With legal analysis, today s saying that the kindergarten wolf is coming

In the morning, I watched CCTV's "Today's Statement". Approximate content: A prisoner who should be sentenced to death, his family actively raised funds to compensate the victim 30,000 yuan. The convict was sentenced to a suspended death sentence. What I care about is what the guest has to say.

The common people think that it is 30,000 = commutation of sentence, and you can buy your life with money. Newspapers, ** hot discussions. I think that the law can be traded, and I am very critical. On the contrary, the judge in charge of the case and the guest of "Today's Statement" believes that it is okay and understandable.

I was quite emotional in my heart, and I vomited it quickly.

A crime punishable by death will not be a trivial matter! If it is not intentional, it is also reckless and unscrupulous, causing a catastrophe. If the offender did it intentionally.

It shows that the prisoner's heart has been greatly broken. The guest of "Today's Statement" said: The rights and interests of prisoners should also be considered.

To establish a guilty person is to be deprived of rights. What do you think about the rights of victims?

30,000 = commutation of sentence, which the judge and guests denied. Or is it the deliberate hype of the newspaper that makes them very uncomfortable. The author thinks it is:

30,000 = Commutation of sentence. paid 30,000 yuan, and the sentence was changed to a suspended death, this is how things are done, how can you deny it. Say that this is to buy life with money, what do you have to deny?

The prisoner's mother said, "I don't deserve to be sentenced, and I won't pay for it." Isn't this an obvious transaction of money and law?

The prisoner's family thinks so, why can't the people think so, and why is it wrong?

The judge and the guests believed that the prisoner and the victim could negotiate a settlement. Many times, the prisoner is stronger, much stronger than the victim. The outcome of the negotiation will cause the victim to suffer more and more harm. Negotiations between the two opposing sides must be advantageous and powerful.

The guest of "Today's Statement" also said: Negotiate compensation and not ask for sky-high prices. I don't know what the sky-high asking price is.

If someone cuts off a hand by you, will you pay 50,000, 100,000, or 200,000? If your heart is greatly broken and you don't talk about it, you will have to lose the money that you can earn in a lifetime with one hand, and you will also have to pay for mental damages and so on. The victim was not touched.

Why don't you chop off one of your hands? The law has its own fair way to deal with it, so how can people negotiate a settlement?

Dear judge, if your child has a hand cut off and wants you to negotiate a settlement, you can only borrow 50,000 yuan from everywhere, you don't want to pursue criminal responsibility, right? The author thinks it is impossible, absolutely impossible.

It's important to empathize and solve problems. Many unfair managers in society are responsible, those who raise knives to children, you are wrong, look at those ** kindergarten children, how cute they are in the spring!!

Civil can be negotiated. How can criminal cases be negotiated? Criminal offenses must be held criminally responsible. Otherwise, where is fairness and justice?

Killing people to pay off debts and paying off money is justified. The punishment is abstinence, and it is not necessary to consider the feelings of the abuser. Those who take the initiative to harm others must be made to pay a terrible price.

Let it get ten times the pain of the victim. Or what kind of punishment will there be? Those who commit adultery can easily pass the test, it is not painful, and they will come to commit it, and they are used to it.

Anything that is deliberately for, expectation: to return the other way, to expect, to expect.

The suspect is an ordinary worker in a local state-owned steel plant, and he has always had conflicts with his parents, in order to prove his ability to his parents, and also to let his wife and children live a good life as soon as possible. The idea of using an oxygen cutter to cut ATM savings rooms was born. But the general oxygen cutter is bulky and not easy to carry, so he ordered a new cutter online in Shenzhen that specializes in the production of portable oxygen cutters.

His first crime was to cut the CCB ATM next to a kindergarten, but he was unsuccessful, the security door was too strong so he gave up, and his crime was also filmed by the kindergarten's camera (only his back was filmed). Then he hid for a year, and when he saw that there was no news, he committed the crime again. This time, he chose the Bank of China ATM at the entrance of a unit.

But on the way to cut, he was found by the guard on duty, in order to avoid exposure, he stabbed the doorman to death with a knife, during the fight, the doorman shouted loudly to the duty room (there is also a doorman), after killing the first doorman, he rushed in and stabbed the second doorman who was coming out to check, and then he packed up the tools of the crime and fled the scene of the crime. **After a lot of painstaking and meticulous analysis work, the kindergarten attempt case and this case were investigated together, and then started from the crime process filmed in the kindergarten camera, and the portable oxygen cutting machine used by the suspect in the picture was used as a breakthrough point, and the manufacturer in Shenzhen was contacted, and then the consignee was found from the delivery record. In the end, the suspect was targeted and arrested.

In this way, you pay attention to **12, the "Law Lecture" at 18:55 in the evening, I read it every day, and I record it.

This show is very well organized. There are cases, and they are all close to life events and teach you how to solve them.

A while ago, Wang Dawei, a professor at the Public Security University, gave a very good lecture on the "Public Security Administration Punishment Law." In particular, there is a lesson on how to deal with forced begging and about difficulties in finding the police.

I suggest you check it out.

I think it's more than what "Today's Statement" says.

Regarding the after-view of the focus interview, it should be 290 words 310 words (a symbol is also a word.)