Compassion does not lead soldiers, righteousness does not raise wealth? Is it true?

Compassion does not lead soldiers, righteousness does not raise wealth" There is some truth in this sentence.

In an environment where the law of the jungle is the strongest, competition is extremely brutal. To survive or to perish, this is a question that those who are in it need to think about from time to time. In the face of the enemy, if you are too merciful, it is easy to be taken advantage of by the enemy and kill yourself and your subordinates;

In the face of your subordinates, even if they make mistakes and violate your rules, you are still too kind, and it is difficult for you to establish your prestige and command them like an arm.

The ruthlessness of management is for efficiency, that is to say, the "unkindness" to subordinates is actually the "kindness" to the team. In order to survive, in order to achieve victory, it is very necessary to have a proper "unkindness".

The righteous are happy to help others. Helping others, in general, means that the helper consumes money, rather than taking money from the helped, so people say "righteousness does not support wealth".

In an environment where the law of the jungle is the strongest, competition is extremely brutal. To survive or to perish, this is a question that those who are in it need to think about from time to time. In the face of the enemy, if you are too merciful, it is easy to be taken advantage of by the enemy and kill yourself and your subordinates; In the face of your subordinates, even if they make mistakes and violate your rules, you are still too kind, and it is difficult for you to establish your prestige and command them like an arm.

The ruthlessness of management is for efficiency, that is to say, the "unkindness" to subordinates is actually the "kindness" to the team. In order to survive, in order to achieve victory, it is very necessary to have a proper "unkindness".

The righteous are happy to help others. Helping others, in general, means that the helper consumes money, rather than taking money from the helped, so people say "righteousness does not support wealth". But this is not absolute.

If "righteousness" can bring you fame and therefore more opportunities to cooperate with others, then "righteousness" can actually help to generate wealth. When you have more money, you can use some of it to help more people. Thus entering a virtuous circle.

Whether it is true or false depends on whether you have a wise heart, and whether you have compassion for unkindness and great kindness, and righteousness for unrighteous things and righteousness.

Of course it's true, it goes without saying.

There is some truth, but it is not an absolute truth. It is necessary to analyze the situation on a case-by-case basis.

Compassion does not lead soldiers, righteousness does not raise wealth This sentence comes from Chen Wuliang's "Shilin Guangji: Warning Maxims" in the Song Dynasty The original sentence is "Righteousness does not lead wealth, mercy does not lead soldiers" It means that people with compassion are not suitable for leading soldiers, and people who are too benevolent and righteous are not suitable for taking charge of money.

The meaning of this sentence is that benevolent people cannot lead the army, and people who speak righteousness cannot make money, and the source is a famous saying in "Chen Shouting Loves to Listen to Books".

The meaning of this sentence is that if a person is soft-hearted, he is not suitable to be in charge of the army, and if he is willing, he is not suitable to be a manager of financial power.

The meaning of this sentence is that people with great compassion are not suitable for leading the army, they will delay major events, and people who are very righteous are not suitable for managing money, because they can't keep it, mainly because of the famous sayings of the ancients, which are very good.

The meaning of this sentence is that a compassionate person is not suitable to lead troops into war, and a person who does not speak of morality cannot have a financial intersection with him, and the source is handed down from ancient times.

In ancient times, competition was fierce, and if the general was too merciful and always soft on the enemy, it would be difficult to win the battle, and in the same way, if a person was too righteous, it would be difficult to become a rich man.

Under certain conditions, within the scope of ability. And with the ability, we must know how to repay the kindness, do not forget to dig the well, and we must do good deeds and accumulate virtue.

As the name suggests, it means that a person with a charitable heart cannot lead troops to fight, and even if he does bring troops, he will only suffer defeat. Righteousness does not support wealth means that if you are too righteous and unprincipled, it will be difficult to make money in business. Compassion does not lead soldiers and does not raise wealth, that is, to your subordinates, because your relationship is a subordinate relationship in the position, there is no who pays and sacrifices for whom, employees are employees, supervisors are supervisors, the country has a hierarchical organization, and the enterprise also has a personnel structure, and everyone is established by responsibility in each individual in the company's economic structure.

In the company, the judging criteria are divided through the post process, that is, we often say that the post is suitable for the person, rather than the person is fixed. This rule was called "rite" by the ancients.

A benevolent person is not a good material for leading troops, only a person who can ignore life and death and use soldiers is a good commander, and this is also the case as a businessman, if you are too benevolent, you will suffer a big loss in business.

It means that the management of the army should be strict, and only by training soldiers assiduously can they have combat strength, and that the management of funds should be open and transparent, and no small actions should be made.

A soft-hearted person should not lead troops, and a person who can do business should always think of his own interests.