-
Android's system is very entertaining and stable, and there is no Annoying certificate system in Symbian, so I highly recommend Android.
-
Android open source system operation, I believe that the open source will have the last laugh ......
-
Except for Android phones that don't play deeply, they've all been contacted! At present, the E72i, Symbian S60V3, is practical.
Symbian: Closed system, belongs to the embedded intelligent system, stable, safe, widely used, but will not be maintained or updated soon!
Android: The development system belongs to a more intelligent operating system, and the extended type is strong to say, a lot of software can be installed, more than Symbian's, but the security is poorer.
iOS: Closed system, belongs to a more intelligent operating system, the most playable game, the most extensive and creative software, belongs to the "game console", the cruise ability is similar to the Android large screen, the same day charge!
1.Nokia is a Santana, which is ugly but really durable.
2.BlackBerry is Volvo, wide and big but really safe.
3.Apple is Audi, there are no shortcomings and no changes.
4.Motorola is a Honda that has a classic but always bad car.
5.Samsung is a red flag, it's not practical and not good-looking, and I think it's awesome.
6.Siemens is a Hummer, a legend, but closed.
It's Geely, with a few letters, you think it's an international brand.
-
1.The Android system is open and can be produced by any manufacturer, and Symbian only has Nokia, so Android is highly selective. Android wins.
2.Most Android phones have a resolution of 480 800, with a maximum of 590 960, while Symbian goes up to 640 320, so visually. Android wins.
3.The Android system controls smoothly, I really miss Apple's iOS, and Symbian's control, I won't say much, you will understand when it crashes. Android wins.
4.Android due to the source ** open, the increase of software is rapid, and it involves a wide range, you think of it, you can't think of it, and Symbian is the end of the crossbow, it is impossible to have a greater breakthrough. Android wins.
I won't go into the rest of the details, the above four points can already prove how big the gap between them is.
-
The quality of the development of the smartphone system mainly depends on the amount of software supported Since the Android system is open source, 7 of the 10 software companies in Beijing are making Android software.
One of the most common causes of power consumption is that too much software is installed, which takes up too much memory on the phone, which reduces the available running memory of the newly installed software, and the operation is stuck and not smooth. The power consumption is fast, there are too many self-starting software, the software runs secretly in the background, occupying too much running memory, and the phone wastes a lot of power after running for a while. >>>More
Actually, you don't have to go to Saipan, you have to limit the number of time periods, go to the glutinous rice forum to try it, I used it well.
Symbian, stable, and white are its advantages. Android system, high configuration, smooth operation is the advantage. iOS system, too closed, and after jailbreaking, Apple's customer service is not guaranteed. But if you don't jailbreak, the software will have to run the Apple App Store**.
Judging from the interface released so far, the difference between Saipan 3 and Saipan 4 is not big in comparison, as for how big the gap is in the system, I don't know, and 12L Saipan 3 and 4 are not considered S60 Thank you. 3l If you compare the Symbian 3 and 4 like this, it is not appropriate, and the machine is not sold. >>>More
Not only Android Wear, but also Android Auto. Google's ambitions go beyond traditional mobile devices such as mobile phones. AndroidWear is mainly to complete Google's purpose of building an Android hardware ecosystem, but wearable devices can't run the whole Android, so Google will inevitably customize Androidwear. >>>More