In ancient texts, the part of speech of a character is judged by the standard of modern Chinese char

Of course not, there are many words whose parts of speech have changed, such as:"of", there are nouns, pronouns, verbs, etc. in ancient texts.

The way is not good, it is known. We already understand that our political ideas don't work.

It is the property of the people of the Ming monarchy, and it will make Yang enough to serve his parents, and he will be able to give birth to his wife, and he will be full for life, and he will be free from death in the fierce year, and then drive it to be good, and the people will be light. ("The Affair of Qi Huan and Jin Wen") - Therefore, a wise monarch shall establish the inheritance that the common people should have, so that they must serve their parents enough to serve their superiors and raise their wives and children to their subordinates. He was full in good years, free from death in famine years, and then urged them to do good deeds, so it was easy for the common people to follow him.

What is Song's crime? ("Public Loss") - What is the crime of the Song Kingdom?

If you don't learn to know yourself, you don't know if you don't ask, and you can't do anything in ancient and modern times. (On Balance? Knowing"—understanding without learning yourself, understanding by yourself without asking others, there is no such thing in ancient and modern things.

Example: There are two "of". The first preceded noun and followed by the verbal phrase "no" is a conjunction, connecting the subject and the predicate, constituting a partial phrase as an object in the sentence, and the second "zhi" is followed by a verb as an object, which is a pronoun, and the case of "the way is not good". For example, there are four "of".

The first is connected with the noun "people" and the noun "production", which is a conjunction, connecting the definite and the central language; The second is followed by the noun "good" (adjective), which is a verb; the third is followed by the noun "people" and the verb "from", which is a conjunction, and has the same effect as the "zhi" of "the road is not good"; The fourth upper verb "from", and the lower particle "also", is a pronoun, on behalf of "Mingjun". For example, the "zhi" is followed by the noun "what sin" and the verb "to have". "What sin" and "have" do not constitute a subject-verb relationship, and "zhi" is a pronoun, which refers to the preceding object "what sin".

For example, the "zhi" is followed by a negative adverb and followed by the verb "have", which is a pronoun, and the preceding case is the precedent object of "have".

Regardless of what kind of language it is, the judgment of parts of speech should be based on the grammatical role of the word in the sentence.

Determine the parts of speech of words in ancient texts.

And how to judge the grammatical function is to judge it according to its relationship with other words. Of course, these judgments also need to be combined with the meaning of the sentence. The example you give is, of course, based on its meaning in ancient texts.

It would be wrong to say that he is an adjective and used as a verb.

You say that "adjectives are used as verbs" is already thinking according to the thinking of modern people, and at that time there was no adjective or verb, they thought that the use of "green" in this sentence is to express the meaning of making "Jiangnan" green, itself "green" is the so-called verb now, just say that this "green" is a verb, according to the ancient part of speech to judge.

Refer to an explanation:

In modern Chinese, "only" is just an adverb with a limited scope, which means "travel only"; But in ancient Chinese, in addition to expressing this meaning, it can also be enlightened to indicate a large number, with the meaning of "almost", "near", this meaning and usage of "only", mainly appeared in the poetry of the Tang Dynasty, and it should be read "jìn".Such as:

At the beginning of Suiyang, there were only 10,000 soldiers, and there were tens of thousands of households in the city. (Han Yu's "Preface to Zhang Zhongcheng's Biography") only 10,000 people: nearly 10,000 people.

There are ancient pines and old cedars in the sandwich stream, and the big is only surrounded by ten people, and the height does not know how many hundred feet. (Bai Juyi's "Lushan Thatched Cottage Record") only demolished the side to know ten people around: nearly ten people thick.

1. Jiang: originally referred to the Yangtze River, and later changed from a proper name to a common name.

2. River: It originally referred to the Yellow River, and later changed from a proper name to a common name.

3. Vegetables: Originally, it only referred to vegetables, but later even meat was included.

4. Meat: It originally referred to the meat of poultry and animals, but now in most areas, it refers exclusively to pork without restricting words.

5. Grain: It was originally the general name of cereals, and now the "millet" in the north refers to the grain that can be milled into millet, and the "millet" in the south refers to rice.

6. Snot: It originally referred to tears, but it already referred to snot in the Han Dynasty.

7. Letter: In ancient times, it only referred to the person who sent the letter, and the meaning of the letter now was called "book" in ancient times.

8. Very: It turned out to be the "ruthless" of **, an adjective, and now it means that it has a high degree and is an adverb.

Stupid: It used to refer to the raw material for papermaking, but now it refers to low IQ.

The differences in the part of speech, meaning and usage of "少" in ancient Chinese and modern Chinese are mainly reflected in the following differences when "少" is pronounced as shǎo:

1. When used as few adjectives, ancient and modern Chinese have the meaning of small quantity, and ancient Chinese also has the meaning of weak and "small". For example:

The strength is less but not the strong. - Han Feizi "Less: Weak.

Urine can not be stroked, and pain leads to less abdomen. -- Theory of the Origin and Syndrome of Diseases: Stone Shower's Syndrome is less: "small".

2. When the verb is used less, ancient and modern Chinese have two meanings: missing and lacking, while ancient Chinese also has weakened and despised meanings. For example:

If you want the peace and security of the world, you can't build princes and have less power. - Jia Yi's "Public Security Policy" is less: weakened.

There are also few Confucian disciples. - Wang Chong's "On Balance" is less: contempt.

3. When used as less adverbs, ancient and modern Chinese have a slight meaning, and ancient Chinese still has a meaning for a while. For example:

Shaoyan, the moon comes out of the east mountain, hovering between the fight and the bull. - Song S. Su Shi's "Former Chibi Fu" less: for a while.

The classification of parts of speech in ancient Chinese and modern Chinese is the same, which is first divided into two categories: real words and imaginary words, and then subdivided into name, verb, shape, number, quantity, generation, vice, intermediary, connection, help, sigh, and onomatopoeia.

Answers]: a, c, d, e

The correct answer is that the chain fiber is acde, and the closed circle of item b is the meaning of harming the shed and imitating fear, and "fear" is to make the use and make the ......Fear.

Answer: Historical words.

Analysis: Ancient words include literary words and historical words. Wenyan words are ancient words that have been replaced by modern Chinese words, and the things, phenomena or concepts they represent still exist in real life, but have been replaced by newly created words. Historical words are words that denote things that once existed in history, but have now died out.