Badminton, is it ,,, reasonable to be disqualified?

Hello! I've seen similar issues online. Personally, I think it's the right thing to do. Due to the deliberate release of water by the two players, the first is to harm the fairness of the competition, and the second is to violate their sense of responsibility to the motherland.

However, the punishment given by the London Olympic Organizing Committee is really unbelievable and infuriating. I prefer the former because the players are Chinese veterans who are quite skilled and can easily defeat their opponents and win glory for China's gold medal. And they used negative methods to win medals unjustly.

Punishment is deserved. Your sentiment is right, but if the organizing committee is like this, won't the whole Olympics be a mess?

Hope you can.

It is also not possible to choose the strategy of playing, the rules are used by the people above, not by the players!

I also think it's unreasonable, but it's not supposed to be faked.

It's so unreasonable! This is a consequence that should not be borne by the players......

1. Serving height: When hitting the ball, the badminton hitting point is higher than the meter.

2. Illegal delay in serving.

3. When serving the ball, the club is not pointing downward.

4. When serving and picking the ball, it does not hit the bottom of the shuttlecock.

5. Out of bounds: The ball hits out of bounds and falls outside the effective area, without crossing the net or passing through the net or under the net into the opponent's court area.

6. Hitting the ball over the net: not hitting the ball in your own court, that is, the player's racket and body enter the opponent's court area.

7. Ball holding: Before hitting the ball, the ball is stalled on the racket, or there is a drag action.

8. Combo: The same player hits the ball more than 2 times in a row, or the player of the same team hits the ball continuously before the ball crosses the net.

9. Touching the net: The player's racket, body or clothing touching the net.

10. Obstructing the opponent's lawful strokes, or deliberately harassing the opposing player in other ways. Contains a weighing bucket.

11. The ball touches the wall of the object on the side of the court, such as the ceiling and electric light.

The behavior of these two players has seriously affected the order of the general environment of Chinese badminton, and at the same time has an impact on their team and themselves, I really don't know what these two players think, is it not good to play badminton obediently, and they have to embark on the road that affects their future.

Badminton has quietly been cautious or "faded" after Lin Dan, since the retirement of Lin Dan and other generals, the attention and achievements of badminton in China are indeed at a low ebb, and now the attention of badminton is up again, it is not a player who won the hot search, but was punished, or very serious, this does not directly seal their own back road, Chinese athletes Zhu Junhao and Zhang Binrong manipulated the game in the international competition in 2019 for personal gain, and were severely punished by the International Badminton Federation, Starting from August 13, 2021, Zhu Junhao and Zhang Binrong will be banned from participating in all badminton-related events and activities for two years.

These two athletes were originally potential new stars of the Chinese badminton team, and the better results are Zhu Junhao, who won the third place in the men's doubles of the National Badminton Championships, and the championship of the mixed team of the Asian Youth Championships. Even if you are strong, the coach may not let you play for the sake of the overall situation, and you will bury your career because of this, and you will suffer from other people's criticism in life, so why bother!

I hope that in the future sports, if there is such behavior, we must stop it in time, stop the loss in time, and give the public a healthy sports environment. I also hope that these two players can change their lives and continue to contribute to the national team!

These two athletes violated some regulations during the competition, and also did some particularly unreasonable things, so there is such a punishment, which is very correct.

It is very reasonable, because the two of them have violated the rules, so they should be punished accordingly, and then the effect of alerting the athletes can be achieved.

I don't think it's appropriate for something like that, because something like this has already had a big impact, and a lot of problems have arisen.

It was the right thing to do, because these two players broke the rules, so they were banned, and it was fair that they were punished like that.

Everyone is equal before the rules of conduct.

All persons are equal before the law.

Xinhuanet London, August 1 Olympic Special News (Reporter Ji Ye Bai Xu) In response to the negative competition turmoil in the badminton women's doubles match of the London Olympics on the evening of July 31, the World Badminton Federation told Xinhua News Agency reporters in the early morning of August 1 that a hearing will be held on the morning of August 1, and a decision will be made on whether to cancel the qualifications of negative players.

The spokesman of the Chinese sports delegation said that the Chinese sports delegation attaches great importance to what happened in the women's badminton doubles group stage, and the leaders of the delegation learned of the incident and immediately instructed the relevant responsible person to investigate the cause of the incident.

The Chinese Olympic Committee has always advocated the development of the Olympic spirit in sports competitions, the sportsmanship of fair and just competition, and opposes any acts and practices that violate the spirit of sportsmanship and sportsmanship for any reason or in any form.

The Chinese sports delegation will make corresponding handling based on the results of the investigation of this match.

There will be a result soon, maybe it won't be over, after all, what is a negative game is a vague definition in itself.

No... Preview details Please go to "Zhongsou" to see. The news is very complete.

There should be no penalties, and there should be individual players who play negatively.

There will be no ban, and there is no ban on the punishment of negative play in the rules.

Otherwise, Li Yongbo would not dare to do this.

In the negative game of Chinese badminton, Lin Dan deliberately lost, so that Bao Chunlai, Chen Jin and others could get more international points to rise to the international rankings, and appeared in the tournament to help Lin Dan eliminate his opponents, such a script has been staged many times. It's not that it can't be helped!

Everything comes according to the rules, there will be no bans.

There is no evidence for this, and the ambiguous thing is generally a warning and an appeal, and the ban should not be.

Probably not, just quit!

The London Olympics itself was a "big release," and some British people even ridiculed and spoofed the Olympics and London because they could not get a piece of the Olympic pie. Also, not to mention the national flagTM mess around, the national anthem is also played, so if you want to cancel the "negative" qualifications, then cancel these first!

I think the number one group in the world will go home. It doesn't matter, even if it's one less silver medal. The gold medal will not be lost.

1. The chief referee is fully responsible for the competition.

2. The on-site referee presides over a game and manages the venue and its surroundings. The referee is responsible to the chief referee; If there is no chief referee, he or she shall be responsible to the person in charge of the competition.

3. The serving referee is responsible for declaring the service violation (Rule 3).

4. The lineman is responsible for declaring the in-bounds or throw-in.

5. The referee shall maintain and enforce the "Badminton Competition Rules", and announce the "violation" or "re-serve" in a timely manner.

6. The referee shall make a ruling on the appeal before the next serve.

7. The referee should make the athletes and spectators understand the process of the game.

8. The referee may negotiate with the referee to arrange, or remove the lineman or the serving referee.

9. The referee cannot overturn the verdict of the lineman and the serving referee on the facts.

10. In the absence of on-site referees, referees should make arrangements for the duties that no one has to perform.

11. When a referee on the spot is unable to make a judgment, the referee shall perform his duties or "re-serve".

12. The referee has the right to suspend the game.

13. The referee shall record the relevant situation and report to the referee.

14. The referee shall submit all representations relating solely to the question of the Rules to the Chief Referee (such representations must be made by the player before the next serve; If at the end of a round, it should be raised before leaving the field).

Badminton players have been registered nationwide, and it will take a long time to be lifted.

I let you wait for a long time, and it can only be lifted after one year, and the validity period is one year. 【Detailed Rules for the Implementation of the Administrative Measures for the Registration and Exchange of Badminton Players (for Trial Implementation)】Article 11 Annual confirmation refers to the registration of registered athletes for the next year under the condition that the representative qualifications remain unchanged. If the registered unit Dan Chunsheng fails to go through the confirmation procedures for the athlete during the annual confirmation period, his representative qualification will be automatically terminated, and the athlete has the right to appeal to the Chinese Badminton Association and can choose a new registration unit independently.

Chapter 4 Registration and Review and Confirmation TimeArticle 21 The period from December 1 of each year to January 31 of the following year is the registration period and annual confirmation period for athletes.