-
Take the initiative to report the case, if he wants money, let him go to the court to sue you, and he won't lose a few dollars, but he will delay a lot of time, so he will count it less, and give 300 is enough.
-
If you want to pay, you can, you can ask him to bring an invoice, don't think about paying 2000 without an invoice!
You say, you say more money, more money? You said I'll give you 1 million if you sell it for 1 million? If you want me to compensate, you can, bring the invoice!
If he really brought it, he should be confident to see when he bought it, what brand it was, and whether it could match the number!
If it's really more than 2,000, then you can buy it, don't give him money, and you have to get the original one back.
But I guess he wants to extort you a few dollars, and it's not too much for you to teach him a lesson in three hundred or two hundred.
-
Just a few hundred dollars, he doesn't want to do it, just accompany him, what's the big deal, this kind of person won't do much, just accompany him, and take it.
-
Hearing you say that does look like a scam.
But if you look at the zebra crossing --- the place of the incident, then look at the traffic lights.
You're a bit out of luck if you don't have lights. ~~
You can consider talking to him about it, how much the clothes are is how much is the money, and the loss is enough.
If you don't bother, go to court... If what you say is true, you will win.
-
Definitely a fraudster, there is so much of this garbage right now that it's easy to come across. It's not you who hit him, it's he who hits your car.
It is advisable to go to court.
-
Yes, as the saying goes, "touch porcelain", let the police solve the matter.
It's not that he said that he would lose as much as he wanted!
-
They are all at fault, why should you pay for it?
-
A colleague was hit by a bicycle while walking, and the bicycle owner asked the colleague to lose money, what should the colleague do?
The subject did not describe the specific circumstances of the accident of the colleague, and how to deal with the bicycle cyclist's claim needs to be made based on the facts of the accident. I would like to give a few suggestions to the subject for reference. I am willing to ask questions and consult netizens, welcome to consult and comment interaction, please follow me!
If Air Liquide makes sense, give me a thumbs up! <
If a colleague collides with a bicycle while walking on a non-motorized road, and the cyclist falls to the ground and is injured, the colleague shall compensate the cyclist for the loss if he is at fault, and the cyclist's negligence while riding shall reduce the liability of the colleague for compensation, and the specific liability shall be determined by judicial appraisal. If a colleague and a cyclist fail to collide at a crosswalk zebra crossing, the cyclist should push the bicycle through the crosswalk in accordance with the law, and the colleague is generally not liable.
If a colleague collides with a cyclist in a place where there is no lane division, the legal liability shall be determined according to their respective faults. I once walked by the river, a person from a distance while looking at the mobile phone while riding a bicycle to me quickly, I to the side of the road dodge or was hit, he fell to the ground and shouted pain, I stood still and dialed 122 to call the police ** for help, the traffic police came to ask both sides of the accident and looked at his mobile phone and my mobile phone **, thinking that the cyclist bears full responsibility, the burying bureau I just scratched the skin and did not pursue its responsibility. <>
If you are walking on the sidewalk, the bicycle owner will be compensated; If you are walking on the bicycle lane and your owner is injured or the bicycle is damaged, the walker will be compensated, and no compensation will be required if there is no damage; If there is no sidewalk or the sidewalk is occupied and cannot be walked, the walker does not need to compensate. (When we encounter such problems, we must deal with them calmly, and analyze specific problems in detail) <>
-
A colleague can directly call the police and ask the bicycle owner to compensate for his injuries.
-
I can't pay for it. You can let your colleagues take legal steps to protect their own rights and interests. You can visit whether there is a camera nearby at that time and keep the evidence, which is helpful for the quarrel after the promotion.
-
It should be the owner of this bicycle who lost money to his colleague, after all, he hit his colleague, and his colleague should use legal means to defend his rights.
-
Now it seems that if you haven't been hurt in any way, I suggest, forget it. If the trauma is severe, identification is necessary.
In general, the traffic police did not fulfill their obligations in their duties and did not give whose responsibility it was. But I don't think the traffic police will write bad traffic lights, such words. If it is really written, I think it is better for you to file a civil lawsuit than to file an administrative lawsuit.
Demand compensation from the administrative authorities.
Because of the accident certificate, it was not determined at all, and you can't win a civil lawsuit with this.
The so-called third phase still depends on your loss, after all, you still need to pay for this money at the beginning, and you may break the skin and buy a band-aid, which obviously outweighs the loss compared with the high cost of identification.
-
1. If the injury is not big, do not go for an appraisal.
2. Ask the traffic police to mediate and solve your problem as well.
-
If it's not a big problem, forget it. There is a loss of the bicycle to point the money is counted . You have to pay the appraisal fee first, and then ask the owner of the car, and they may not pay it directly.
-
I suggest that if you don't have a big deal to let the other party lose some money, forget it, the current traffic police will be with the mud, and besides, you just want the family to accompany you, you yourself are right? A slap doesn't make a sound, so you have to be forgiving and forgiving. If you give up your life, no matter how much money you lose, you won't be able to save it, right?
-
The results calculated by your personal lawyer may not be accepted by the other party.
Forensic centers are relatively more neutral and authoritative.
-
The results calculated by the lawyer hired by the individual may not be accepted by the other party.
It depends on the quality of your bike and your technique, I thought I was a direct drifter, though self. >>>More
According to your description, it is speculated that you may be talking about a fixgear car, which is a "dead fly", colorful, simple structure, and assembled in general bike dealers, which is not expensive compared to road bikes and mountain bikes, but if you want to ride well, you have to practice for a while. Ask your nearest car dealer for Fixgear and Dead Fly, and you should get the answers you're looking for. Hope it works for you.
The frame trek giant is good, the transmission set (commonly known as the kit) is more cost-effective to buy the whole vehicle, and it is more unified and will not be deceived. The main thing is not to know your budget, otherwise I can help you refer to it. >>>More
Agree with MCLUS's recommendation, 20043032 also makes sense! Equipment is more important! Although 1200 is relatively far, it is only a long distance of a week (or two weeks)! >>>More
The idea is good. It's harder, and I decided to give up after researching it before. >>>More