Is a company that doesn t value academic qualifications a good company?

Whether you value academic qualifications or not is not an indicator to evaluate the quality of a company. A good company should first fulfill its social responsibilities, such as generating profits, paying taxes for the country, producing something or providing services that benefit the people, and finally providing employment opportunities for the people. Many recognized good companies look at academic qualifications, because only with a certain level of professionalism and learning ability can they be qualified for high-tech positions.

If a position needs to recruit a fresh graduate, the one with a higher academic background will definitely be preferred among the two inexperienced people, because the academic qualification can at least prove their learning ability and self-motivation, so they will be able to get started faster after arriving at the company. It is human nature to select the best, and it cannot be concluded that this company is not good.

Moreover, in general, large companies submit more resumes, and there are enough good schools, so in order to improve efficiency, it can only be one-size-fits-all, requiring a bachelor's degree or above.

In addition, some companies do not require academic qualifications for all positions, some positions have relatively low educational requirements, and some positions must reach a certain degree of education before they can be done.

So I have some advice for you when it comes to job hunting and academic qualifications:

1.You can start with a position with low educational requirements in large companies.

2.Find a potential small and medium-sized company to do the project, make your resume bullish, and then go to a large company to make up for the shortcomings in academic qualifications.

3.Have enough accumulation in the major, that is to say, save more work experience, and rich work experience can also make up for the shortcomings in academic qualifications.

4.For example, some people are not good at math, pull down the total score, and study in a very general school, but if you get a high score in TOEFL and think about it, you can also get more employment opportunities.

5.If you have the ability, you can start your own business, entrepreneurship does not depend on academic qualifications, as long as you have the ability to create a lot of wealth, so don't take academic qualifications too seriously, let alone judge that it is not a good company because some companies have set educational thresholds.

- Zheng Xiyue (ID: xiyue1612) original ---

It is difficult to judge whether a company that does not value academic qualifications is a good company, but a large company attaches great importance to academic qualifications. When many companies recruit, it is the threshold for undergraduate starts, and non-985 and 211 college graduates do not want it. After entering the company, the salaries of undergraduate and master's students are different, and the promotion and salary increase also depend on the academic qualifications.

A high degree at least proves that you have been a top student and have stronger self-control and willpower, which is important for career development. A low level of education means that you need to put in more effort to prove that ability is more important than academic qualifications.

Large companies that value academic qualifications are good companies, but good companies are not necessarily big companies. How do you judge a good company?

1. Judge whether it is conducive to your personal growth and development, and whether it is conducive to achieving your future career goals.

Second, whether the department you are staying in is an important department of the company, whether your position is an important position of the company, and whether the team is a master to take you forward.

Third, what is the development prospect of the company's industry, only if the company develops well, individuals can earn money. If you stay in the tuyere industry, you can basically eat meat, and even if you can't eat meat, you can still drink soup. In a downward industry, it is not easy to get soup.

Fourth, does the boss often pour chicken soup, draw pies, encourage employees to dedicate more, and promise a few years later? If so, go decisively, and fight for the immediate benefits.

5. Does the company have a clear promotion channel and a win-win platform for labor and management? If not, don't stay long and waste time, a good company will definitely have clear promotion criteria and promotion channels.

Therefore, judging whether a company is a good company is not based on the criterion of academic qualifications, but on the trade-off of many aspects. Personally, I still think that if I can improve my academic qualifications, I will try to improve it, the higher the better; If you can enter a big company, you can enter a big company, and the bigger the better.

I don't think a company that values academic qualifications can be called a good company.

Let me tell you a story first, which is the story of my friend. This friend of mine is studying medicine, and after being recommended by his mentor, he had the opportunity to submit his resume to a company. And, ladies and gentlemen, this company requires a university degree and English level 6.

According to this friend, after the initial examination, I interviewed several times for the interview alone, from HR to the department manager, and there were interviews and inspections layer by layer. It's a multinational company, you can say exceptional. <>

But my girlfriend works at Xingwang Ruijie in Fuzhou, which is our local company and a listed company. Her company's requirements for academic qualifications are quite strict, she said that all the people in the department have a college degree or above, and it is only a sales department, not to mention the educational requirements of the engineer department. She said that their company also needs a minimum job search degree to work as an operator, and with the popularization of higher education, many secondary school students have been slowly eliminated and new blood has begun to change.

After all, there are really very few things that people without academic qualifications can do. Too many professional things, or advanced things, must be done by those who have read books and have higher education. Of course, there may be many special positions that many companies do not require academic qualifications, such as sales.

But as I told in my first story, that friend was also in sales. It can be seen that good companies require academic qualifications, which is very simple, because people at that level must be able to do things.

Of course, there is another point that everyone in a good company is vying to get in, and if there is no restriction, then it is not HR busy. Therefore, many companies directly control those ineffective interviews, which is also a restriction on academic qualifications.

It can be seen that good companies have requirements for academic qualifications. So don't always feel that reading is useless, reading is the best way to change your fate.

<> a company that does not value academic qualifications may be a company that is not qualified to require other people's academic qualifications, or it may be a company that does not stick to one pattern and reduces talents. Generally, the former is the majority.

Because academic qualifications represent learning ability and basic physical and chemical level, at least there is no need to examine the most basic physical ability.

It's hard to imagine a good company that can hire people with no higher education for important positions.

Because with the current talent situation, there are many people with academic qualifications, and moreover, in the selection of people with academic qualifications, at least this person's learning ability can be proven.

Learning ability is the premise that a person can be very competent for his work, if you don't even look at the academic qualifications, it is difficult to prove whether the person has a good learning ability and has a basic level of intelligence.

Some companies advertise that they don't value academic qualifications, in fact, not necessarily because the company is a good company, but because he does not have a good selection ability, has a very strong selection ability, and very strong companies will value academic qualifications, and even require non-graduate students not to. It is a high requirement for academic qualifications, but it is not necessarily important to pay attention to the major.

Just like Country Garden has selected a lot of PhDs to do sales, their majors may not necessarily be marketing and sales majors, but because they have extraordinary intelligence, they can achieve very good academic qualifications in learning and have good results in research, so they will definitely have good ideas and breakthroughs in sales and marketing.

Education at least represents learning ability, at least represents a person's normal intelligence, no need to investigate, so a company that does not value academic qualifications may not be a good company, maybe in the future.

Companies that do not stick to one pattern and reduce talent often have basic requirements for academic qualifications.

It should be a good company, after all, such a company is really a particularly good opportunity for students who are not graduates of prestigious universities. Nowadays, no matter what kind of company, the first thing to look at is the academic qualifications of graduates. If you are a student at Tsinghua University and Peking University, then you have a good chance of being hired.

But if you're a regular school graduate, you're a spare tire. People will definitely have to think about it before admitting you. But if you come across a company like that, then I think it's going to be good.

And such a company gives everyone an equal opportunity, everyone does not have to look at their academic qualifications, fight for their own strength.

How to say, if every company doesn't look at academic qualifications, I think there will be more talents. This is just like in the old society, if more welfare was given to the peasants, it would definitely arouse their enthusiasm, so that the harvest would be more. After all, there are not as many graduates as ordinary school graduates, so the strength of the staff has gradually improved.

Try to analyze it:

Maybe it's because the company doesn't stick to one pattern of recruiting talent

Maybe the boss thinks that those with academic qualifications are not necessarily real talents, and those without academic qualifications are not necessarily talents, so they don't care much about him, and implement the mechanism of the capable and the weak. Or rather, it is a method of casting a wide net and carefully selecting. First bring everyone in, and then observe and select one by one.

Actually, there's nothing wrong with that. Because I have met many examples of junior college students who are much better than undergraduates, academic qualifications are sometimes not too reliable, and it still depends on the individual's way of doing things.

Of course, it may also be that the boss of the company does not have much of a goal, and it is good to make some money

The boss doesn't have big goals, he probably just wants to make a little money. I met a guy who was a farmer, and he had the opportunity to do bigger and make more money. But when someone suggested it, he said that he would be content to earn so much.

Not everyone aspires to be the world's first, and they can all be the world's first, and different patterns determine different employment choices. <>

Different industries have different requirements

Companies that mainly sell fast-moving consumer goods do not have a high level of general education; R&D-based companies, you can't play without academic qualifications; Ordinary counters and cashiers, there is nothing wrong with a secondary school degree; Hilton puts a secondary school student, then there may be a problem with the supervisor. Therefore, different industries have different requirements for academic qualifications, and it cannot be concluded that it is not good if leaders do not pay attention to it. As long as he can know people and do his job, and can keep the company running smoothly and keep moving forward, then his strategy is right and optimal.

In terms of things, I think it doesn't matter whether the leader attaches importance to academic qualifications or not, you have to consider himAttach importance to you or not,YouIs the industry in which it is located a growing and growing industry?。If it's all yes, then do it and don't overthink it.

When I first graduated, I entered a company like this, as long as I have a college degree or above, I can apply, and there is no limit to majors, but there are two rounds of written exams, and it is said that the pass rate is less than 5%, and the written test questions are all in English, and they are all logical analysis and engineering technology, etc., which is very difficult.

As long as the employees can create profits for the company...

Because they are afraid that these employees with too high education will look down on their company, and they may also use the company's platform to improve themselves.

It may be that because these companies operate in a very simple way and the work content is very simple, there is no need for employees with high academic qualifications.

It is because they feel that such people cannot be stunned, and they will disobey discipline, affecting the company's system and people's ability to work.

Academic qualifications are important, but it is more realistic that you still have to have strength, ** Of course, it is better to have academic qualifications and strength, but how many such people are there.

With the progress of society, people's simple knowledge background is becoming more and more homogeneous. Education and diplomas are no longer the primary conditions for companies to select employees. The first condition for many companies to look at employees is dedication, followed by professionalism.

The unit may fire capable employees, but for a loyal person, no leader will be willing to let the user go, and the user will become the longest-standing soldier in the iron camp of the unit, and it is the employee with the most development prospects.

Each of us wants to be able to find a better job, because when we can find a better job, it will eventually allow us to make better use of our strengths, and if we can find a better job, we will eventually be able to get more income and higher income, so that we can have a better life.

We know that if we want to find a better job, then we need to make ourselves better, because only if we are better. This will make it easier for us to find a good job.

So we see that many people are constantly working hard to improve their academic qualifications, because only when their academic qualifications are higher, so that they can get better jobs, so some people want to know whether you think you should insist on a high base salary if you have a high academic background?

Perhaps for a small number of people, they do think so. Because in the minds of these people. They feel that their education is so high, which fully shows that they are very good, and it is precisely because they are so good that they should of course have a higher base salary, if there is not such a large base salary.

Then I'm sorry for their high education.

But we actually know that it's actually for each of us. Although many of us hope that if we have a high education, we must have a good job, but in fact, we see that in reality, not everyone with a high education necessarily has a better job.

So, now we're seeing more and more people. They know very well, even if they have a high degree of education. They also need to work hard to improve themselves.

Because if they don't bother to improve themselves, then they may only end up with an ordinary basic salary, so if they want to be able to have a higher salary, then they still need to continue to work hard to improve themselves. In this way, you will eventually make yourself better. Only in this way will he finally be disgusted that Napi will be able to earn more income.