Questions about citations to medical reviews

Ah, I want to know, it's really big.

First, enter the place where you want to add references;

2. "Insert" in the menu - Quote "- Footnote.

and endnotes"; 3. After confirmation, a superscript "1" is inserted in the place, and the cursor automatically jumps to the end of the article, which is preceded by a superscript "1", which is where the first reference is entered, repeat the above steps, and add other references. Fourth, modify the style to [1] [2], in the full text, find (ctrl+f) - advanced - special characters.

Endnote marker (it will automatically display e) - Replace with [ &Note: Move the cursor to the first marker, i.e. 1, and then find and replace.

1.Delete a dash in front of the reference.

2.Switch to normal view, in the menu "View" - normal "- Footnote" - the column of the endnote;

5. In the drop-down menu on the right side of the endnote, select "Endnote separator", then the dash appears, select it, and delete it. Then select "Endnote Continuation Separator" in the drop-down menu, this is the long dash filial piety message appeared, select it, delete. Che Qiaoming changed back to the page view, and it was done.

The annotation method of literature review and citation is as follows. ：

References are generally annotated at the end of the cited text by clicking to insert) citation--footnotes and endnotes, select endnotes, references should belong to endnotes, select "insert --- cited footnotes and endnotes ---" in the menu, footnotes are notes under a certain page of the article, and endnotes are at the end of the article, and you can select the encoding after opening, that is, the corner code.

<> enter [1] in the state of English input method, and select [1].Press Ctrl+Shift++ to place the cursor where the reference is cited, and select "Insert|" on the menu barFootnotes and endnotes", select "Endnotes" in the pop-up dialog box, click the "Options" button to modify the numbering format to Arabic numerals, and the position is "the end of the document", after confirmation, word inserts the number of the reference in the cursor, and automatically jumps to the corresponding number at the end of the document, please type in the description of the reference Wang Defeat, and add the corresponding literature here according to the format of the reference bibliography.

Yes, I copied it from a lot of sources. Just handed over in the morning.

Compared with the content of the literature review, my tutor paid more attention to our formatting and layout.

Footnotes, not references.

**Introduction to the detection system Modify cheats method.

Click on my name to see the space this.

The number of citations in a literature review usually depends on its purpose and field.

Generally speaking, the number of articles in the review should be more than 20-30, but this number will be affected by the research background of the topic you want to **. If your literature review is up-to-date, you can cite more literature, such as 50-70 papers, within a reasonable range, so that you can better cover more research areas.

If your literature review is more inclined to be comprehensive and in-depth on a particular topic, then you need to cite more literature to reach more than 100 articles in order to better understand the topic.

Some scientific research can omit references, but literature reviews must not be omitted, and should be cited in the text, can reflect the whole picture of the topic, and is the literature that the author has directly read.

The downstairs is correct, and if you cite it without writing a reference, it may be considered plagiarism. In addition, if you cite a lot of literature and the quality is high, it means that your review is good.

If you cite it, you should put it in the references.

Literature reviews need to be cited.

The literature review needs to contain all the references written under your own review, and all of them are marked and cited, but it cannot be all the literature, because it is impossible to find all the literature, and it is impossible to write all the literature in a literature review more thoroughly.

The literature is not a review, that is, the results obtained through a large number of audited literature, first list other people's literature one by one, and then reflect their own views, summarize and summarize, if the content of the literature review contains the literature that they have participated in.

Literature review: Literature review is referred to as review, which is an academic ** that collects a large number of relevant information on a topic, problem or research topic in a certain field, a certain specialty or a certain aspect, and makes a comprehensive introduction and elaboration by analyzing, reading, sorting out and refining the latest progress, academic opinions or suggestions of the current topic, problem or research topic.

Requirements for writing a literature review:

1) Get straight to the point and don't go around the bush.

Avoid talking about the historical origins and the research process of the topic at length.

2) Be concise and focused.

It should not be too much about the common knowledge content that is well known to peers and textbooks, and when it is necessary to mention the research results and rationale of others, it is sufficient to mark it in the form of reference quotations. When prompting the work and ideas of the article in the introduction, the meaning should be clear and the language should be concise.

3) Review history with a focus.

The content should be closely related to the title of the article, introduce the background around the title, and summarize it in a few sentences; When prompting the method used, it is not required to write the method, the result, and do not discuss it; Although it is appropriate to cite the content of past literature, it is not necessary to list them at length, and the preface should not be written as a historical development of the research.

Do not write the preface as a literature review, let alone repeat the common sense content that is already in the textbook or known to researchers in the field.

4) Respect science and seek truth from facts.

In the preface, the value of the evaluation should be appropriate, seek truth from facts, and the words should be scientific, and it is best not to use inappropriate self-comments such as "this research is the first and first reported in China", "it fills the gap in China", "has high academic value", "the content of this research has not been reported in China" or "this research is at the leading level at home and abroad".

5) The content of the introduction should not be the same as the abstract.

Pay attention not to use polite words, such as "only a little learned", "limited level", "please correct", "throwing bricks and leading jade" and other language; It is better not to discuss the preface in paragraphs, without illustrations, lists, or derivation and proof of formulas.