What is the developer s response to the shrinking size of the house and the owner smashing the wall

Due to the "shrinkage" of the house, the owner sued the developer to return the corresponding area, and found someone to smash the wall shared with the neighbors. Yesterday, Mr. Liu, a neighbor, said that his house was just about to be rented out, and this smashed the matter was delayed, and he hoped that the perpetrator would compensate for the loss and apologize.

According to Mr. Liu, in 2017, he bought a square meter commercial house in Longyang Times Square, Hanyang District, located in Room 905, Block A, which is a loft type. Recently, the house has been vacant and Mr. Liu has reached a verbal agreement with someone to rent it out. On August 4, the property staff of the community suddenly told him that the landlord of room 906 next door with three workers was ready to smash the wall of his house.

It turned out that on the morning of the same day, Ms. Zhou, the owner of room 906, came to the property office and asked the staff to inform Mr. Liu that she was going to smash the common wall of the two rooms to make up for the missing area of her house. After that, Ms. Zhou led the workers upstairs. The property hurriedly contacted Mr. Liu and notified the security guard to go upstairs to stop the smashing of the wall.

By the time security arrived on the 9th floor, workers had already dug a hole in the wall. Mr. Liu then rushed to the scene and called 110 to call the police. When the police arrived at the scene, they admonished Ms. Zhou and told them that they could solve the problem through litigation, and Ms. Zhou promised on the spot not to dig the wall again.

But then the workers chiseled the wall again, and Mr. Liu called the police twice. In the end, the bathroom on the second floor of Mr. Liu's house was chiseled into a large hole about 50 centimeters wide, the vanity mirror and washbasin fell to the ground and were damaged, many wall tiles fell off, and some walls were damaged and cracked.

The reason why Ms. Zhou smashed the wall is related to the "shrinkage" of her house. Mr. Liu told the Chutian *** reporter that Ms. Zhou had approached him before, saying that the area on the second floor of her house was missing square meters, and this part of the area was allocated to Mr. Liu, asking him to return the area. Mr. Liu said that he had taken over the house in accordance with the procedures and had paid the corresponding purchase price to the developer, but did not agree to Ms. Zhou's request.

In this dispute, Ms. Zhou destroyed Mr. Liu's house due to lack of area, and both of them agreed on the housing area with the developer, but in practice, there was a dispute, and the developer should also bear some responsibility in the incident.

At present, the developer has not responded to the incident. Specifically, it should be necessary to wait for the responsibilities of the responsible party to be clearly defined before making a statement. This also reminds friends who buy a house to be vigilant when buying a house.

The developer has admitted to taking the treatment of more refund and less compensation according to the actual area, but the owner does not agree.

The reporter contacted the developer several times, but did not receive a response. The owner smashed the neighbor's wall, and the neighbor had the option of suing for damages.

At present, the developer has not made any positive response to this incident, and the specific response should be to wait for the relevant responsible parties to clarify the responsibilities before the developer responds.

Recently,Due to the "shrinkage" of the house, the owner, Ms. Zhou, sued the developer to return the corresponding area, but failed, and found someone to smash the wall shared with her neighbors。After receiving the notice of the property, Mr. Liu, a neighbor, rushed to stop it and also called the police, Ms. Zhou told the police that she would not smash it, but after the police left, she started to do it again. Eventually, a big hole was smashed in the wall, and the bathroom decoration of Mr. Liu's house was damaged.

Mr. Liu, a neighbor, said that his house was just about to be rented out, and the smashing delayed the matter, and he hoped that the perpetrator would compensate for the damage and apologize. He hoped that the other party would compensate and apologize to him.

Mr. Liu believes that Ms. Zhou is dissatisfied with the verdict and has the right to appeal, but she cannot take such drastic actions. Ms. Zhou's lawyer said that if Mr. Liu believes that his rights and interests have been violated, he can also sue Ms. Zhou for compensation.

The usable area of the house refers to the horizontal projection area of all the usable spaces in the sub-household (set) doors in the dwelling. Including bedrooms, living rooms and living rooms, kitchens, bathrooms, indoor walkways, stairs, closets, balconies, basements, false floors, mezzanines, attics (dark buildings) and other areas used in daily life. The usable area of the dwelling is calculated according to the horizontal projection line of the interior wall of the dwelling.

The thickness of the interior wall decoration is included in the usable area.

How to classify the area of the house.

1. Construction area: Now many of the houses we buy are in accordance with the construction area of the house, the construction area of the house mainly includes corridors, outdoor stairs, balconies, basements, etc., and has a permanent building with a cover, a firm structure, and a floor height of more than meters (including meters, the same below).

2. The usable area: the usable area of the house generally refers to the area that we can actually use, and these areas generally include the sum of the space area such as bedrooms, living rooms, kitchens, bathrooms, toilets, halls, corridors, storage rooms, wall cabinets, etc., and at the same time, the sum of the area of the stairs in the suite according to the number of natural floors is also included in the usable area.

3. The area in the suite: Although many houses are now carried out according to the construction area, there are also some houses that are sold according to the area of the suite, if calculated according to the area of the suite, it is more beneficial to the owner and the developer. The area within the house consists of:

The usable area of the suite, the area of the wall in the suite, and the floor area of the balcony.

4. Shared area: Generally, the houses purchased by buyers now have a shared area, and the shared area of the house includes a single garage, equipment layer or technical layer of more than one meter, indoor and outdoor stairs, stair cantilevered platforms, internal and external corridors, halls, elevators and machine rooms, door buckets, columned awnings, stairwells with enclosure structures on the protruding roof, water tank rooms, elevator machine rooms, etc.

How to calculate the usable area of the house.

The formula for calculating the usable area of the house is: building area - structural area - auxiliary area, that is to say, the area left by the construction area minus the area occupied by structural components such as concrete and brick masonry structures of the house, and then subtracted from the net area occupied by auxiliary buildings such as kitchens and bathrooms.

1. The area of the house is divided according to the function of use, which is generally divided into two types: direct use and indirect use, and the area of direct use is divided into internal use area and shared use area, and the indirect use area includes the use of walls, the area used by property and the use area of decoration.

2. The internal usable area in the direct usable area includes: master bedroom, second bedroom, baby room, toilet, utility room, living room, kitchen, dining room, fitness room and so on.

3. The shared area in the direct use area includes: buildings, elevators, power distribution rooms, garbage rooms, public areas, etc., which is the shared area used by each household according to the number of households in the same area divided by the area.

4. The indirect use area includes: the area of the wall is divided according to the common and exclusive use, half of the area of the common wall is included in the usable area of the house, and the area of the exclusive wall is included in the usable area.

The size of the house has shrunk and the owner smashes the wall of the neighborhoodThe developer is responsible。Due to the "shrinkage" of the house, the owner, Ms. Zhou, sued the developer for the return of the corresponding area, so she found someone to smash the wall shared with her neighbors. It's not right to smash the wall, but it's becauseThe developer did not take care of the matter properly, which led to such a result.

Zhang Shaowu, a lawyer at Guangdong Guangkai Law Firm, believes that Ms. Liang's neighbor Huang "can seek legal channels to solve the problem even if he is not satisfied with the court's decision." Huang's behavior violated Liang's rights, and Ms. Liang could demand that Huang restore the original state, compensate for losses, apologize, etc., and even claim moral compensation. In addition, Huang's conduct is suspected of constituting the crime of intentional destruction of property or the crime of illegal invasion of residence."

If this involves violating the law, the area of the house has shrunk, you can complain to the relevant departments and sue the developer, but you can't change the wall without permission, and it is illegal to change the wall without permission!

It is certainly illegal for the owner to do so. First of all, this wall is not only the owner's, but also the other owner's.

Yes, the owner's actions are definitely illegal. He should be held accountable to the property, not by smashing the neighbor's wall.

This is, of course, illegal. After all, it violated someone else's property. If the size of the house is shrinking, you should find a developer. The neighbor is not at fault in this matter and should not take his anger out on others. In the end, he compensated his wife and his soldiers, and compensated for the losses of others.

But if you want to increase the size of the house by destroying the common walls with your neighbors, it is a bit of a stretch, because the common walls do not belong to you alone, and if you destroy these walls without permission, it is likely to pose a great threat to the safety of the whole house. So in any case, this is definitely very undesirable, and if you destroy these walls with load-bearing walls, in the future, if there is an accident, it is not only the neighbors who will be harmed, but also ourselves.

Because he thought that the court's decision was unreasonable, he did it at the same time as filing an appeal, and of course he did not solve the problem, which had nothing to do with the neighbors at all.

Because the owner found that the house was missing two square meters after getting the house, the owner sued the developer to return the corresponding area, and found someone to smash the wall shared with the neighbors. This will certainly not solve the problem, and we need to use the law to protect our rights and interests.

Because she doesn't accept the developer's refund, she just wants to get back the area that should belong to her neighbor's house. This can't solve the problem, the area is more or less is written in the contract, the developer compensates according to the contract, and the neighbor's house is renovated, and she has to compensate the neighbor for the loss if she smashes it, and the gain outweighs the loss.

This will not solve the problem. It is not the right way to smash the wall of the neighbor's house when the house shrinks, it will deepen the conflict between the neighbors, and the correct way to do it should be to give feedback to the property and wait for the property to solve the problem.

In addition, Mr. Liu also claimed that the other party had smashed the wall without authorization, which had affected the rental of his house, and he was the victim; But Ms. Zhou also has her own reasons: "For several years, I have been paying him the property fee and mortgage for the extra area, and I am the victim."

In my opinion, it is indeed wrong for Ms. Zhou to smash the wall without authorization, but Mr. Liu knew that he occupied more of the other party's area when he took over the house, but did not negotiate, but directly paid the purchase price, which is obviously inappropriate, but the biggest responsibility is obviously the developer.

Because the owner had approached the developer before, the developer did not give the owner a satisfactory answer, so she smashed the wall of her neighbor to make things bigger.

She thought that the extra two square meters of her neighbor were her own area, and the developer compensated her 10,000 yuan after court mediation, but she did not agree, and she lost her mind and smashed the neighbor's house.

The owner sued the developer for the return of the corresponding area without compensation, and even asked the workers to smash the wall that his house shared with his neighbors. He said that the area on the second floor of his house was missing square meters, and this part of the area was allocated to the neighbor, and the neighbor asked the neighbor to return the square meter.

You've probably heard such a story. In the past, two families fought to the death for a place of three meters. But the son of the other family said that it didn't matter if he was three meters?

So their family gave up three meters, and the other family saw that their family gave up three meters, and felt ashamed, and at the same time gave up a distance of three meters, so there was a six-foot alley between the two families, which is the so-called six-foot alley. This story is widely circulated for everyone, and the meaning is that the two families are humble to each other, and they have not hurt their harmony, and such behavior is worth learning and imitating for future generations. <>

But what happened recently has not been so congenial. The general story of waking up is that a woman who buys a new house finds that her shared area is not as large as her house, or even a little smaller, which makes him very angry. So he actively contacted the relevant company, property and other departments.

I would like to ask what kind of deviation this question has. But unfortunate things happened, and all the places he would ask did not give him a correct answer, and even shirked responsibility, which made the lady very angry. So he hired someone to smash his wall in order to expand his shared area and maintain the same usable area as the one on the house use certificate.

As soon as this incident came out, it caused heated discussions among netizens, and some people's attitudes towards this matter were diametrically opposed. Some people think that the woman's behavior is too extreme, but in fact, a goal can be achieved through reasonable and legal means. There is no need to do such laborious things, and the final result may not be so satisfactory, so they said to the woman.

I don't support it, I don't understand it, and I even think it's a bit excessive. But there is another group of netizens who said that the lady's approach is completely correct, which just serves as a wake-up call to those unscrupulous businessmen to occupy the shared area without reason. We go to the extent that our property allows us to purchase the usable area of the house we want.

Our approach is completely reasonable, in accordance with the rules of the use of the house, and at the same time, the relevant agreements have been signed and have the force of law. However, there was no negotiation on the housing side as we wanted, or the correct size. And they are also escaping responsibility, and there is no way to empathize or understand such behavior on anyone.

So, what kind of approach to what kind of people. This woman's approach can be greatly recognized by some netizens. <>

In fact, on this issue, I hope that the relevant departments can increase law enforcement efforts and solve this problem as soon as possible. And I hope that if you encounter related things in the future, the corresponding department should be able to exert its own strength to deal with such things, you know, your attitude directly affects the mood of the owner. At the same time, I hope that the woman's behavior does not disrupt the surrounding environment or the normal life of other neighbors, and try not to cause more trouble to others.