Which is better Fiesta hatchback Suzuki Swift BYD F3R?

BYD F3R is better, the Swift has thin skin, the door does not have anti-collision steel beams, the Swift's braking foot feel is not good, the brakes are too soft, and the safety factor is very small. The engine used on the Swift has been very backward, the power is insufficient, and the noise is very high, the Swift takes a small and exquisite route, but the space is too small, only suitable for travel, not suitable for home use, the wheelbase of the carnival hatchback is 2490mm, the space is small, the fuel consumption is 9L, very high, the interior workmanship is rough, the configuration is uneven, many basic configurations need to increase the price of tens of thousands of yuan to get, low cost performance, BYD F3R has a fashionable appearance, large space, F3R uses a BYD473QB engine, This engine is also used in F3, with strong power, high configuration, and fuel consumption, which is very fuel-efficient, affordable, and very cost-effective.

Fiesta, the latter two cars are too low-grade. The handling is not good, I am the owner of the carnival, I have driven an F3 before, and my colleagues from Suzuki have it, but it feels a lot worse than the carnival.

To understand your own needs, carnival is very suitable for young people with strong dynamics, Suzuki is not suitable for tall people, and F3R is cost-effective to support independent cards.

Suzuki Swift from vehicle performance. Impetus. Disposition. Fuel. The driving comfort is far better than that of BYD and Fiesta.

If it were me, I'd choose the Swift.

Carnival, American cars are still better than Chinese cars.

BYD's cost-effective ratio.

Suzuki Swift: Advantages: The seat is very comfortable, the configuration is very complete, the details are good, the disadvantages are good, the vehicle interior has protrusions, the rear door seam is slightly larger, the engine and steering machine are abnormal.

Ford Fiesta: Advantages: beautiful appearance design, dynamic and beautiful • Low fuel consumption, low cost of use • Good driving performance, flexible handling.

Disadvantages: The interior space is slightly cramped • Interior material, average workmanship • Average comfort and loud noise.

In terms of quality, I trust Ford, it must be a century-old enterprise (the world's first car was produced by Ford), and the Swift style is a bit stingy, not as generous as a carnival.

There are many outlets in the country, so don't worry!

I think that the new carnival has not yet been listed, and even if it is listed, it has yet to be tested by the market, so it can basically be excluded, the Swift is smaller in comparison, and the configuration is more general, so it can also be excluded, I think the first Fit is better, because the power is very sufficient, the fuel consumption is low, the appearance is also very beautiful, the handling is better, the configuration is relatively complete, the ride is also very comfortable, and the cost performance is extremely high.

Carnival is beautiful and fashionable However, I heard that the Swift still uses the old engine, and the carnival performs well in terms of power, ** and fuel consumption are higher than the Swift, and the two cars are not a grade that is not easy to compare. Personally recommend Carnival.

New Fiesta, nice car. There are no minor problems, but it is comparable to Japanese cars, and the safety is much better than that of Japanese cars.

The Suzuki is more fuel-efficient and the Ford is stronger.