The first paragraph of Fish I Want is divided into three sections, how to divide them

The three sections are as follows:

1. Fish, I want it; Paws.

I also want it. You can't have both, and you can't have both, and those who give up the fish and take the bear's paw are also. Life, also what I want; Righteousness is also what I want. You can't have both, and those who sacrifice their lives to take righteousness are also. (Arguments).

2. Life is also what I want, and what I want is more than the living, so I don't want to get it; Death is also evil to me, and evil is worse than the dead, so I have no way to get rid of it. If a man is made to do more than to live, then why should he not use him who can live? If there is no worse than the dead, then why not avoid the sick?

Argument) 3. From the yes to the birth and there is not to use, from the yes can avoid the trouble and there is not to do it. Therefore they desire more than the living, and evil more than the dead. Not only the sage has a heart, everyone has it, and the sage can not lose his ears. (Argument).

Literary Appreciation

Fish I Want".

Excerpt from Mencius.

Gaozi I", discusses an important proposition of Mencius: righteousness is more important than life, and when righteousness and life cannot be both, life should be sacrificed for righteousness.

Mencius said, "The heart of shame is also righteousness." (Mencius, Gaozi I) and said:

Righteousness, the way also. ......Only a gentleman can follow the way. Mencius thought that he was ashamed of doing bad things, and others were disgusted by doing bad things, and this is righteousness; Righteousness is the right path that a moral gentleman must follow.

Mencius first used an analogy with the specific things that people are familiar with in life: fish is what I want, and bear's paw is also what I want, and in the case that the two cannot be obtained at the same time, I would rather give up the fish and have the bear's paw; Life is what I cherish, and righteousness is also what I cherish, and in the case that the two cannot be obtained at the same time, I would rather give up my life in favor of righteousness.

Mencius compared life to a fish and righteousness to a bear's paw, believing that righteousness is more precious than life just as a bear's paw is more precious than a fish, which naturally leads to the proposition of "sacrificing life for righteousness". This assertion is the central thesis of the whole article.

The above content refers to Encyclopedia - Fish I want.

Fish Core Town, I can do what I want; Bear's paws, as well as I want. You can't have both, and you can't have both, and those who give up the fish and take the bear's paw are also. Life, also I want to change the rough, righteousness, also what I want; You can't have both, and those who sacrifice their lives to take righteousness are also.

The life is also what I want, and what I want is more than the living, so it is not for (wéi) 苟 (gǒu) to get also; Death is also my evil (wù), and the evil (wù) is worse than the dead, so there is no way to dispel (bì). If a man is made to do more than to live, then why should he not use him who can live? If there is no worse evil than the dead, then if there is no way to dispel the sick, why not be the sick?

From yes is born and there is no use, and from yes can be rid of (bì) suffering and there is not for (wéi) also. Therefore there is more desire than the living, and evil (wù) is greater than that of the dead. Not only the sage has a heart, everyone has it, and the sage can not lose his ears.

The author of "Fish I Want" put forward the idea of sacrificing life for righteousness. From the beginning to the point where "those who sacrifice their lives for righteousness also" present the arguments of this article. The author first talks about a common sense of life, that is, in the case that fish and bear's paws cannot be obtained at the same time, it is generally necessary to "give up the fish and take the bear's paw", using this common sense of life as a metaphor, which naturally leads to the conclusion that we should "sacrifice life and take righteousness" when life and righteousness cannot be taken into account at the same time, which is also the main purpose of this article.

This article uses metaphors, contrasts, and examples.

1. Figurative argument: At the beginning of this article, a metaphorical argument is used, comparing the choice between life and death to the choice of a fish and a bear's paw.

2. Example argument: The author takes "a spoon of food, a bean soup" as an example, which seems to be a trivial "a spoon of food, a bean soup", when it is related to life and death, it can also test a person's morality. "Huer" and "Keer" are disdainful of "doers" and "beggars", which is a manifestation of people not losing their "original heart".

3. Comparative argument: The third paragraph uses a comparative argument to compare the current situation with the previous situation. Citing the example of some people who "do not defend propriety and righteousness" and covet "ten thousand bells" to illustrate the manifestation of the loss of "original heart".

One piece of food, one bean soup" is much less than "ten thousand bells", but "Fude is dead", it seems to be more important.

Compare "a spoonful of food, a bean soup" with "ten thousand bells". In terms of the amount of wealth, "10,000 bells" are naturally many. However, "Wan Zhong" determines "the beauty of the palace, the devotion of wives and concubines, and the poor who know me to get me", while "a spoon of food, a bean soup" determines life, which is naturally more important than "Wan Zhong".

Through this comparison, people not only realize how unworthy it is to leave "etiquette and righteousness" behind and covet wealth and wealth, but also make people realize that the loss of "original heart" is a gradual process, and people should always reflect on themselves.

Figurative argument. The article begins with fish and bear's paws.

To set up a metaphor and draw conclusions, those who give up the fish and take the bear's paw are also. This leads to the central argument of this article, sacrificing one's life for righteousness.

Illustrate with examples. A spoonful of food, beggars disdain. The image proves the idea that righteousness is more important than life.

Contrasting arguments. The first paragraph explains why we should give up, both positively and negatively. In the second paragraph, the different attitudes of Xiang and Jin towards Wan Zhong are contrasted, which proves the idea of sacrificing one's life for righteousness from the other side.