Does Idealism Believe in Heaven and Hell?

Materialism is divided into 2 types: metaphysical materialism and dialectical materialism.

There are 2 types of idealism: objective idealism and subjective idealism.

Materialism holds that there is no heaven or hell.

Idealism holds that there is heaven and hell. But there is a difference between the specific "haves".

Objective idealism holds that there is an objectively existent God who created the material world.

It's called: Spirit determines matter.

Heaven and hell, also created by God, are real.

Subjective idealism holds that

Man's mind, under the influence of ignorance, produces a delusion that the material world is real.

Subjective idealism, which acknowledges the existence of heaven and hell. But that's just that:

Under the influence of ignorance, there is an illusion.

It's like dreaming that people have arrived at a beautiful heaven or a terrible hell.

When I woke up from the dream, I found that there was no heaven or hell at all.

So, does heaven and hell really exist?

Subjective idealism holds that it exists in dreams.

It is not what materialism says, it does not exist at all, and it is not what objective idealism says, it really exists).

1. The division of materialism and idealism is meaningless, because to return to the essence, you can say that it can be anything, but it is just a pronoun, and has no substantive meaning;

2. Heaven makes people yearn for it, and hell makes people afraid, which can play a role in persuading people to be good;

3. It's all means, it's all methods, don't be obsessed with these concepts.

The worldview is a person's attitude towards the world, and idealism and materialism depend on the individual, which is the relationship between inclusion and inclusion. Let's study sophomore philosophy.

Islam believes in the resurrection of human beings after death, as well as in heaven and hell.

But the date of the resurrection is in the hands of the Creator, and Satan is a transliteration of the Hebrew word for "Sitanian," which is synonymous with demons.

Islam does not believe in Satan, but only believes that there is Satan, txh444 If you want to attack and slander Islam, there is no need to copy the traitor's article on this issue.

If it's a mythical heaven and hell, I don't believe it really exists, but there are places in the world that resemble heaven and hell, but there are people inside, not angels or ghosts.

I don't believe it, but I want you to believe it, and I can't help myself. Then you have a big weakness.

Idealism holds that there is heaven, and hell.

Materialism, on the other hand, holds that there is no heaven or hell.

Those who are satisfied with their present life are their paradise, and on the contrary, they are hell.

It is just a kind of thought of people before and after death, and there is no scientific basis.

I believe that my childhood was heaven, but now it is hell.

There is heaven and hell on earth.

Europeans believe in God's multi-lord idealism and they live well, and Chinese believe that Marxism-Leninism materialism is not also living well. You perceive that this thing exists, it exists, and you think that what you don't perceive doesn't exist, and you can think that what you don't perceive doesn't change significantly because you perceive or don't perceive it.

Idealism and materialism are two schools of thought in philosophy, or two theories, two methods of explaining the nature of the world, and there is actually no difference between who is better than the other. For example, if you think that tofu brain should be sweet and I think tofu brain should be salty, it is difficult to say which of us is better. Moreover, it is also wrong to think that all the philosophies in this world can be divided into either idealistic or materialistic.

Just as tofu brain can be sour or spicy, the view of the origin of the world, such as Descartes' dualism (the origin of the world is both material and conscious), cannot be classified.

Returning to the Lord's question, in our current social environment, it is generally believed that materialism is good and idealism is bad. This view was true in China a few decades ago, because it was a political necessity. Our party is a Marxist political party, and one of the important foundations of Marxism is materialism, so materialism is naturally good.

I think it's better to be idealistic and materialistic.

The things you see, the things you know, are cultivating this knowledge of you. So everybody is receiving different knowledge, and people rely on this understanding. But knowledge is also binding you, how can you say that the knowledge you use is the truth, and what you see is the truth?

The latter analogy is not very appropriate.

I will answer the four questions that hurt the corners of my mouth with that smile: First, a person doesn't even know the meaning of existence, whether this person is alive or not. Yes, the man is dead.

Some people are alive and dead, and some people are still alive after death, in the hearts of the people. Second, if you die, you will go there, and when you die, you will turn into ashes, and then you will become mud, and then you will become nourishment, and you will become grass, and you will feed the pigs ....... According to the law of immortality of matter, matter exists forever and does not end.

3. Is there really a heaven and a hell? This question has always been an irreconcilable contradiction between idealism and materialism. Idealism holds that when people die, good people go to heaven, and bad people go to hell.

This is the means of controlling people in feudal society. Materialism believes that there is no heaven and no hell, that everything is naturally formed, and that the rule of law is used to control people. In short, idealism or materialism.

Who has never been to heaven? Who hasn't been to hell? Let it be, there are those who believe, and those who do not believe.

Believe in science and respect nature. Is it really close to them? Say far away, a hundred years later, say near very close.

Except for suicide or death (suicide or death is generally not reborn,

It's about the difference between hell and heaven. The people in hell can only eat with a spoon, this spoon is a meter long, and they can only hold the end of the spoon, and no one in hell is very selfish, desperately sending the spoon to their mouths, but they often can't eat So they are very hungry and miserable. But the people in heaven are happy.

Everyone had a smile on their face.

What is the difference between heaven and hell? The people of hell want to eat, but they can't eat because the handle of the spoon is too long. In the animated short film "Heaven and Hell", the importance of collaboration is obvious.

The difference between heaven and hell is what happens to people in these two places.

There is selfishness in hell, so life is miserable. The fraternity in heaven is selfless, so it is very happy to live.

There is practically no difference between hell and heaven.

Hell is solipsism.

Heaven is idealism.

The world is materialistic.

Do you understand now?

One thought of goodness is in heaven, and one thought of evil goes to hell.

I don't like Jodo's answer very much! There is no need to say anything about idealism and materialism, if people's knowledge does not reach the realm of God's existence, it becomes idealism. Man is too small and too small for the whole universe, and materialism and idealism are only determined by people's narrow knowledge!

As long as people have faith, money worship is also a kind of faith, but it is too realistic, and it may cause spiritual deformity. The right faith is to raise one's spiritual level and change one's way of life. If you are too materialistic, it is not good, and if you are too idealistic, it is not good, and correct belief does not matter whether idealism or materialism.