How much is the difference between Canon 70D and 60D and Nikon 7000 which is more affordable?

Canon EOS 70D is an upgrade of EOS 60D, 70D seems to have just been launched in 13 years, 60D is an 18-million-pixel APS-C format CMOS, DigiC 4 processing engine, 70D is a 20.2 million pixel APS-C format CMOS, equipped with an all-pixel dual-core CMOS processing engine is DigiC 5+

I recommend that you consider buying a 70d after it has stabilized. Especially if you rely heavily on Live View, or prefer to shoot with a DSLR camera**, then 70D is a better option than 60D.

If you're using an eye-level viewfinder, the so-called all-pixel dual-core CMOS AF has nothing to do with you. As long as you can accept the 60D focusing system, then the 60D is still a cost-effective camera.

Nikon. Good value for money. The positioning is a little higher than that of the C family.

Because people who take pictures of scenery like to travel, I think it's better to use Nikon's D7000+16-85VR when traveling. Or 18-200VR, one lens will do the trick for you. As for why Nikon is recommended, compare it yourself, in the outdoors, the quality of the body is more important.

Of course, if you mainly want to make money with **, then I think you should go to Nikon D700 or above full-frame with 14-24VR. But then again, it feels like there isn't much of a difference between shooting landscape Nikon lenses at the best resolution. In a word, don't get caught up in the equipment pie.

If you're on a budget, be sure to get on the D7200

The evaluation data has come out, and the latitude of the D7200 has been completely destroyed by all DSLRs except for the D810, yes, all SLRs, and the vast majority of full-frame cameras including 5D3.

It seems that the D7200 has not improved substantially, but thanks to Nikon's replacement of its sensor, the D7200 has made a qualitative leap in image quality, making it the most powerful APS format SLR to date, and none of them (better than the 7D2 with higher positioning).

The excellent latitude is a great help for landscape shooting, giving a lot of room for post-processing and more conducive to creation.

In terms of image quality, D7200 surpasses 70D in an all-round way, and there is no suspense.

Of course, 7200 is more expensive now, if you are not in a hurry, you can wait a few months for him to stabilize.

Now70D can only be said to be very cost-effective now,7200After having WiFi,The functionality of the two is almost the same(D7200For the sake of body strength, there is still no flip screen,This70D is more convenient)

Finally, now 7200 is a lot more expensive than 70d, and it has caught up with the entry full frame, if the budget is insufficient, and you don't often shoot landscapes, mainly for home, 70d is actually enough.

The two cameras are about the same, both belong to the mid-range SLR.

When you just enter the SLR, you need to carefully consider which brand to use, because the lenses of each brand are different, and the lenses cannot be used universally, why do I mention the lenses here? Because the most important thing for a DSLR camera is the lens, which is much more important than the body.

1.According to the general point of view, the advanced lens is better for Nikon's zoom, Canon's prime is better, and Canon's premium lens is slightly cheaper than Nikon's premium lens. (at this stage).

2.In terms of the fuselage, Nikon's fuselage design is a professional idea, Canon's design is a concise idea, Canon's electronic ability is slightly stronger, and Nikon is slightly stronger in terms of reliability.

3.Japanese manufacturers are very smart, and they generally compete in a misplaced position, what does this mean? The 60d and d7000 you mentioned are the same level, but the d7000 is stronger than the 60d.

The two manufacturers will not produce two machines with exactly the same indicators to compete with each other, which is the clever point of the Japanese company.

Summary:If it is a general hobby and home use, choose 60D is good, but the lens is not recommended 17-40, 17-40 is a full-frame ultra-wide-angle lens, to 60D becomes a standard zoom lens, in fact, this is a loss of the overall strength of this lens, 60D The first lens is recommended to choose 15-85 IS, the focal length is relatively perfect, designed for small image factories, and the imaging is also very good. Then equip a prime lens, because prime lenses can get a higher **quality, 50 or 85 is recommended.

Choose Nikon D7000, I don't recommend it very much, because D7000's ** is not as good as choosing D300S, the professionalism is better, if you want to make a breakthrough in photography, or you will love it more, it is recommended that you choose D300S directly, the first lens with 16-85VR or 17-55 is good.

If all your budget is just the money you mentioned for one lens for one body, and you are not ready to invest any more money to buy lenses in the future, it is recommended that you choose the Pentax brand, the K7 is now cost-effective, and the performance is no worse than the D7000 and 60D.

Finally, tripod flashes, are all necessary to equip, even necessary, and it is recommended that landlords keep this budget.

It's all hand-beaten)

If you're disappointed, buy a Canon, and those who play Nikon will only compare the Nikon brand models, especially the kind of photographers who have a bunch of Nikon heads on their hands.

It seems that you want to enter the SLR for the first time, and this path must be chosen, and it is difficult to change the school when you walk in.

If it's just fun, let's go to Pentax...

The 60D is a little bigger than the D7000, and the personal feeling is still better than the D7000, after all, the 60D is plastic and the D7000 is partially metal and plastic;

The white balance effect of the shoulder screen is not very large;

Whether it's Canon or Nikon, in fact, it has to come later, of course, Nikon can hang the curve, I don't know if the D7000 can hang or not, it can make up for the problems in the later stage.

D7000 is more than 30 points of focus, 60D I think it is 9 points, or it may not be clear that it is 11 points, anyway, it is really not as good as D7000.

However, if I am asked to choose, I recommend D7000, but ** may be more expensive, if it is not suitable, 60D is also a very good choice.

are ready to come out of the D7000, it is better to go directly to Pentax K5, all-metal body, Pentax mid-range flagship! Almost all of these tests surpassed the D7000 and 60D

Of course, into D7000, 60D? It seems to be a little bit higher than the D90. There is still a gap with the D7000. It's not 50d after all