, if the child is lost, it will bring disaster to the whole family. How can parents feel comfortable letting a six-year-old take the elevator by himself?

Therefore, the guardian of the boy in this incident has an unshirkable responsibility.

It is understandable that the child is young and ignorant, and the parents' response to this incident has made many netizens dissatisfied. In fact, the root cause of the incident is that parents neglect their children's education, and parents have avoided talking about it so far...

I really want to ask the boy, "Didn't your mom tell you that bear children can't pee in the elevator?" Didn't your mom tell you that bear children can't ride the elevator alone?

Perhaps the boy's parents are too busy to tell their children these truths. Maybe because the boy is the fourth generation of the family, he is loved by his parents, and he is doted on by seven aunts, so he thinks that the child is still young, and there is no need to understand those big truths. In the end, the child's freewheeling almost made a big mistake, fortunately the child's body recovered, fortunately there were no other children in the elevator, the physical recovery is a blessing, we hope to see his family education can be restored.

This incident also highlights the importance of the mall being equipped with elevator operators. After all, no one wants this kind of tragedy to happen, once the elevator is scrapped early, the shopping mall will suffer heavy losses. Liability disputes after personal accidents are also a major pain point.

The child is fine, the parents' hanging hearts can be put down, and what we hope to see is that parents can stand up and admit their mistakes to the problem of the boy's urine ladder causing damage to the elevator. Use actions to teach children how to behave.

Of course, the child is not responsible, he peed only and fell on himself and did not fall on others, he peed too well, you see that he did scissorhands after he was cured, it means that he did a wise and great thing, everyone should not blame him, but should encourage him, continue to pee, life is endless, urine elevator is not stopped, until the last moment of life!

deserves it", "bear child", "lack of discipline" ......Accusations such as these have finally "searched" a new target. first stamped with the certification seal of "bear child", and then whipped it, it has become a habitual posture for many people outside of onlookers.

"Bear child: "You really can't take off your hat?"

I have to say that this incident is very reminiscent of another incident that happened in the elevator of a community in Changsha on July 3 - 2-year-old girl Lily and two children were in the same elevator, after reaching the 9th floor, all three children got out of the elevator, but one of the 5-year-old boys carried Lily back to the elevator, as a result, Lily was taken to the 18th floor by the elevator and walked out, unfortunately the 18th floor guardrail was damaged, no glass was installed, she fell from the 18th floor to the 2nd floor platform, unfortunately died.

At present, the "bear" of "bear child" seems to be gradually fading from its naughty and naughty original meaning and becoming synonymous with "evil".

In view of this, before labeling, people must at least clarify whether the child's "fault" and "crime" are "intentional evil" or "unintentional negligence"? Do they have the ability to anticipate the tragedy that a "hoax" might cause?

As the guardian of a minor, the child's parents failed to fulfill their duty of care, and the child was released from guardianship, resulting in a tragedy, and the parents should bear some responsibility. Now life is inseparable from the elevator every day, every day up and down the stairs to ride, the danger of the elevator exists from time to time, especially improper operation is more likely to cause accidents, it is best to do the elevator before the child to explain the risk of the elevator, and repeatedly emphasized, let the child develop a good habit of safety into the elevator.

The injured is not equal to the victim, on the contrary, parents should reflect on their own mistakes, otherwise there will be a next time for the bear child.

To be honest, whenever I hear someone advise me to "have a second child, and the two children can be companions", my heart is deeply angry. In my eyes, it is not difficult to give birth to children and support them, but with the development of the times, parents are more responsible for how to educate and shape them well. Otherwise, it is better to raise two bear children than to raise one child delicately and talentedly.

Just like the 6-year-old boy in the elevator incident, when the sightseeing elevator runs to the fifth floor, he pees on the elevator equipment operation control box in the lower right corner, after the urine enters the control box, the elevator button is all lit up, the elevator vibrates violently, and then stagnates between the seventh and eighth floors, and when he climbs to the gap between the elevator car and the wall wall for the second time, he accidentally falls down the elevator shaft more than 30 meters high. Although the boy has now returned to his former cheerful appearance, after the child has undergone this life and death test, whether his parents can thoroughly reflect on the issue of educating their children to prevent similar incidents from happening again is the key.

The Son does not teach the Father. 6-year-old children are incapacitated for civil conduct, so their daily behavior is not only due to the child's nature and instinct, but also more influenced by the original family. As the first teacher and guardian of the child, parents should guide the child correctly in their daily life, rather than allowing them to do something wrong.

Seemingly inconspicuous things, if not stopped or controlled in time, will make the child agree with the behavior from the heart. For example, the boy in the elevator incident, if his parents had regulated his behavior of urinating anywhere, the child would not have peed in the elevator, and the next tragedy would have been avoided.

At the same time, words are always more important than examples, and parents should also set an example in front of their children at all times, so that they can develop good habits and establish a correct outlook on life and values from an early age. Instead of waiting for children to cry and wipe their tears after an accident due to unruliness, it is better to strengthen education at ordinary times. Remember, there is nothing trivial about a child, and don't let bad behavior become a tragedy.

There is no doubt that parents have the primary responsibility, and if I am the property, I can pay you a visit. If you don't do it, you won't die.,Fortunately, it's just stopped at **.,If you fall, your life will be gone.。 From the fact that a 6-year-old child defecates in the open, it can be seen that the quality of parents is not high.

If there were other people on the elevator at the time, if the elevator didn't just stop running but fell or crashed to the top after being urinated, what would the other innocent victims do?

First of all, the elevator is operating normally without faults, and after accepting external factors (children peeing in the elevator, urine happens to flow to the circuit), which causes the elevator to malfunction, so an accident occurs.

Secondly, in more than 80% of the properties, the elevator is not manned, and even if the property owner immediately finds the problem, it cannot implement effective rescue. Aside from other things, from these two points alone, the property owner and the elevator factory do not bear the main responsibility.

Furthermore, people are naturally curious about things they have not been exposed to, and coupled with their young age, they have them"Bear child"word. As guardians, parents do not do their part"Guardianship"duties, and other factors that led to the tragedy. Parents should have the primary responsibility.

As a parent, it is not too much to spoil your children, but you should pay attention to ways and means to better cultivate your children. It seems to be accidental, but it is inevitable. Even without today's fall incident, other problems would have occurred. The focus is on the behavioural habits that the child has already developed.

The above is purely a personal opinion, don't spray if you don't like it. Thank you!